Anonymous #1 2w

Thats AI. Do you want me to show you the masters degree in History I just received? Fuggin’ can’t read a book or what? Historians agree the state of the USSR was far from perfect.

22

Anonymous OP 2w

what institution was your masters in history? By any chance, was it at a western institution staffed by predominantly upper middle class whites that benefit from global imperialism?

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

Western “historians” are propagandists for the current western-dominated world order where the NATO countries murder and enslave whomever they want. Your degree is worse than toilet paper. At least toilet paper helps people in a general sense.

-4

Anonymous #1 2w

The real reason OP hates communism: because OP wants to keep buying cheap chocolate and coffee made by child slaves in Africa.

-4

Anonymous #1 2w

The OP literally said Communism can be viable and is the best economic system to put power in the hands of the people. Where did you get the idea that the “OP hates communism”? Can you read?

25

Anonymous #1 2w

You keep using AI overview, all the while critiquing my methods of knowledge production? I never said i hate communism you nitwit. And my history program, as most history programs, works to deconstruction western thinking. But the USSR was decidedly not a great state and if you think it is because “the us hates it so it must be good”, you would be very foolish.

23

Anonymous #1 2w

I have three degrees and you can say what you want but i am intellectually more apt to talk about this subject because your method of thinking is fundamentally flawed and takes critique to mean hate and “one thing is bad, must mean other thing good!” Kinda caveman thinking. This is why our country is cooked.

17

Anonymous #1 2w

Also last thing ill say: how are you going to critique my degrees when you use AI OVERVIEW!! AI OVERVIEW LITERALLY TELLS YOU WHAT YOU SHOULD THINK!! It removes the research burden from you but it clearly inhibits your ability to critically think beyond “good” or “bad”.

13

Anonymous OP 2w

“Most western institutions work to deconstruct western thinking”. Thats what you claim but that claim is not backed by evidence. Thats the point. You can’t just “claim” to be a neutral arbiter of history. You can’t just declare yourself the unbiased arbiter of history.

-5

Anonymous OP 2w

When reading any historical or sociopolitical analysis, we must ask ourselves “who is the author? What kind of biases and ideas shape their worldview? Do they have any kind of vested interests in or another interpretation?”

-5

Anonymous #1 2w

No one, and i mean no one, claimed to be an unbiased arbiter of history. Thats like, history class 102. We all bring implicit biases into research, whether historical or otherwise. But YOU have brought a bias against the US thats so deep that you somehow have come full circle for dick riding for the USSR!!! You’re clearly not very smart, so don’t make any rash political statements when you can’t even understand the fact the US and USSR are BOTH bad.

17

Anonymous #1 2w

Where did i say i hate communism? Your inability to critically read is concerning and tells me you don’t even have one degree. Much love pookie.

13

Anonymous OP 2w

“I dont hate communism, I just hate every revolution that actually work and threatens my privilege to exploit the Global South or benefit from it”

-5

Anonymous OP 2w

“Ackchyually both sides bad” hahahaha how much did you pay for your history degree pick up that nugget

-5

Anonymous #1 2w

“I dont hate communism, i just think the USSR was a authoritarian state that participated in imperialism, brutal repression through gulags, exploitation of resources in the Global South”. Cute. Fixed it for you.

14

Anonymous #1 2w

I paid 0 dollars for all of my degrees lol. Thats what happens when you display actual academic potential. You clearly don’t.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

“No one claumed to be unbiased arbiter of history” You literally just said “western institutions are working to deconstruct the western thinking” So you just implied you are neutral and unbiased.

-5

Anonymous #1 2w

Dude really thinks he has the upper hand when he relies on AI for his sources. While you’re using AI, i’ll be in the archives lmfao. Chud.

7

Anonymous OP 2w

True or false: You and western historians are incentivized to oppose anti-imperialist movements (which the USSR funded in abundance) because you benefit from world imperialism?

-4

Anonymous #1 2w

I said working. I didn’t say they have fully succeeded. God your brain is kinda amazing with how it jumps to conclusions so quickly. And no. I said no historian will ever be unbiased because we are humans.

