Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
boy i’d sure like to know how the supreme court decided the equal protection clause applies to gay people but not trans people🙄the celebratory posts seem extremely hollow
upvote 176 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

there's no actual legalistic reasoning behind it, the supreme court is purely a political instrument. the tide is currently against trans people and is not (yet, in their estimation) against all gay people, so for now the existing law stays. the minute they think that has changed, they'll find a case to take up about it

upvote 47 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2d

It’s about politics but also precedent, in this case specifically. I feel less celebration and more relief, that an already won victory is safe. Overturning a past landmark case is harder than setting a new one.

upvote 38 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2d

which is sort of my point. It’s not really a victory

upvote 40 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2d

I agree completely

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2d

it wouldn’t be if the democrats actually fought for us instead of caring the moment something has 51% support

upvote 18 downvote