Anonymous #1 17w

i’m not angry, yall were the ones up in my comments being triggered and bringing up a point i already acknowledged and said more than once i wasn’t arguing against. instead of actually talking abt my opinion on the merits, u guys resorted to insults and strawmanning.

-1

Anonymous #1 17w

also coming to a separate post to argue abt it then calling me the one who’s mad is pretty funny ngl

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

nobody we being triggered, we were just telling you its a stupid ass opinion as it goes against the apps policies and intentions

7

Anonymous OP 17w

you made the post im allowed to respond to it

6

Anonymous #1 17w

u actually don’t know how to read

-1

Anonymous #1 17w

also by your logic you should be okay with grindr excluding women if it was in their tos, which u obviously wouldn’t be.

-2

Anonymous #1 17w

i never said u aren’t allowed to respond to it. i’m saying it’s ironic to come on a post to reignite an argument and then call someone else mad

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

if it was in their tos, and stated intentions of the app sure. thx for putting words in my mouth. but thats not the reality we live in so it doesn’t matter

9

Anonymous #1 17w

u do realize a tos is not the end all be all of what SHOULD occur, right?

-2

Anonymous OP 17w

I do. but there is no reason why women shouldn’t be on an app thats for all genders

10

Anonymous #1 17w

that is your opinion!

-2

Anonymous #1 17w

anyways i’m muting this cuz yall are being dense on purpose and invalidating people talking abt gay issues lol

-1

Anonymous OP 17w

the opinion of the app itself

9

Anonymous OP 17w

what gay issue has been invalidated again?

7