7

Anonymous #1 2w

True or false: Your sources are AI. And im not being paid to make conclusions based on empirical evidence. I’m crying this is hilarious.

7

Anonymous OP 2w

Answer my question: historians from the imperial core are financially incentivized to write “history” that paints anti-imperialist movements in a negative light. Yes or no?

-4

Anonymous #1 2w

Answer my question: you use AI and are told what to believe. True or false?

6

Anonymous #2 2w

You seeing this shit man? Im not crazy am i? I didnt say communism bad right?

5

Anonymous OP 2w

The AI is just a summarizing tool. Are you actually denying that the USSR aided anti-imperialist movements worldwide? Which goes against your class interests.

-4

Anonymous OP 2w

Please answer my question: If Americans benefit from world imperialism, does that not mean that American historians are financially incentivized to side with imperialism?

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

True or false: Your use of AI overturns anything you say because you didnt make that conclusion. Meaning, whether you like it or not, you’re a sheep who goes “BAAAA” and tries to call out other sheep.

7

Anonymous OP 2w

See?? You cant answer the question. You refuse to admit that you benefit from imperialism, so of course your interpretation of history is against all meaningful threats to world imperialism.

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

Im gonna keep ragging on you for the AI btw. Because your opinion relying on AI is telling and shows me youve never been in an archive before lol.

7

Anonymous #1 2w

Case and point. You arent a scholar in any real sense. You’re a propagandist for an evil system that does horrific things all over the world.

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

You didn’t answer the question. You use AI and that proves youre most likely not the best equipped to handle these discussions. Also the USSR benefited from imperialism in South Asia tf you talking about?

5

Anonymous #1 2w

Say what you want: I produce knowledge from its fundamental level and work everyday to deconstruct my biases. You parrot it from AI and call it revolutionary. You are the koolaid drinker lmfao. Night chud.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

You’re shameless. I work in REAL academia. I do work that benefits ALL the people of the world. You arent an academic. You benefit from imperialism, so you peddle lies and omitted truths to discredit anti-imperialism.

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

you literally cant even admit you benefit from imperialism

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

I bet bros a communications major lol. Good night chud. I have awards. You have… ai overview. Sad :(

7

Anonymous OP 2w

Bruh youre a propagandist for imperialist mass murder

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

No— i as well as all INCLUDING YOU benefit from imperialism. Which is why i have taken numerous steps to prevent that from seeping into my work. Black studies training will do that. But to try to suggest the USSR is a good state is simply foolish at best and stupidity at worst. Maybe take a glance at many of our homegrown marxists like Du Bois. But oh wait. You’d call him a crock of shit. 😂

12

Anonymous OP 2w

So you admit you benefit from imperialism. And the USSR funded and armed anti-imperialist movements worldwide, including Cuba, Vietnam, Algeria, South Africa, Mozambique, Guinea, Kenya, Indonesia, etc etc. So logically it follows, you have a financial conflict of interest with the USSR. Yes?

-4

Anonymous OP 2w

Lmao

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

And it also funded imperialism is South Asia. You benefit from imperialism too my friend. Act like a saint all you want— none of us leave this world under patriarchal racial capitalism unscathed. Unfortunately thats the world left to us. But to try to sugarcoat a horrible regimes misdoings because its the closest we have come to the ideal system is actually inane. See: thats the thing about historians. We work to deconstruct our biases. You clearly dont “oh true scholar”

3

Anonymous OP 2w

True or false, you have a direct financial conflict of interest when discussing the USSR?

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

AI overview again lmfao. Imma keep saying that to your responses. And Dubois was marxist: so why wouldn’t he be increasingly sympathetic to the USSR? But that doesn’t mean a supporter.

6

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user. (Imma keep saying this until you tire yourself out)

4

Anonymous #1 2w

Why havent you acknowledged the USSRs role in South Asian imperialism?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Bro you basically hate the USSR because they told your slaves to rebel against you

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖

5

Anonymous OP 2w

You mean Afghanistan? When feminists and peasants overthrew the brutal feudal monarchy? And the US helped the taliban return Afghanistan to feudalism?

