LGBTQIA+ on Sidechat | The idea of “afab” only spaces sounds great in theory until you get to the part of how the fuck you plan to enforce it. Are terfs really advocating for genital inspection? Just let trans people exist

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

LGBTQIA+ 2w

The idea of “afab” only spaces sounds great in theory until you get to the part of how the fuck you plan to enforce it. Are terfs really advocating for genital inspection? Just let trans people exist

Anonymous 2w

agab spaces are inherently bioesentalist ngl

Anonymous 2w

it doesn’t even sound great in theory

Anonymous 2w

Im literally saying terfs make no sense because genitalia doesnt define gender and im getting argued with? I am literally trans and said it only sounds good in simple theory because if you, the average person, understand genitals to mean gender then it sounds great. But to the person who reads anything beyond that in theory it sounds terrible which is what i said 😭

Anonymous

#1 2w

True, but my point is the idea of protecting women is good but they literally reinforce the same stereotypes of what a woman is that they claim to want to get rid of by claiming womanhood is based on genitals when rather its based on who identifies as a woman

Anonymous

OP 2w

“woman” and “afab” aren’t interchangeable

Anonymous

#1 2w

Thats what i just said. I said womanhood isnt based on genitals.

Anonymous

#1 2w

I think you’re misinterpreting what im saying. Thats why i said in theory. Because when you actually understand what that means in praxis it makes no sense because genitalia doesnt define gender.

Anonymous

OP 2w

you said "the idea of "afab" only spaces sounds great in theory" and then in your response to me said "my point is that the idea of protecting women is good," so while you say you're objecting to defining womanhood by genitals, you're the one who conflated the two.

Anonymous

#2 2w

True

Anonymous

#2 2w

exactly.

Anonymous

#1 2w

Whyd you block me for two days dude 💀

-1