Anonymous #2 1d

No one

15

Anonymous #3 1d

having your literal sex organs out is inherently sexual???

-5

Anonymous OP 1d

No it’s literally not. That’s sexualizing someone and following western societal norms. The sexualization of the human body is relatively recent

17

Anonymous #3 1d

if someone went around my kid with their dick out then i would call the cops and have them arrested immediately and if you wouldn’t do the same then i believe you are truly a sick and evil human being

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

No one said they wouldn’t?! I’m quite literally a survivor of CSA. But the over sexualization of the human body is what got us here

14

Anonymous #3 1d

Exactly

10

Anonymous OP 1d

I don’t think anybody is arguing that in our current society, it is OK to pull your dick out in front of a kid. Why the fuck would anybody argue otherwise? Of course, most people would call the cops

11

Anonymous #1 1d

and yet when someone brings up how nudity at pride parades (which are usually outside which is public or explicitly claim to be family friendly) yall act like its not a problem???? if it’s not okay for a person to do just out and about then it shouldn’t be at these pride events.

-1

Anonymous #4 1d

“well no one said its okay to flash kids” then proceeds to defend being naked when children can see it

4

Anonymous #1 1d

Ok I actually did just see someone in another comment section say that should be ok though. Sadly

6

Anonymous OP 1d

Legitimately how many fully nude people are you seeing at pride? Like I’ve never seen someone fully nude. I’ve seen breasts but if men can be topless so can women. So apparently your area has a nudity problem

18

Anonymous #5 1d

well yes that is the case for a locker room but we are talking about pride parades hello did i miss something???

0

Anonymous #2 1d

Who?!

6

Anonymous OP 1d

“obviously it’s not okay to flash kids” and then talks about how flashing kids isn’t inherently sexual and that it’s okay 😭

10

Anonymous #3 1d

a person came on here talking about experiences they have had and people defended the public nudity. i do agree that being topless isn’t inherently sexual and shouldn’t be seen as such btw i do want to make that clear

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

No one is arguing that it’s not problem if it is that an event that clearly states that it is for children or child friendly at that point you’re deeply in pedophile territory.

12

Anonymous #4 1d

IDK HOW THEY DONT HEAR IT

1

Anonymous OP 1d

I didn’t realize this post was abt pride specifically, I thought we were talking about any space where a child might be

6

Anonymous #3 1d

I’ve seen at least two people say that it should be okay to show your genitals to anyone because it’s not sexual, but then they say kids are an exception because then it would be sexual, it’s confusing

1

Anonymous #2 1d

Like you can’t have both, either being naked around strangers who didn’t consent is chill and natural (how I wish it could be but our society is too fucked for that), or it’s not okay for anyone who isn’t consenting (which includes children, they literally can’t consent)

0

Anonymous #1 1d

its also just the public nudity in general though. anyone can see these parades when they are out in the open even if they aren’t marketed towards children. protecting children should be a top priority. if you are going to act in a sexual manner you need to be mindful of who could see it and if theres a possibility of a non consenting person witnessing it then dont do it. that is a responsible and right thing to do.

0

Anonymous #2 1d

That’s not confusing tho? We are saying that it should be fine for people to exist in their natural bodies but we can’t bc society has sexualizes children and all of us. The issue isn’t our body parts, it’s our society that sexualizes children that’s the problem

8

Anonymous #3 1d

Society doesn’t just sexualize children it sexualizes all of us. It’s not normal to be nude in public because that’s viewed as sexual, and involving people who haven’t consented (adults who haven’t consented plus children) is viewed as sexual harassment

17

Anonymous #3 1d

its also never just body parts. if you cant see that sex organs are sexual then i do think you need genuine psychological help but other than that its the kink. public kink is disgusting. other people do not consent to it. especially children.

6

Anonymous #2 1d

“viewed as”???? it quite literally is????

1

Anonymous OP 1d

I mean not everyone views nudity as being inherently sexual, it can be neutral or artistic in certain contexts. But just being naked walking around a grocery store is viewed as sexual by most people due to the way our society is structured

15

Anonymous #2 1d

I don’t really get why people think it’s not okay to expose yourself to children (I agree with that btw) but totally fine to do the same to adults who haven’t consented to it, I’d love an explanation on what the difference is, the whole point of not doing sexual things with children is that they *cant consent*

15

Anonymous #5 1d

But yeah theres typically a difference between the “family friendly” events and the 21+ events at pride, its usually at a different time or location, you wouldn’t take a baby to a bar crawl, there should be security checking ids for the tents/events that allow nudity/alc

12

Anonymous #2 1d

Thank you! That’s been my entire point

1

Anonymous #6 1d

showing genitalia to children is text book pedophilia btw

10

Anonymous #2 1d

it’s not okay to expose yourself to anyone who does not give consent

4

Anonymous #2 1d

Yes!!

7

Anonymous #6 1d

you don’t think being naked and sexual around children is pdf behavior? 🤨

13

Anonymous #6 1d

Twin what?

5

Anonymous OP 1d

no actually, it’s not. teaching children to be able to differentiate between non-sexual nudity and sexually predatory behavior is actually important.

9

Anonymous #4 1d

How did we pull this out of thin air?

4

Anonymous OP 1d

And I’d agree in most contexts Excluding stuff like visual arts or emergencies etc. But that’s not the same as just choosing to walk up to someone with your dick out lol

5

Anonymous OP 1d

Correct

3

Anonymous #4 1d

there is a distinct difference between “naked” and “naked and sexual.” it’s also difficult to take your discussion of this topic seriously because you refuse to even say the word pedophile/pedophilia. you’re not seriously engaging with this issue. you’re laundering queerphobic talking points.

18

Anonymous #6 1d

its an important topic but also censorship is a thing. i also find it annoying when ppl dont use the correct terms but i dont want my post to be taken down. i do care about what im saying and i want to get my points across

0

Anonymous #1 21h

I’ve seen people in this group unironically arguing that full nudity and explicit kink should be allowed at non-18+ pride events. Like the public ones on the street with children in attendance

-1

Anonymous #2 21h

You’d be surprised

0