
Genuine question, where do I get trustworthy updates on how present covid is? I know the cdc has lied about it in the past, but I heard that from others online and don’t know where to figure that out on my own. It’s selfish, but I have extremely debilitating social anxiety and when I don’t have concrete proof and know for certain that masks are fully necessary, the anxiety from sticking out for something that “isn’t an issue anymore” becomes stronger than my want to mask
the problem is that in the US, extremely little covid tracking is being done in general. there’s no clinical testing infrastructure left, hospitals haven’t been required to report cases since May 2024, and very few wastewater monitoring programs (which Would be the most effective tool for determining infection rates by area) remain—there aren’t any reliable comprehensive nationwide data reporting sites because there are so few ongoing data sources to collect from (1/2)
but to be clear, this doesn’t indicate anything about the actual state of viral circulation over here, it’s just the Trump administration playing “if we ignore it then we can pretend we ‘beat’ it” (alongside a host of other similarly cynical & counterproductive motives) but if you need evidence that it’s still a problem, every few months or so there are still reports on surges / spikes coming out of popular & well-known national news outlets. I’ll link some recent ones below (2/2)
https://www.axios.com/2025/11/08/covid-cases-symptoms-variants-november-2025 https://parade.com/health/most-common-covid-symptoms-november-2025 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/covid-is-beginning-to-surge-globally-what-are-the-symptoms-and-how-serious/ https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/covid-is-surging-again-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-vaccine/2025/09
unfortunately if you look into the specifics, the CDC’s wastewater monitoring program has less and less reporting centers to operate off of at this point. this means areas marked as low-transmission are often an indication of insubstantial data rather than an accurate representation of circulation levels
also worth mentioning that masking isn’t *only* a necessity during surges—in fact, part of the reason we’ve ended up in this pattern of frequent recurring surges is because tons of people totally abandon precautions once the rate of transmission seems to have decreased slightly. the all-or-nothing mentality creates a vicious cycle
so a more functional & appropriate model of risk assessment-based decision-making might look like 1) avoiding crowded dense indoor events during peak transmission but still attending (masked) the rest of the time, or 2) loosening up your masking standards for *outdoor* spaces when we aren’t in a surge period (you can still catch it outdoors, but it’s much less likely, except for in crowded areas)
yeah, they’ve stayed awfully quiet about the dataset progressively shrinking, the map is set up to make it look like they have info on more regions than they really do. I had to look up the site for my county’s wastewater program just to learn that my area (which contains a major progressive-leaning city, even) wasn’t actually being reported anymore
I had social anxiety (recently stopped fitting the diagnostic criteria) and while standing out has been hard (though more people are masking now than in the last few years because being sick and missing class/work/special events isn't worth it in general) I think being able to hide whatever facial expressions I might be making that would make me feel like I'm standing out anyway is helpful in my recovery. I make jewelry for my masks (mask chains) that make it feel happier to wear it.
another note about wastewater, it's estimated to only detect 40%-80% of cases present in the area being monitored Walgreens has brought back info on how many people getting tested are positive but that only reflects the people with the privilege to afford it, aren't living in denial, and the up to 60(?)% of people who are not getting a false negative on RAT I run linktr.ee/maskingappalachia which has some info focused on debunking & showing that actually we are all varying levels of vulnerable
oh and as for data visibility manipulation, the CDC wastewater map has had the color changed mant times to make people feel less alarmed when looking at it, and instead of being done on the actual numbers (which were repeatedly manipulated to show higher numbers as lower risk) it's done on a curve now so that there is always an area of "low" levels when it's actually just showing low in comparison to others