Anonymous #1 7w

Just try to stay in the know people, I know it sucks and it’s probably what ya don’t want to hear but just stay in the know. This as corrupt as it gets. Btw they won’t be audited for any of the years prior to the date the arrangement get signed so for example Sep 10th 2026 and anytime before.

32

Anonymous #1 7w

we aren’t angry enough, we are being cowardly. we’ve waited long enough for the supreme court and congress to step in but they ain’t doing SHIT. we need to hold trump and his clan accountable b/c no one else will and it’s only going to get worse tbh

19

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

EEEYUCK

38

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

can you give us any logical reasons why you still think this way?

34

Anonymous OP 7w

You can’t even call yourself a republican in good faith if you’re MAGA… true republicans have been dying out ever since Reagan

34

Anonymous #1 7w

You’ve got it wrong and are parroting misinformation. It is to stop the IRS from prosecuting any past tax claims prior to the settlement date. It’s not an ongoing blanket “pardon” and created a fund in the defense of anyone who has been “targeted” by the government. That fact that you don’t know this and report false truths to others is CONCERNING.

2

Anonymous #3 7w

“Everything I don’t like is AI and Israel” I wish I could be so naïve

-2

Anonymous #6 7w

Bruh that’s not even what I said and tell me it’s wrong instead of just saying “heh… naive”

19

Anonymous #3 7w

Mb bro didn’t mean to be so snarky, I just hate political discourse rn

5

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

You’re not the last brother. Few of us, but we’re here

-7

Anonymous #8 7w

🙏 Keep believing in what is right.

-5

Anonymous OP 7w

It pisses me off when people say "we aren't angry enough" ngl it's such virtue signaling. In reality we are TOO angry, and our anger is generally scattered and misdirected, often at each other. What we aren't is passionate enough about liberation. Fear is a terribly unconscious motivator especially when we rationalize our compliance with it. This nation and its nationalism are fundamentally corrupt and the sooner we realize that, the sooner we'll be free from it.

22

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

That's a metaphysical claim.

10

Anonymous #9 7w

“The left will eat their own.” -Charlie Kirk Democrats only exist to tear down progress and leech. They have no ideology. They only hate anything that isn’t them. Because Republicans have grown to be more morally righteous, Democrats find it easier to channel their hate towards each other.

7

Anonymous OP 7w

Yes.

-4

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

You can’t be serious. You are 100% right about the “Democratic” party but you’re also 100% wrong about the Republican party.

10

Comment Deleted

0

Budget cuts 🌈

46

Anonymous #9 7w

Nobody is upvoting and nobody is downvoting… This is good.

4

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

The democrats employ empathy without wisdom. They are easily directed towards chaos because they lack a moral compass. I used to think it was wrong to say someone without religion can’t be moral, but time has shown me I was wrong. These people change their opinions based on a new episode of Billy Nye the Science Goy. The left is reckless.

8

Anonymous #6 7w

I strongly disagree ngl most people do not have empathy, they have sympathy. And THAT is the problem…

9

Anonymous #6 7w

The right is equally reckless the way it misconstrues narratives to demonize queer people and people of color in the name of “national security”

5

Anonymous #9 7w

We do not give a single fuck about anyone’s skin color, we only care about their legal status. If white people are here illegally, and I’m sure there are some, then we want them out too. Liberals just call us racist because it makes us look bad

6

Anonymous #11 7w

I wasn’t talking about immigrants… Maybe you personally don’t think you give a fuck, but that doesn’t mean the republican party didn’t campaign against critical race theory. Liberals call republicans racists because it’s easier than having the compassion to see past biases. And what about queer people? You can’t just pick and choose which of my words you acknowledge.

10

Anonymous #2 7w

What rights have you lost? Genuine question because I always hear people say this but I never really know what they’re talking about

12

Anonymous #9 7w

Most republicans are against queer ppl bc it goes against their beliefs and values, largely bc most conservatives are Christian. As for race, majority of conservatives don’t care about that at all. It’s only the craziest ones that do and we get a bad rep for that, but that’s the same on both sides. And I mean the democrats were the slave owners.. and the republicans did end slavery - if we are looking surface level like you seem to be

-2

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

I think it’s funny how the comments supporting republican claims are always downvoted so no one can see how people truly feel. Freedom of speech right? Oh but the republicans are taking those rights away, right??

