
Nuance is to give extra information in regards to a topic that may not be specifically clarified in the broad discussion of said topic… and if you’re the person, I think you are then I’m talking to… the nuance I added, was for you to ask yourself whether or not you had a bias against male beauty… I didn’t tell you that you did you’re assuming that… and we could have a conversation about the actual material but you want to keep going on tangents about shit that I’m not saying
Do you not think that there’s people that have a bias against male beauty that could be having a conversation on the Internet with me right now… if so, why do you think that it’s not fair for me to ask that question?… also why are you held up by the fact that I asked that question in the first place it’s not that serious.
I did not ignore her point. I acknowledged it and asked a follow up question: whether it might stem from a bias against male beauty. That was it, the only follow up. No one else has offered any other experiences for me to respond to, just arguments over the semantics of what I said.
The only point you’ve made so far is criticizing me for assuming she has a bias against male beauty, and picking apart the semantics of what I said.. even after I clarified what I meant by what I said. You haven’t offered anything of substance related to the actual discussion. Zero points outside of semantics.
All you’ve been doing is assuming things I’m not saying and arguing against those things. Then telling me I’m wrong, when I could absolutely be wrong if we were actually discussing what I’m wrong about. But instead you’re arguing against things I’m not saying, and arguing with me over what I mean by things I never said