Anonymous #2 14w

You guys really just want everyone that you dislike to die. Guys, people could say the same about you. Your family or friends. I really hope you guys change this toxic mindset. I only want people to let others voice themselves and keep it nonviolent. Please. Just talk. Dancing on graves is sick. I hate being part of the left side, this is gross

2

This is where I disagree with most. The feeling bad part is whatever but its moreso the grave dancing. There is no overdramatizing because you know why? The mask is off now for people that are for assassinations. All over social media people supporting and praising it. This isn’t even about politics anymore. Its just a revelation that there are so many sociopaths that could one day turn on your and wish for your death if you don’t follow their righteous path. They will blame you for your death

1

- because “words are violence.” I heavily disagree with that idea. He can not ruin lives with semantics. He spoke, he conversed, he talked. And now we will no longer see discussion, only more violence. I don’t even have tiktok but what I saw come off of their lately….yikes. Society is doomed if we let these people fuel actual violence

2

Meant to type “Words” instead of “semantics”, apologies. Probably a little late to talk about this stuff but hey its been big this month

1

Anonymous #2 14w

words absolutely can be violence. he didn’t just talk to people, he didn’t converse. he debated. he fought until he thought he had won. have you actually watched his “conversations?” he impacts legislation with his words. he was the ceo of turning point usa, and was friends and allies with major repulican politicians. you cannot pretend he has not ruined lives with his words. people kill themselves over what he has said and the fear he has caused

1

Anonymous #4 14w

I guess I will just have to disagree with how you view him because I can not attribute someone’s life being taken to “his words” being the gun shot. I don’t think you’ve watched his conversations if you think debating was all there was to it. I don’t think people should prefer echo chambers. They should talk/disagree/debate. At least we can find compromise there. Not anymore. And I’m sorry, his beliefs mirror a lot of people’s beliefs so should they all be classes as violent? Should a big

1

Anonymous #4 14w

- portion of the country be painted as violent for their beliefs? No. If you think that, you’re the one ruining this country. Most people want to make their home a better and safer place. We disagree on how to do that. Everyone does. At this rate, people we think similar to now will be our enemies in the future and that is a scary thought. This is a slippery slope. Stop building a strawman of this person.

1

Anonymous #2 14w

I’m not even republican but I guess people might rope me in because oh no I think murdering for free speech is bad

1

I see your points, but I can not equate them to violence or more powerful than actually wielding the sword on someone. Because if thats the case, actual violence is nothing compared to these words. Words matter but words are not violent unless they are threats and ofc racism/ableism. I don’t think this is what we are talking about here because people are disagreeing with these descriptions of his rhetoric. It’s too much to get into. All in all, he didn’t deserve to die. I don’t want to hear

1

Least we can agree with the last part.

1