Anonymous #1 4w

If you’re referring to any child as an adult imma need your computer seized and your hard drive searched IMMEDIATELY

31

Anonymous OP 4w

I mean, depends on the context tbh cause not every person who uses it uses it in the pedophillic sense.

3

Anonymous #2 4w

It also depends on region. “Young man/woman,” is a common formal way of saying child in my area.

25

Anonymous OP 4w

Immediately there is no reason a child should be referred to as an adult.

5

Anonymous #3 4w

No it’s not because why is child ever referred to as a man/woman when they aren’t an adult yet.

4

Anonymous #1 4w

Ppl don’t refer to children as an adult because they see them as one, they do it out of affection. It’s like seeing an 11 year old in a business suit. Ppl would call him a lil man. Not because he is an adult but because he is wearing something linked to being an adult

0

Anonymous #2 4w

But everything in context ultimately

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Like my grandma would call me a lil man after I came back in from helping my father with the garden outside. It’s not that I’m an adult, it’s that I did something that is associated with adults.

3

Anonymous #2 4w

No, you don’t get to do that or say that. When these men call these child girls, “womanly” or “woman-like”, “mature for your” they are trying to erase their childless to excuse themselves for their inappropriate behavior. They only do it to girls and not boys a child is a child not a young adult. A young lady is 16 and up till she’s 20 cause not a woman yet, lady is more youthful than woman. So skipping lady and going to woman is purposely to mature the child.

5

Anonymous #1 4w

I mean yeah when the creepy men do it absolutely but I was saying in context. Not every situation is gonna be the same where it’s sometimes appropriate and sometimes not.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

You and OP are out of your minds. There is no gender divide here I’ve been called a young man literally hundreds of times. There is nothing inherently creepy about saying young woman or young man. You are literally just inventing problems.

9

Anonymous #4 4w

Being called a young man when you aren’t a man but a child is placating, you weren’t a man at the time. And also that’s kind how abuse starts the small seed, they get you thinking well they don’t see me as child so I’m obviously different, cause kids are easy to manipulate. Why is anyone calling a child an adult.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

When someone goes on tv and says “that young woman should be required to carry that baby to term” when in reality they’re referring to an 11 year old child there’s something wrong with

13

Anonymous OP 4w

Well f***ing OBVIOUSLY there’s something wrong with them. But it definitely isn’t that they called the girl a young woman. I feel like I’m taking crazy pills here. This is such a non issue.

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Idek what you’re trying to say.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

If it’s a non issue why did you comment, I’m clearly against calling children young men or young women cause they aren’t. If you can’t get that okay, bye.

5

Anonymous #4 4w

You might be because on no earth would I even want to seem like I’m defending pedophiles but here you are with not on but two comments that could be interpreted as supporting them. Any language that is used to remove the innocence of children to make them seem more grown up is disgustingly wrong and should not be normalized

8

Anonymous OP 4w

Yeah of course but that’s the context with it. A grandma calling her grandson a young man for doing garden work isn’t out of pedophilic intent. Context is important in all of this, it can’t be a blanket statement

4

Anonymous #2 4w

See it’s not a blanket statement though I specifically said “pro-life pedos” not “gramma gardening in the back yard”

12

Anonymous #2 4w

But why not call him a big boy why call him a man, he’s fucking 7 helping dad, his a big boy or a good helper but he’s not a little man, that’s not cute.

10

Anonymous OP 4w

When pedophiles use it to remove the innocence it is obviously wrong but not every person uses it in that way.

14

Anonymous #2 4w

Me personally I tend to avoid doing anything that might seem like having a pedophilic connotation but if you don’t have a problem with a pedophile agreeing with you when children are involved then I guess bro

7

Anonymous #1 4w

If the underlying message is the same why would the word choice really matter? Not every person speaks the same way

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Anything can have a pedophillic connotation depending on the situation. That is what words are.

