LGBTQIA+ on Sidechat | Shold the U.S. constitution be amended to effectively ban capitalism by requiring that all businesses be either owned by their employees, or owned by their customers or both, depending on what makes sense for each business?

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

LGBTQIA+ 6w

Shold the U.S. constitution be amended to effectively ban capitalism by requiring that all businesses be either owned by their employees, or owned by their customers or both, depending on what makes sense for each business?

-16

Anonymous 6w

dude holy shit shut the fuck up with this stuff already. nobody wants to here it here. You know this already. why the fuck do you keep posting stuff here when people clearly don’t want it.

Anonymous 6w

dawg read the fucking room. nobody wants to answer politcal questions here, especially hyper specific scenarios and then go on and on about hyper specifics. its something literally nobody besides you wants in here because it isnt a place for hyper specific political stuff.

Anonymous 6w

What’s your obsession with posting these really hyper specific questions lol

Anonymous 5w

I’m not sure this is the community for such a question (I recommend checking out any politics related community instead) but my gut answer is that I’m not sure how what you’re describing would “effectively ban capitalism.” Like we’d still be in a free-market society with private ownership of property and corporations, there’d just be some unconventional laws around workers compensation.

Anonymous 5w

Can you just read Marx and stop being stupid

Anonymous 6w

I see no mention of sexuality and gender. No one is telling this person they are off topic. So why am I being singled out.

-5

Anonymous

#2 6w

Short answer: Asking hyper specific questions is what I do. It’s how I communicate with people.

-4

Anonymous

#1 6w

So how come people can make political statements, but I can’t ask political questions. Make it make sense.

-11

Anonymous

OP 6w

They post things about sex and gender that are political. Not this stuff

Anonymous

#3 6w

I read something about how lots of LGBT+ people are against capitalism. It seems relevant to me.

-9

Anonymous

OP 6w

Ok cool. Thats still not the same thing?

Anonymous

OP 5w

You must be fun at parties

Anonymous

#4 5w

I can’t express myself how I want in real life.

-3

Anonymous

OP 5w

That persons take is very basic and not a complex hyper political question. That person was making more of a statement that is very easy to agree with. You are asking a question nobody in this community wants to think about or answer.

Anonymous

#4 5w

Maybe I’m misreading them but that seems like a really unagreeable take to me. If what they’re trying to say is that no old person should be *forced* to work then sure, that’s pretty uncontroversial (or at least it should be) but they seem to be saying that we shouldn’t *allow* old people to work.

Anonymous

#5 5w

Rereading your comment the second suggestion is a lot more radical than I realized at first glance. What exactly would it look like for the customers of a company to own that company? Like legally speaking, what exactly is it that you’re proposing?