Anonymous #2 6w

If someone told me they thought I didn’t have fully functional anatomy I’d punch the shit out of them. That’s just wild and transphobic to say

43

Anonymous OP 6w

it’s not transphobic you just don’t like hearing it

-11

Anonymous #2 6w

No, dude, it’s actually pretty shitty to call someone “not fully functional” imagine saying that my mom who had uterine cancer dosent have “fully functional anatomy” because she can’t have kids. That would be shitty. It dosent become less shitty because it’s about trans people

26

Anonymous OP 6w

we’re not talking about your mother who had uterine cancer that’s called a straw man fallacy. the example was that maybe the bi person likes when a male partner produces sperm during ejaculation and someone that can’t do that (cis or trans) is not something they would be comfortable with. it’s just a sexual preference and that’s my guess at what this person is implying

-13

Anonymous #3 6w

I’m not rage baiting. Maybe you shut the fuck up

20

Anonymous #2 6w

there are cis men that are sterile so that reasoning is in fact transphobic.

26

Anonymous #2 6w

They never said the issue was ejaculation. He said he dosent want to be with TRANS PEOPLE. No reasoning, besides them being trans.

24

Anonymous #4 6w

yea so if you reread my fucking comment i said cis OR trans meaning it’s only about men that can’t produce regardless of them being trans

-10

Anonymous #2 6w

And if you read my fucking comment he never said anything about cis people

19

Anonymous OP 6w

they said they can’t date/have sex with a trans person. i can’t date/have sex with someone that has a micro penis does that make me ableist ? or is it just a preference in sexual partners

-9

Anonymous #2 6w

Also the person was BISEXUAL!!?? Do they not like women either because women don’t ejaculate the same??

17

Anonymous #2 6w

Ok I’m done with your rage-baiting. You know there’s a difference between someone having a micropenis, and not dating any trans person at any point in their transition no matter what surgery or hormones or passing they have, simply on the basis of them being transgender

19

Anonymous OP 6w

a trans woman wouldn’t ejaculate the same way as a cis woman as well. it’s just different and it’s just a preference

-8

Anonymous #2 6w

It’s very worrying that you choose partners on the basis of ejaculation.

19

Anonymous #2 6w

all i’m gonna say is if you’re not gonna state your reasons for not dating trans people when you’re bi, you can’t get upset when people assume you’re transphobic.

21

Anonymous OP 6w

what rage baiting ? i do not understand what’s wrong with this person having a preference to only date cis people. them being bi is irrelevant bc they want to date a CIS man or a CIS woman only. it’s a preference not everyone needs to date a trans person to be an ally

-5

Anonymous #4 6w

dating, sleeping with whatever ^^

12

Anonymous #2 6w

But if you’re bi why would it matter if someone’s trans. Thats my question.

22

Anonymous #4 6w

they didn’t say anything transphobic tho everyone just put words in their mouth

-4

Anonymous OP 6w

breaking news: people can choose sexual partners based on sexual preferences because this is someone they are having sex with and want to have a positive sex life with this person

-5

Anonymous OP 6w

because cis is not the same as trans

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

So why is it so different.

11

Anonymous #2 6w

What’s different to you between cis and trans people that would make you date a cis person but not a trans person

18

Anonymous OP 6w

well cis means you identify with the sex you were assigned at birth and trans means you do not identify with the sex assigned at birth. that seems pretty different to me idk. there’s nothing wrong with having a preference why are you blowing this out of proportion ?

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

Okay so what about someone who’s sex at birth differs from their current gender identification would be a dealbreaker. And op didn’t say any dealbreakers with cis people. So it has to be something besides the actual transness (as being disgusted that someone’s trans is transphobic) and also something that wouldn’t be something any cis people are effected by (as op didn’t say any dealbreakers about cis people)

7

Anonymous OP 6w

you’re making assumptions here that can only result in this person being transphobic and are honestly just saying a whole lot of hoopla. like none of this remotely makes sense. they don’t want to have sex with someone that is not cis. that doesn’t make them transphobic it’s just sex that they wouldn’t be comfortable with

-4

Anonymous #2 6w

I’m not making assumptions, I’m going off of the logic from the og post

12

Anonymous OP 6w

and they also said they’re fully accepting of trans people as an ally. what about that is transphobic to you ?

-4

Anonymous #2 6w

I think an ally who’s BISEXUAL should really think about why they being attracted to multiple genders aren’t attracted at all to any trans people. It’s just weird to me. It’s like they see trans people as inherently diffrent than cis people, just for being trans, and that is something they don’t like

17

Anonymous OP 6w

they’re not wrong trans is different from cis. literally by definition

-5

Anonymous #2 6w

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say. Yes, trans people are different, yes, there can be valid reasons to not want to date trans people, but they specifically said they were bi with no genital preference. if there’s no other reason they can break it down into besides literally “because they’re trans”, that doesn’t really make any sense.

16

Anonymous #2 6w

you are just making up a reason that if you squint really really hard “isn’t transphobic” and assuming that must be it and they must mean it in this very specific way that’s still pretty shitty and makes a lot of wild assumptions, because it’s just inconceivable that maybe the person who said some transphobic shit is just a shitty person. no one asked you to write fanfic about them so stop doing free labor to protect shitty people from scrutiny

10

Anonymous #5 6w

they did not say “no genital preference” now you’re just putting words in their mouth and making assumptions

-1

Anonymous #6 6w

they didn’t say anything transphobic ? they just said they couldn’t be in a physical relationship with someone who is trans but support them otherwise

-1

Anonymous #2 6w

People ask for the answer and then get pissed when they get a perfectly reasonable answer. It’s not transphobic that you don’t want to sleep with a trans person and it is harmful rhetorical to the trans community to repeat. As a trans person I also don’t want to sleep with someone who wasn’t attracted to my body. Consent takes two, and if one says no thanks then you shut up end of conversation. They’re not going out of their way to shit on me, they’re just not interested. Life goes on

-1

Anonymous #3 6w

no shit, but this wasn’t about any particular person, this was someone saying they couldn’t be with trans people in general without stating a deeper reason than their being trans. It is obviously fine to find individual people unattractive.

7

Anonymous #2 6w

I thought they said no genital preference, but the post seems to be gone so I’m not sure. In any case, a genital preference would still not really change anything, the point still stands that they didn’t give any other reason, and genital preference wouldn’t make much difference post op

5

Anonymous #5 6w

like, it is really not that hard for them to state a deeper reason if it isn’t just transphobia. However most of the deeper reasons I can think of wouldn’t cover all trans people specifically and no cis people so it seems weird to state it as such.

10