
I agree the holocaust comparisons are oftentimes used badly but also I was walking through Yad V’Shem last April and couldn’t get over how similar it was to current events up until the part where the ghettos were established and some of the shit trump’s been doing seem like he took direct influence from Hitler’s rise to power.
This is what I’m getting at with my comment. The MAGA party has spent a couple decades cooking using immigrants (specifically latine immigrants) (and also most other marginalized groups but mostly the immigrants) as a scapegoat. They attempted a coup, they’re attempting to change the constitution to keep Trump and give him more authoritarian power, they’re actively kidnapping people and deporting them or putting them in detention centers without trial. Like it’s at the point where there def
It is minimizing. Stop universalizing antisemitism. Stop using Jewish trauma as a measuring tool while not even including Jews in the conversation. A lot of these things are inaccurate too like claiming there weren’t camps in Germany when there was or saying it started with deportations when it didn’t. You can legitimize trump’s anti-Hispanic racism without making Holocaust comparisons
I’m not claiming it’s the same it absolutely is not. but when I read the experiences of the holocaust from diary entries and stuff that’s put in museums or looking at the warning signs that existed in nazi germany, it is similar to today. It’s definitely not the same, like MAGA is way messier than the nazis about who they’re targeting, but there are detention centers that people are being kidnapped and taken to and being held in for indefinite periods of time. And trumps attempts to install
Himself as an authoritarian dictator look a lot like Hitler’s. This is less of a “oh it’s as bad as the holocaust” and more of a “I think there are enough nazis in this administration taking direct influence from nazis that you can predict what they’re gonna do by studying Nazi germany”
I’m not going to compare the atrocity of the holocaust to anything else. Every atrocity is different and unique and deserves to be studied on its own. However, studying past atrocities can help us predict and prevent future atrocities. The holocaust was the first industrialized genocide and the Nazis ideology is still popular in the US today. It seems that the Trump administration might attempt an industrial scale genocide of their own, and by their actions, it seems they may be heavily inspired
You’re completely right. And when I do study the holocaust, I do not generally compare it to other regimes and genocide (with the exception of maybe past pogroms of Jews motivated by similar ideologies). When I am researching the actions of the Trump regime and actions of ICE today, however, I use my knowledge of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust to better understand what is currently happening and what might happen next. And when I am having that conversation outside of Jewish spaces (rare),
I feel like many people don’t mention Jews. They say “camps” but not how Jews were put there. They’ll say “deportations” but not that it was Jews abducted. They’ll say “smear campaign” but not that it was an antisemitic campaign. The list goes on. They invoke certain components to the Holocaust without showing the full picture, not presenting the facts, and not including Jews. Some lies are placed to fit their comparative narrative.
I agree. Most of the time holocaust comparisons are invoked carelessly and in a way that does minimize the Holocaust. That is why I usually don’t have that conversation when I am the only Jew in the room or when I think the people around me cannot handle that comparison respectfully. But that doesn’t mean it cannot or should not be done respectfully.
I mean of course people aren’t making the comparison to the Rwandan genocide? First off it is just a lot less comparable than the lead up to the Holocaust is but, like, more to the point: how many people do you know who have even close to enough knowledge about the Rwandan genocide to compare it to anything?