6

Anonymous #2 4w

Because one is used to defend underage sexual misconduct and the other is an innocent term for a child

6

Anonymous #2 4w

Damn what a crazy world we live in now that people genuinely are defending pedophiles

4

Anonymous #2 4w

Yes the word choice does matter, because being called a woman before I ever was does leave an impression upon that child. Being told since 11 that I was growing woman when I wasn’t made me tolerate inappropriate comments at that age when i shouldn’t have, because children are impressionable.

4

Anonymous OP 4w

A grandma calling her grandson a lil man isn’t her defending sexual misconduct. It’s context that is important in judging these situations

7

Anonymous #2 4w

Crazy that this is the hill you die on pedo

0

Anonymous OP 4w

Where am I defending pedophiles? I’m saying how the context of how ppl use it is important.

6

Anonymous OP 4w

If that is how you accept that other ppl see things differently then you do you man.

2

Anonymous OP 4w

You are probably the most delusional person I’ve come across on this app

-3

Anonymous #4 4w

Contestant number two on the all new game show “what’s on your computer hard drive!”

5

Anonymous #4 4w

“Come on down . . . Explain to the audience why it’s okay to call a child a young woman don’t shy on the details now” . . .

5

Anonymous #1 4w

Make sure to not leave out the part where you specifically explain in detail what exactly makes an 11 year old an adult

5

Anonymous OP 4w

Nobody here is saying an 11yr old is an adult twn. This just embarrassing on your part.

2

Anonymous #2 4w

Umm not even 30 mins ago you typed “what’s the context with it”, what is ever the context with calling an 11 yr old an adult. Thats what OP and I are getting at there is never context to calling an 11 yr old an adult (young woman or young man).

4

Anonymous OP 4w

Are you on drugs? Because if this is your brain at max capacity I don’t understand how you’re alive.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

If you saw my first message, ppl don’t call them that because they actually are, it’s because what they are doing is that of a grown up nature. I was called a young man all the time growing up and I never cared. I enjoyed it when my grandma saw me as a grown up cause that meant I was helping her and felt special. If we just have different experiences then we will never agree

1

Anonymous #2 4w

I’m not a women so I can’t comment on what they might experent but I can comment from I have experienced.

1

Anonymous #1 4w

Sometimes I call my dog my baby. Can you comprehend the idea that I don’t actually think my dog is a human baby?

5

Anonymous #2 4w

You’re clinging to that but I’m not talking about mamaw saying that I’m talking Mike Johnson saying that to justify child sex abuse though

2

Anonymous OP 4w

Yeah it’s an issue when used to justify child sex abuse obviously I hope what I was saying didn’t insinuate otherwise

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Yah that’s why I said pedos and not gramma in the backyard

4

Anonymous #2 4w

That’s what you are discounting you are saying ppl don’t call them that because that’s what they are but I’m saying because ppl call them that some children start to believe it, which leads to the ppl with mal intentions taking advantage of them. I’m glad it never happened to you but it’s not a universal experience. The 11 yr girl is somehow always a woman in the news but 11 yr old boy is always a child. We don’t live in a world where everyone gets the same benefit of the doubt.

5

Anonymous #4 4w

I actually hate that lot it pisses me off, lol so I’m not the one to say that to because it ain’t your baby and you are delusional it’s your pet.

3

Anonymous #5 4w

Pro-life until it’s out of the womb and then it’s just another mouth to feed and how dare the government have any responsibility with that

9

Anonymous #6 4w

And I care about all people inside the womb and out, I am actively raising money to help the human trafficking situation in Ukraine right now and always try to do what I can to help the people in this world

-1

Anonymous OP 4w

Don’t try to retcon your position. You said anyone who calls a young girl a young woman is a pedo. Obviously a pedo calling a young girl a woman is creepy. But that’s mostly because everything a pedo says is creepy. But it is laughably ridiculous to act like someone using the term “young woman” makes them a pedo, which is the claim you were making.

