Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Why do Libs love having more compassion for violent criminals than the victim themselves. Ex. Look at all the r gangs in the UK, beheadings in Ireland, murderers in the US
upvote -12 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

What is this referring to

upvote 33 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

what is this supposed to mean? I don’t think anyone likes murderers and gangs who isn’t a murderer or in a gang. Is this a roundabout complaint about judicial policies?

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Dudes just a conservative nut job, not even trying to hide it. Blocking you!

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

it doesn't sound like you're liberal on most things if you're using the term "Libs"

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

what are your thoughts on Kyle Rittenhouse

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

Self defense against aggressor. ^ examples were all unprovoked violent crimes (the r gangs in UK even actively seek out their sick acts)

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

Like what are some specific examples you can think of

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

The recent beheadings in Ireland. The liberal judges/government in the UK allowing r gangs for years and punishing victims more for speaking out(Lowe parliamentary report). US liberal judges allowing criminals (iryna zarutska’s murder-more recent example) to be free because they feel bad for them

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Where “minorities” get special treatment in courts by liberal judges

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

I’m liberal on most things but this I really can’t comprehend

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1d

Libs=liberals maga= conservatives what’s your point

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

You do realise that “incompetent to stand trial” isn’t “let free” right?

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

Like they’re likely going to hold the perpetrator in a mental hospital until he’s either fit to stand trial, or kept there basically forever. They have video evidence of him committing murder, they’re not going to let him walk? Honestly making him stand while in a mental health crisis may be worse!! Juries aren’t going to want to sentence a visibly mentally ill man to death, especially if it seems he does not know what’s happening.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1d

Even the worst people deserve a right to a fair trial, and they’ve determined right now that his trial would not be fair

upvote 14 downvote