
this is my honest view. being a man/woman is different than being amab/afab. identifying as a nb man/woman? cool. no red flags. when someone says they identify as their asab, that does throw up some red flags (for me personally, based on my experience). it *usually* means they have not unpacked/unlearned certain bioessentialist and transphobic beliefs.
AGAB + ASAB are used interchangeably. It’s the same to say “I don’t understand why someone would identify as nonbinary + their ASAB vs cis + gender non-conforming”. I don’t have to understand to interact with people respectfully (use their pronouns etc), but I agree that it’s weird (and antithetical) for a trans person to identify with their AGAB/ASAB.
So would it also be weird for someone to say they’re a nonbinary man/woman or is the problem just male/female? I don’t really see why it would be an issue, especially the latter, since it seems most people in the trans community (me included) view sex and gender and two different things. I get some people use asab/agab interchangeably, but personally, I still apply the sex≠gender logic when it comes to how I do/don’t identity with what I was “born as”
asab and agab are interchangeable bc they refer to the same moment/process. children are raised and assumed/coerced to be cis. asab is not interchangeable with man/woman OR male/female. there are trans women who are female (+AMAB), trans men who are male (+AFAB). asab is very specifically about an assignment *at birth*. that’s why this criticism exists. it’s choosing to identify with a doctor’s statement about you and not self-identifying based on your experiences/self-knowledge.
It’s both, I identify myself using terms I’m most comfortable with, some of which align with terms used to describe me at birth and others not. I don’t like it when people try to imply I’m not actually trans just because I think about sex and gender as separate things, honestly I thought that was the norm in the community. I’m not cis but that doesn’t mean I want to change my sex
the idea that ASAB and AGAB could be distinct is nonsensical, it’s due to shifting preferred language not a distinct concept. ASAB originated in trans + intersex activist spaces to talk abt coercive (and sometimes surgical) assignment, which is the basis of coercive gendered upbringing. the point is that the two are congruent. many of these problems exist because people use ASAB as a proxy for things it’s not (adult genitalia, “gendered socialization”, etc) which harms trans + intersex ppl.
I’m aware that intersex people are usually surgically altered to fit a binary sex and gender at birth so I can see why those would be used interchangeably, it seems like the issue is less about me identifying as male/female and nb at the same time and more of me just not understanding the intended context of as/gab. But it makes more sense now