0

Anonymous #4 4w

Ain’t reconning anything that’s your guys’ job to say one and then back up and say something else once you start losing which you’re doing right here. If you scroll up you can very clearly see that I said pedos calling children women in order to legitimize being sick fucks is disgusting but not once did I say mamaw is a pedo for saying that. If you want to make shit up you’re going to have to try harder than that

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Dude you said I was a pedo for disagreeing with you. Literally said you want to check my hard drive.

3

Anonymous #4 4w

Omg its a joke. Its a joke. Not every single thing thats said online needs to be worded perfectly to address your personal experience. We were talking about fucking pedos in the public eye. You bean souped it, fought way too hard, and got made fun of. Jesus fucking christ.

2

Anonymous #7 4w

Idk what you mean by “we” as you literally haven’t been involved in this conversation at all. I encourage you to go back and actually read it and see that you are wrong. Even if it was a joke (which it simply was not), I personally don’t think accusing someone of pedophilia is a funny joke. Maybe I’m just old fashioned.

0

Anonymous #4 4w

So in this situation, you know exactly who is saying the term and what they’re using it for. “B-but my grandma!!!” “B-but i-i call my dog b-baby!!” Fucking fall on a dick, no one cares!!’ no one was talking about that.

6

That simply is not what is being discussed. I’m sorry you’re so angry and unintelligent.

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

Pro life but not pro women means youre a fucking idiot. Sorry but no amount of nuance makes “pro life” anything besides sexist bullshit

10

Anonymous #6 4w

If you disagree, give your kidney to a dying person rn. You no longer own your body and anyone can force you into procedures without your consent. Thats what you guys want, right?

7

Anonymous #8 4w

If you think that then fine, but I’m pro life and pro woman and if you think otherwise then okay

-2

Anonymous #8 4w

I can’t give a kidney because only one of mine actually works.

-2

Anonymous #6 4w

Doesnt matter, your body isnt yours. Youre pro life, so why dont you want to save the person?? Youre pro murder!!

2

Anonymous #6 4w

(If its not clear im showing how fucking stupid your rhetoric sounds by applying it as a universal rule)

3

Anonymous #8 4w

Ok so by me not being able to give a kidney bc I only have one that works that makes me a pro murder? I’m pro life, for everyone and if that’s ur logic I’m not even gonna argue because you won’t listen to anything I have to say. And my body is mine but when there’s a unique set of dna in the womb that’s not my body, bc that’s not my dna. If a pregnant woman gets killed it’s a double homicide, but if a woman has an abortion she praised for murdering a child?

-2

Anonymous #8 4w

Reread what I said in my initial post

-2

Anonymous #6 4w

Imma stop you right there to explain why it’s double homicide and not murder. Murder involves purposely intent of killing born individuals a zygote, embryo, fetus is not considered born because it wouldn’t be viable. Double homicide ehem homi means human, cide means death, death of a human. Humans can only give birth to humans just in case you think otherwise. Chris Watts if charged properly would be a double murder his born kids and a double homicide wife and unborn child.

7

Anonymous #6 4w

Why do you think you should have a choice here? Im confused. I should have the right to force you to give up your body regardless of any harm that may come to you because of it, no? Its to save someone else, so it cancels it out, right? This is pro life!

4

Anonymous #6 4w

But he is most likely being charged a triple murder and they will not bother with the charging of the double homicide for the unborn child because triple murder is worse in sentencing.

1

Anonymous #6 4w

Like why does your body and health matter if someone elses life is at stake? Literally why would that mean anything here

6

Anonymous #1 4w

Ok I am glad we agree that there were two humans killed the mother and the baby and then another, his other child. If he gets charged properly then he should spend life in prison. No chance of parole. People like that should never step foot on this earth again. When he dies he will be judged and he will likely burn in hell forever unless he gets right with god and gives his life to him.

