Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Ease tell me if I’m crazy, but has anyone else noticed the pattern of extreme size difference mlm media where the larger one is clearly depicted to be the masculine man figure, and the smaller/skinnier one depicted to be more feminine
upvote 82 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

AND IF THERES AN ASIAN, HES IS ***ALWAYS*** THE BOTTOM?! AND IF THERES A BLACK MAN HES ***ALWAYS*** the top?!

upvote 46 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

No clue why it’s downvoted, this is such a common trope especially in mlm media written by people who aren’t gay men, they maybe subconsciously make one of the guys big and buff and manly and the other small and weak and submissive. While bear/twink and dom/sub relationships exist irl and are valid (hate that word) in media written by ppl who aren’t gay men, you can kinda get the vibe that they’re using those dynamics to replicate a hetero one

upvote 42 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Not because it’s wrong to be feminine, but because writers explicitly write them that way to appease to heterosexual gender norms?

upvote 32 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Or Am I just crazy

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Lowkey? If we’re gonna have a more masc and more fem one i want the big top to be the fem one and the small bottom to be the masc one. Or like, small fem top. Please I need more of it GIMME SOME VARIETY!!! And also like,,,, feed into my kinks, a small fem dom top would cure me I think

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I’m starting to see it everywhere, even subtly with shows like heated rivalries

upvote 25 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

YES! Your personality and mannerisms are not directly tied to your sexual position, to think so is idiotic.

upvote 11 downvote