5

Anonymous #15 7w

Meanwhile libs want to make it illegal to poo poo their ideas, and if you have a different opinion you’re against human rights

4

Anonymous #6 7w

Who wants that 😭 wake up and smell the propaganda from the rich fucks who are trying to get you to hate other poors and ignore them fucking us all over. Try making a couple new social media accounts and liking different stuff and you’ll be shown a different reality than the one your algorithm has narrowcasted into your brain.

7

Anonymous #15 7w

Umm not trying to hate but: birthright citizenship was almost severely stripped, the right to an abortion is now conditional, our sensitive data is now easily used by almost any company (an actual right we lost/was hella weaken), so so so much more. Ur question could be innocent but in an age of Google and AI you can find thousands of facts and personal stories. No one has an excuse to be ignorant to this.

29

Anonymous #16 7w

Birthright citizenship NEEDS to be reevaluated when it IS being abused. When it was created, the world was a VERY different world from what it is today. It is being completely ABUSED.

-14

Anonymous #15 7w

again, can yall give us any logical reasons while you still support trump?

6

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

this is where the problem resides within us. we still believe it’s left vs. right, dem vs. rep. it’s not, it’s us vs. them, us vs. the billionaires. they WANT us to fight each other

22

bro didn't even use the right "then"

11

Anonymous #9 7w

Nah fuck that shit bro. Gay marriage was legalized and people joked about those who said they would come for the kids, or put it in schools… they said their would never happen… and guess what now… they want children to transition. Fuck you guys and your slippery slope bullshit. Party is over. You give an inch and you guys take a country mile. No more.

-8

Anonymous #15 7w

Exactly liberals are so dumb. And they haven’t changed. They are obsessed with focusing on race, that same spirit still exists within them. They still treat black people like they are to incompetent to register to vote. If that’s an “issue”, why not set up programs to assist with it… oh because they want to leave open these channels of abuse and fraud that they benefit from. They want to keep this wound from healing and push this white guilt slavery trauma bs. No one is denying it happened…

-2

Anonymous #16 7w

Thats why they were asking? So that they weren’t ignorant? Relax, bud.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

The fact that you have so many upvotes shows how stupid and misinformed you liberals are. Voting rights should be revoked.

-6

Anonymous #9 7w

Because welcoming an outright moral degeneracy into society surely wont have any lasting negative effects down the line. I remember when the argument was “bake my cake”, not encouraging easily influenceable populations (youth) that life changing sex change operations are a rational remedy to the common occurrence of struggling to find oneself during puberty. It simply isn’t done.

-2

Anonymous #19 7w

Exactly, their true motives are now out in the open. Screw these people. They want the government to micromanage every level of our lives to force themselves upon us. It’s disgusting.

-2

Comment Deleted

0

Dude out here acting like the dispenser of all wisdom literally crashing out because someone has the audacity to want to know more. Never that serious, bud. Please get a life….

7

Comment Deleted

0

lol right? When you start making sense they suddenly get confused. A bunch of clowns.

9

Reading mistake spotted, i have replied to the wrong comment by mistake, killing myself immediately lol. My mistake.

1

Anonymous #16 7w

Our data is definitely an issue that needs addressed for sure. As for abortion, well the federal government gave that to the states and that’s exactly how it should be. Our federal government shouldn’t have that much control on our lives. Birthright citizenship is a bigger issue, and something I think needs addressed. In my opinion the amendment has been taken out of context and applied to individuals that I don’t think it was originally meant to be applied to. It was written about the slaves

6

Anonymous #16 7w

A huge scandal is the Chinese hiring American surrogates so that their child can have American citizenship. That’s not right at all. That’s not how birthright citizenship should work at all, and in my opinion this is a huge problem. Also, when applied to immigrants many people come here solely to have their child and that’s why we are having so many issues with deportation.

7

Anonymous #6 7w

Additionally, birthright citizenship has NEVER been applied to every child born on US soil. That’s another fact to be inferred when interpreting the right saying that. When ambassadors come here from other countries, when they have children here they are not given citizenship. Why? Bc they aren’t representatives of our country. Why then should people coming here and “just visiting” have their children get citizenship? It doesn’t make sense

0

Republicans didn’t shit the bad this bad last time. Liberals are such babies.

-2

Every presidential term has been getting worse and worse, relaxing is the total opposite of what Americans should be doing. It’s time to stop electing these old men who should be in retirement homes

1

Anonymous #15 7w

Yeah that's also bullshit because half of those values weren't even those of Christ himself. Modern "Christianity" (which is really just catholicism, monotheism, and orthodoxy in general) doesn't even follow the being it was named for. Christ did NOT preach orthodoxy aka "correct belief" nonono he preached orthoPRAXY aka "correct practice" which was to love thy neighbor AS thyself, love God (which is the same thing), gather, and heal. Those are not things you believe, those are things you DO.