-1

Anonymous #8 4w

So actually you can’t force somebody to make a medical decision that will kill them. And also you have to find a match for these people. Even if I were to give my single kidney it would likely not be a match for them and they would be in an even worse position then before. But by all means keep talking nonsense because nothing that you said actually makes sense to what I’ve been saying. I will not continue to argue with you because it’s simply not worth my time especially if you’re just gonna

-1

Anonymous #8 4w

Blab and spew nonsense

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

it’s your lack of understanding that’s the problem; if they charged properly it wouldn’t be a triple homicide, it would be double homicide and double murder but because they forego the existence of the unborn and make the existence of the woman more important because it is why triple murder has a harsher penalty than double murder and double homicide. Because the born are more important than the unborn.

2

Anonymous #1 4w

I’m not arguing with you anymore, if you can’t understand what I said in my initial post don’t bother to respond. Bc nothing you said had anything to do with my post.

-2

Anonymous #6 4w

You literally said if a pregnant woman gets killed it’s a double homicide but a woman gets an abortion she’s celebrated for murdering her child. I corrected you and informed you about the definition of a double homicide and murder, cause you use words you don’t know. Stop using words you don’t know because abortion is not murder because for it to be murder it has to born and be alive outside the womb.

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Omg sorry I thought you were the other person😭 but thank you for correcting me again. I know what they are but I’m just saying it’s two people being killed and not just one. That was the point I’m making. Still murder either way. And murder is the intentional taking of someone’s life. Abortion is intentional not accidental like a miscarriage

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

Buts it’s not murder that’s what you aren’t understanding, for murder to be conceptualized it must be born alive. You can’t murder something that’s not born and living, you don’t call a stillborn a murder it’s born but not living, it is a homicide, it’s the death of a human but it’s not a murder. There are specific qualifications for something to be a murder in 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree. Abortion literally doesn’t qualify as a murder.

6

Anonymous #1 4w

If a child is born dead then obviously it’s not murder, it’s just an accidental death, a miscarriage, or stillborn. Abortion is murder because it’s intentional. You wouldn’t kill a dog w puppies and say oh well they weren’t puppies bc they weren’t out of the womb. They were still killed along w the mom. Homicide is pretty much just saying someone was murdered. Maybe abortion doesn’t qualify as murder to you, but it does to me because I believe every child has the right to life no matter how they

-2

Anonymous #6 4w

Were conceived

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

I’m interested to hear if you’re willing to pay extra taxes for universal school meals and universal nonprivitized healthcare and other social welfare and safety net programs

5

Anonymous #6 4w

Wow you really want to double down on the word murder - when someone is charged with involuntary or voluntary manslaughter there is still a homicide hello manslaughter but it’s not a murder. You are fighting so hard for a a word you refuse to acknowledge the definition for because you know it will not justify your beliefs for abortion. Find another word but it’s not murder.

6

Anonymous OP 4w

And the passage of common sense gun laws

11

Anonymous #6 4w

Youre not understanding. Your body, MY CHOICE babe. It doesnt matter what you want or if your health will be affected, your body is not YOURS. Whats not clicking? Or are you… disagreeing? Saying people shouldnt have that right and should own their own bodies????

1

Anonymous #6 4w

Also; youre a dunce if you think pregnancy doesnt change and cause bodily changes that can absolutely kill a person. Its an entire body thats changing and plenty of women develop chronic health problems from it. You missed that entire point (not shocking, folks like you tend to struggle with that)

3

Anonymous #6 4w

And stillborn isn’t an accident death, accidental death is a cause of death; the noted cause of death for a stillborn is stillbirth. Accidental death is completely different usually banking on negligence.

4

Anonymous #6 4w

Anti choicers will look you dead in the face and say “yeah kids should be forced to carry and birth rape/incest babies that can kill them” and then wonder why theyre not being called “pro life” anymore lmao. Lost fucking cause

8

Anonymous OP 4w

Can you elaborate? Just so I have a better understanding of what you’re asking me?