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖

3

Anonymous OP 2w

Its funny you accuse me of being a communications major when you’re a propagandist and not even very good at it lmao

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖

5

Anonymous OP 2w

I dont think the CIA is gonna pay for such low effort comments tbh

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖

4

Anonymous OP 2w

If you think western scholars give unbiased views on the USSR, do you think Israeli scholars give unbiased views on Palestinian resistance? 🤔🤔🤔

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖

4

Anonymous #1 2w

Hey, ive gotta go to bed. But you know what my favorite part about history is? Theres a term and methodology literally dedicated to correcting previous scholars: its called historiography and its vitally important to every piece of history written. It is a moment of self reflection in which scholars acknowledge the historical wrongs done by the field. And thats the best part: whereas we self reflect as a vital part of our profession: you don’t even know where to start. Goodnight, oh sweet chud.

7

Anonymous OP 2w

You’re not a scholar and neither are your forebears. Just generations of propagandists for imperialism. Real scholars would disclose financial conflicts of interests, which you fail to do.

-4

Anonymous #1 2w

AI user 🤖 also do you think historians get a check from the government or something? This is really sad coping.

9

Anonymous #1 2w

You’re just mad someone who is more educated than you is a better scholar all the while acknowledging and deconstructing imperialism through black studies. Its ok to be mad. Its not okay to be stupid.

10

Anonymous #1 2w

Night night!

13

Anonymous OP 2w

You unblocked me, does that mean youre ready to admit you have a financial conflict of interest discussing the USSR as beneficiary of world imperialism?

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

This is really sad lol. I blocked you because i wanted to go to bed without your weirdly obsessive notifications blowing me up. I have no conflict of interest and get no government money to say the USSR was objectively a bad state. Did you know the USSR killed gay people? Very revolutionary of them 😂. Get a life “scholar”.

8

Anonymous #1 2w

Reply all you want: you were literally and intellectually ratioed all around.

8

Anonymous OP 2w

You literally do have a conflict of interest, and you know it. Virtually every product bought in the west comes from slave labor in the Global South

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

If the USSR won the cold war, this wouldnt be the case. Your entire lifestyle and dominance of the world is maintained by the american subjugation of the Global South.

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

I don’t lol. Its cute you think the government values historians enough to pay them lol

9

Anonymous OP 2w

Everyone on earth knows you do have a financial conflict of interest. You’re a fascist liar. You lie about history because it benefits you to keep the Global South subjugated.

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

Your AI sources are a conflict of interest. Who is funding that, oh yeah the western imperialist you hate.

5

Anonymous #1 2w

Explain how the USSR’s longstanding anti lgbtq stances wouldve changed if they had won the cold war. Also— why is winning a war the predicate to not killing gay people?

6

Anonymous #1 2w

Lol I don’t.

9

Anonymous #3 2w

Exactly! I wonder why the USA wants AI so badly in classrooms: probably because we get anti-critical thinking chuds like this one lol.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Exactly, I just don’t understand how one could think they are fighting imperialism and use ai to provide sources. Bc I’m sorry AI is very much so a result of capitalism, imperialism, and western culture as a whole

2

Anonymous #3 2w

Eat shit fash, China’s gonna win the cold war and imperialist scum like you are gonna be treated like the nazis you are. How many kids did you western liberals murder in Palestine? Yemen? Iraq? Vietnam?

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

Are you going to admit you have a conflict of interest discussing the USSR because you benefit from world imperialism and the USSR was the principal funder of anti-imperial movements?

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

You using ai is funding those murders

5

Anonymous #3 2w

Harris voter?

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

Oh i see: youre literally being paid by China or youre a ccp apologist. Explains it. Youre the real propagandist lmfao

6

Anonymous #1 2w

If you really cared about the people in those countries you wouldn’t be using ai. Quick who funds the ai you use

7