Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
blocked for saying misandry is a incel dogwhistle. lmfao y’all hate women.
upvote 27 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 7w

I’m assuming you commented on the post about transmisandry, and that IS a real term referring to real intersectional discrimination. it’s VERY different from just “misandry.” even if you don’t use the term or think “misogyny” covers it well enough, implying transmisandry is an “incel dogwhistle” isnt it.

upvote 30 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

I can’t fact check your comments or their context since the post is deleted, but there’s a good chance you simply misinterpreted

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

the correct term is anti-transmasculinity. transmisandry is a misnomer that was coined by transmisogynistic bigots. “misandry” is not an independent concept, it is an incel dogwhistle used and popularized by the manosphere. that is why it was used. misogyny as a concept exists independent of transmisogyny, both exist and transmisogyny functions as a standalone concept.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 7w

anti-transmasculinity clearly describes what is actually being targeted: transmasculinity. we’re not being targeted for being men, but for being *trans men/transmascs*. i’m saying this as an ftm butch with a degree focusing in gender studies. i’m tired of seeing misandry/transmisandry laundered and validated as a term in queer spaces.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

Are you saying that misandry literally isn’t a concept here? Obviously there’s not systemic misandry, and interpersonal misandry is far less impactful, but saying it’s not even a word doesn’t make much sense

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7w

it is a word which was coined by anti-feminists and is still used and popularized by anti-feminists. it is not actually a concept describing a system of oppression based in reality, it’s a rhetorical tool to minimize misogyny. just because there’s a word word to describe something doesn’t mean that it’s based in reality, a serious concept, and/or non-harmful.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 7w

I get what you’re saying, but anti transmasculinity and transmisandry are describing the same real phenomenon, even if thd root words have different origins. It’s one thing to take issue with the word and advocate for using a different one, but I’m not really understanding what you mean when you say it straight up isn’t a concept

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7w

if you mean misandry specifically, that makes a bit more sense, but misandry as in a systemic oppression of men (not real) and misandry as in personal level sexism against men are different, and the fact that people incorrectly believe in the first doesn’t inherently mean the word can’t describe the second. Although I would agree that just saying “sexism against men” is usually better

upvote 1 downvote