5

Anonymous #15 7w

Modern Christianity doesn't follow Christ, it worships its own infrastructure. Gnosticism has a name for that: the demiurge. A deceived perception of the divine. The idea that God is masculine is also total bullshit. During the Renaissance Christ's wound was often depicted as a vulva and the blood compared to mother's milk and some artists even wrote off Jesus AS mother. Your traditions were not the first. The Bible literally shows itself erasing Asherah, the divine feminine.

2

Anonymous #6 7w

This is the most concentrated pure version of the stereotypical homophobic strawman lmao you parrot fabricated narratives to make your metaphysical claims sound like facts. You want logic and reasoning about morality? Look to Immanuel Kant, often considered a father of modern ethics (although Deleuze says more about institutions and is imho more important). Your reasoning fails Kant's maxims.

11

Anonymous #6 7w

Giving people freedom is not even remotely close to forcing anything on anyone diva you are so silly

8

Anonymous #9 7w

I won’t engage with you how you want me to because you fail to acknowledge truth. People did laugh if you presumed they would push LGBT influence in schools. People said it was, silly and “homophobic” and they only want marriage and cakes. Now allowing sex changes on minors is the new push. You sound like a pseud, you just throw out the name of a philosopher and fail to apply it to the arguments. Get over yourself. Where is the application you nonce.

-4

Anonymous #9 7w

Yeah no.. you’ve got it ALL wrong. There is a lot of modern “Christianity” that’s super demonic and against Christ. It’s literally in the Bible with the holy trinity that Jesus is a man. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. And my comment had zero reason for you to attack Christianity. Everyone has a problem with my religion, but praise those that worship a man who married a 9 year old? Like what

-2

Anonymous #6 7w

Application, since you asked. Kant’s categorical imperative says act only on maxims you could will as universal law, and treat people as ends, never merely as means. Denying trans people healthcare to enforce your comfort with gender norms uses them as a means to your ideological end. That’s the textbook failure, not mine.

8

Anonymous #6 7w

Also “slippery slope” is a named logical fallacy, not an argument. You can look that up too. Pointing out that rights expanded is not proof rights will expand infinitely and badly. That’s just how rights work, they get recognized once people stop being scared of who’s asking. And calling me a nonce because I cited a philosopher correctly says a lot more about your reading comprehension than my argument.

8

Anonymous #9 7w

In the Bible it also says that He is the ONLY God, and we can only get to heaven thru HIM. The Bible very clearly paints us a picture of Christ saying he is the only true God and that believing in Him is correct. You saying that the Bible doesn’t preach correct belief is just wrong, but you are correct about correct practices. We are called to be good people and to strive to be more like Jesus, better people overall.

-1

Anonymous #9 7w

Making it illegal to “misgender” is forcing oneself. Any attempt to make “safeguards” through the government is forcing themselves. They are unnecessary safeguards. Equipping the government with the power to take people’s children for not giving “gender affirming care” is forcing oneself. You guys fatten the government to take on all these unnecessary responsibilities as a way to create a new normal, when it should never have been a government issue in the first place.

-2

Anonymous #15 7w

The bible was written a long ass time AFTER he was murdered. The bible does not represent the divine in verbatim. I said CHRIST did not preach orthodoxy. Do you seriously think christ wrote the bible?

1

Anonymous #15 7w

We’re called to be good people and here you are demonizing the spirits of others. What the hell?

4

Anonymous #9 7w

Who’s putting gender on God? Only people like you who seek to subjugate do that to sneak in your transgender ideology bullshit. No one is really fixated on the matter, except for those who try to manipulate.

-2

Anonymous #15 7w

of course you think I’ve got it all wrong. You’re gonna think that what I’m saying is heresy. Because that’s exactly what the church has labeled its own former traditions as. sound familiar?

1

Anonymous #15 7w

The Bible was not written by Jesus, Homie. The Bible disagrees with itself in so many different ways. It was written about him not by him, and the people who wrote about him, misconstrued him out of worldly institutional corruption.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

you’re the one who’s got transgender ideology the way you’re calling the divine masculine lol if you hate transness so much why is your entire ontology built on it?