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

This is from the DOJ

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

This is def of homicide

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

Murder is inherently human in nature, you can’t murder a pet or anything that isn’t human. So murder can only be applicable between persons and persons are human beings, so find where I said they weren’t. I even said human beings can only give birth to humans. Homicide and murder can only be applied to humans doesn’t change anything I said.

6

Anonymous #6 4w

Im asking why youre against forceful organ donation if youre “pro life”. Why do you get to deny someone else life just because you dont WANT to? Why would it matter if your health would be affected? Its never mattered for pregnant women, im just lost why you care so much (id assume its because it involves you and not your idea of women that “deserve it”)

1

Anonymous #6 4w

What would your reaction be if universal meals were granted to any child at schools, healthcare no longer left the average American at the mercy of giant corporations, social programs were enacted to those marginalized by society, and common sense gun laws were passed to improve background checks, make sure domestic offenders were unable to obtain firearms, felons couldn’t commit firearms, and automatic weapons are not allowed in civilian hands. All this but it meant more taxes for you.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Problem is even WITH all that, its still inhumane to force women to give birth against their will. And OP clearly agrees that loss of bodily autonomy is bad, but only when it applies to them LOL. Its only about controlling WOMENS bodies. They dont give a shit about women nor children once theyre born

1

Anonymous #8 4w

Dawg what

1

Anonymous #8 4w

I never said anything like that

1

Anonymous #6 4w

Your definition isn’t blown up so we can’t read but here is a large one. Because homicide isn’t always murder.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Im referring to #6, not you, sorry

3

Anonymous #8 4w

Ohh gotcha you scared me for a second lmao I never want to be confused for one of them

3

Anonymous OP 4w

I personally agree with everything you said there, yes taxes would go up but if it means children can eat at school (hopefully it’s better than what I had in school), healthcare was better and hopefully cheaper, AND gun laws were improved then I would pay it. I think it’s way too easy for people to get a gun and there definitely needs to be a stricter setting on getting guns. Gun violence has gone up way too much and it needs to be addressed, so yes definitely agree with background checks 100%

1

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m not sure abt social programs, are you talking like clubs or something like that or non profits? Or?

1

Anonymous #6 4w

Oh wow that was a surprising response good for you dude

3

Anonymous #8 4w

Dawg what drugs are you on? Please stop taking them

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Thank you, I really want this country to get better and I want my future kids to be safe and not have to worry abt school shooting and I want them to have actual food served at school bc the crap they gave me was cruising on barely edible.. it was horrible cause why was I served spongy eggs

6

Anonymous #1 4w

No homicide isn’t always murder, there are exceptions to it. There’s excused and not excused. If someone is killed in self defense it’s considered a homicide but dismissed because of the self defense laws. Like in Alabama we have the stand your ground law. But in the case I was talking about it would be considered murder

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

No it wouldn’t be murder, I’m going to end it here because you believe in good for other things like children being taken care of and gun laws. An abortion in Wyoming isn’t going to affect you, an abortion in Illinois isn’t going to affect you, hell an abortion in Tuscaloosa will not affect you in Montgomery. But your willful ignorance about women and our bodies will affect women across the country. You get pregnant or someone pregnant you deal with it, but you don’t tell someone else how to.

7

Anonymous #1 4w

I’m not telling someone what to do I just fight for what I believe is right. And yes I think we should end it here because I feel like we’ve gone in circles and haven’t gotten anywhere. My initial post was agree with OP and I had just said my opinion and my stance. Had I not said I was pro life I wouldn’t have gotten this hate from some people. Have a great day

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

Ok but the thing youre fighting for is… taking peoples bodily rights away. And yeah no shit sherlock, what you believe in is a harmful, hateful thing that kills people. Welcome to the fucking world, where actions have consequences. Have the life you deserve

2

Anonymous #6 4w

Great, you care for the kids unless theyre female and get raped

5

Anonymous #8 4w

I’m not even talking to you and you just keep talking.. give it up already nobody’s talking to you and you’re taking things I’ve said and OP has said into left field

1