6

Anonymous #9 7w

“The Bible disagreed with itself in so many ways” What was? You’re clearly a bad faith slime ball. You people just say shit as if it’s true. Truly, mute yourself.

-3

Anonymous #6 7w

Two creation stories in Genesis 1 and 2 with different order of events (animals before humans in ch1, after in ch2). Two contradictory genealogies of Jesus in Matthew and Luke that don’t match. Judas dies by hanging in Matthew, but by falling and bursting open in Acts. Did Jesus calm the storm and heal a demoniac in Gadara or Gerasa? Depends which gospel you read.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

This isn’t fringe atheist stuff, it’s basic textual criticism taught in seminary. Look up the Documentary Hypothesis if you want the sourcing on Genesis specifically. I’m not being a bad faith slime ball, I’m citing what biblical scholars have documented for over a century. Mute yourself if you can’t handle being fact checked.

5

Anonymous #15 7w

Also… Bringing up a different religion’s founder doesn’t defend what modern Christian institutions do today. That’s a deflection, not a rebuttal.

8

Anonymous #9 7w

You are really bad at pretending you are an intellectual and are failing to apply even your own logic. You presume and don’t even realize where you do, dangerously mind you. It’s amazing that you conclude that you’re properly even applying the Imperative. You have failed the equation entirely. Did you just learn about this or something?

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Cool, so no actual rebuttal to the argument, just vibes and insults lol where’s the flaw in the logic? Show me the maxim I misapplied or the step where treating trans people as means-to-an-end doesn’t hold. If you can’t, this is just you being mad that the Imperative doesn’t back you up.

7

Anonymous #9 7w

You did not cite a philosopher when you first mentioned him, you just said his name and acted like that was good enough (nonce behavior btw) Slippery slope is not limited to being a fallacy you NONCE. However, I mentioned it because when gay marriage was on the ballot, people defended it by saying “of course we won’t push it on kids that’s a slippery slope fallacy” and now here we are, it was not a fallacy, we’re halfway down this slope, and I blame PSEUDS like you.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Still no answer on the actual Kant argument. Three replies now and you haven’t touched the means-to-an-end point once, just called me a slur again. That’s not an argument, that’s you being out of one.

6

Anonymous #6 7w

And gay marriage and trans healthcare are two completely separate legal and medical issues that happened to both involve LGBTQ people. That’s not a slope, that’s just two different things existing in the same decade. You’re doing the thing where you assume “they’re both under the queer umbrella” means “they’re causally connected,” which isn’t how policy works.

3

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #9 7w

1. I don’t have to subscribe to the Kant imperative, that’s something you just brought in which signal to me, you’ve just learned about it. 2. You are presuming where I stand on gender affirming care, and what I believe should be done about gender dysphoria. I’m not going to hold your hand, if you couldn’t piece that together based on what I said previously, then talking further to you is a waste of time because you assume you have the comprehension you clearly do not.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Who is “you guys”? You don’t know who I am

1

Anonymous #6 7w

When did I ever say anything about making it illegal to misgender someone? That is the most insane strawman. It should be blatantly obvious at this point that governance by force doesn’t actually work.

3

Anonymous #9 7w

“You guys” is anyone who things restricting freedoms is “giving freedoms” So yes. You.

-1

Anonymous #9 7w

Oh really? What freedoms are you referring to?

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Uhhh bodily autonomy????? Dignity???

4

Anonymous #6 7w

You don’t even know what I’m talking about.

5

Anonymous #9 7w

If you don’t see the clear connection, then we’ll have to agree to disagree because gender hormone therapy for children stems directly from that initial push of gay marriage.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

So which is it. Two replies ago I ‘failed the equation entirely,’ now you don’t even subscribe to it. You can’t claim I misapplied a framework you also claim doesn’t apply to you, pick one. And I’m not presuming your position, you’re the one who won’t state it. If you actually have a coherent view on gender affirming care, say it plainly instead of hiding behind “figure it out yourself.” That’s not confidence, that’s dodging.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

So vague. Be exact. Heres that thing “you guys”do, you take the clear and obvious issue at hand and mask it behind “human rights” As though it should be a human right to mutilate a body. You guys are such jokes.

0

Anonymous #6 7w

That’s not agreeing to disagree, that’s a factual claim I can check. The Dutch Protocol for youth gender dysphoria treatment started in the 1990s. WPATH standards of care go back to 1979. Both predate Obergefell (2015 marriage ruling) by decades. Trans medical care didn’t “stem from” gay marriage, it developed on a completely separate track in endocrinology and psychology, and existed before marriage equality was even law.

2

Anonymous #6 7w

You’re treating “happened after” as “caused by,” which is a basic causal fallacy (post hoc ergo propter hoc, if you want the Latin for your collection). Two things sharing a decade and an acronym isn’t a causal chain.

4

Anonymous #9 7w

You are so inept I just can’t. For your sake I’ll assume you’re pretending to be dumb, because it’s not worth further effort. I’ll just give you insults from here on out. Just a heads up if you want to continue.

0

Anonymous #9 7w

Just give me the invite to your ChatGPT session bro, skip the copy/paste.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

“mutilation” is a loaded word that YOU are imposing on the situation. THE RIGHT TO GOVERN YOUR OWN BODY IS AN INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED HUMAN RIGHT, DOUCHE BAG.

3

Anonymous #9 7w

People can do what they want to themselves, sure. I don’t believe self harm should be government sanctioned, influenced, or funded however

0

Anonymous #6 7w

*claude

6

Well we’re looking at it from our position now. Gay Marriage repeal is not even a consideration. We have a whole generation now that’s grown up with it being the norm. However, I was going into the effect of it and how we are in our current climate today. Many do not know how things were before it was legalized. I do. I will not let history be rewritten or manipulated.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

YOU see it as self-harm. That is YOUR imposition. Not their experience. Trans people experience it as the exact opposite. You are enforcing metaphysics as fact and treating resistance as oppression. That’s wrong. You have it completely backwards.

5

Anonymous #9 7w

No shit, genital mutilation and transition operations have existed from the beginning of time. I’m talking about American law, however. Follow. The. Bouncing. Ball.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

FUCK American law. It’s fundamentally corrupt and you’re not getting it.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

It is self harm. Operations are not the way to treat it. In part, it is a physiological disorder (in some aspects) But if people of sound and mature aged minds want to mutilate what is a perfectly fine body to become a permanent ward of the medical industry complex, more power to them. I don’t want my taxes to fund that shit tho.

0

Anonymous #6 7w

You think all the corruption is in the past NO it is baked into our foundation. It is responsible for our own homegrown humanitarian crises TODAY.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

Have you not read the 13th amendment? Do you not know about the exception clause? Do you not know about the resulting black codes and vagrancy laws were being unemployed and black was criminalized?

5

Anonymous #6 7w

this country has been committing ontological violence since it’s beginning, and it has not stopped. wake up and smell the fucking roses.

6

Anonymous #9 7w

See you’re all over the place. Talking to you is like talking to the bum at a gas station who’s high on uppers. It’s really not this complicated. This conversation thread is about American Politics. You can’t just say fuck American Law and get upset I won’t deviate from the premise.

0

Anonymous #6 7w

It’s not self harm, it’s healthcare that trans people report drastically improves their wellbeing and reduces suicidality. that’s actual outcome data. Also if non-consensual body modification is your actual line, where’s your outrage about infant circumcision? That’s permanent, done without consent, on literal infants, and plenty of it is funded by insurance and Medicaid, your tax dollars. You’ve never once brought that up. Curious.

3

Anonymous #9 7w

There you go presuming again. Corruption? Homegrown humanitarian crises? You realize I’m not in your head right? I have no idea what you’re taking about, and you failed to lay out your argument.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Great rebuttal. Hits all the points.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

There you go goal posting, how boring. You already know the answer, you’re just trying to derail? Are you trying to call out hypocrisy? Even if I passed this hypocrisy test, would you just bring up another one? And then another, Ad infinitum? I see your point. And you are wrong. I’ve heard the same argument you’ve laid out. And they are wrong. The future will look on people like you like how we look on those who gave lobotomies in the past. You are actively endorsing human right violations.

0

Anonymous #6 7w

Yes, corruption. We have, simultaneously, the highest incarceration rate AND recidivism rate. The exception clause of the 13th amendment left open a loophole where slavery is legal as a punishment for “crime” which directly incentivized legislation that criminalized being black and unemployed. The industrial prison complex is responsible for over $10 million in yearly economic output while stripping workers of basic labor protections like minimum wage which we already know is obscenely low

4

Anonymous #9 7w

THE HIGHEST INCARCERATION AND RECIDIVISM RATES IN THE WORLD BTW. Higher than Russia AND China.

2

Anonymous #6 7w

Just because you are incapable of understanding doesn’t make me inept lmao what a convenient cop out.

6

Comment Deleted

0

Thank you, is scary how confident he was. I hope he doesn’t end up in some position of influence. Not even because I disagree, but because he’s a loony.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

You think that’s goalposting? I’m pointing out the material incongruence of your ideology. Giving people the right to govern their own body is NOT even remotely close to a human rights violation. It’s the exact opposite. Have you ever actually had an open minded conversation with a queer person about their gender?

6

When you’re deeply biased, anything with outside of your paradigm seems crazy.

3

Anonymous #6 7w

Shut the hell up. You are the one who needs myths to hold up your position.

2

Anonymous #6 7w

you guys being a shining example of partisanship lol:

5

Anonymous #15 7w

You say “the fed gov shouldn’t have that much control on our lives” in support of the federal government getting rid of something that protected a super important choice in our lives. That doesn’t make sense to me. I understand the need for not all decisions to be made on a federal level but I don’t think it’s crazy to say the fed gov actively going out of its way to make US/state citizens more vulnerable is a bad thing. The ppl who suffer the most are poor ppl who can’t leave the state easily

2

Anonymous #6 7w

That’s called nationalism diva we are all living on a floating rock in space breathing a volatile atmosphere into perfect equilibrium of a global symbiosis and you are concerned about borders and citizenship. IT’S ALL COLONIZER BULLSHIT

7

Anonymous #9 7w

You’re a crazy reductionist. Nothing matters! There’s no rules! Fuck off freak. People like you are a cancer that’s only festered off the hard work of others. Pathetic human you are.

9

Anonymous #9 7w

Ah there it is, the next test, as I called it. You are predictable by this point, and not very intellectually challenging. My intuition was right about you. You are very lame.

-1

Anonymous OP 7w

This may be the most intelligent thing anyone in this thread has said. Lmao. You’re right tho

4

Anonymous #9 7w

Myths… according to you, nothings matters! Floating rock! Clump of cells! You’re a degenerate reductionist. You don’t care about bettering or progressing society, because you have no basis in reality itself. My dog is more valuable than you.

-1

Anonymous #6 7w

Oh, I replied to the wrong person. I was talking about you.

1

Anonymous #27 7w

lol

0

Anonymous #6 7w

I agree deeply with just about everything #9 is saying. DJT is a terrorist, and if you look at him and see a godly man, you are not a Christian. He does not love God with all his heart and he does not love his neighbor as himself. He’s probably the Antichrist.

6

Anonymous #27 7w

He said nothing about Trump In this tread.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

I’m not talking about him. I was calling you crazy. When you find that God hates all the people you do, that us how you know that you have created an idol. Reflect, and repent your evil. You are too attached to the things of this world - arbitrary things like borders and gender constructs. God can and does transcend both as He pleases. You cannot limit Him, for to do so would be impious.

6

Anonymous #6 7w

You’re the one who made it reductionist. I see beauty in our being.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

We create reality collectively with our behavior. We are not just created by it. It’s a relationship. You are fostering an unhealthy one. We need not be separated because we are not actually separated. We are all the universe looking at itself from different perspectives. We are one but only when we recognize ourselves and each other as such.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

This you? Reductionist Dumbass.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

To hate another is to hate yourself, to love another is to remember who you are. Are you not capable of loving people who are different than you?

1

Anonymous #27 7w

You make no sense. You actually sound crazy. Satanic even. Should we just stop living our lives. Stop doing anything? Just let Islam take over, maybe? Really dude. Ur a joke.

-1

Anonymous #9 7w

How do you define love? You’re full of shit.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

Trust in God, not in your own understanding. I hope you come to see the truth eventually.

2

Anonymous #6 7w

Love is undefinable. It’s ineffable. The experience of love cannot truly represented with language. It’s something that is known, embodied, and felt. It can be expressed in many ways but never truly defined. It’s irrational, much like the divine.

1

Anonymous #27 7w

Sounds like you are using the gospel to push your own agenda, just like you accuse”Trump” of, and that very action is the basis of your criticism. So therefore, you’re a hypocrite. Messing with children is demonic. Thinking yourself Christ like, by not defending your own country and religion, is not wisdom.

0

Anonymous #6 7w

It’s something you know. It’s built in. It’s something of metacognition. And it’s also something you DO. Not just feel. That’s what i mean when i say embody.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

Well you defeat your own premise, you say I can’t love myself, yet you can’t define that love. You are a crazy person, lmfao. Love is in deed and in truth. Read the Bible you pretend you have.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

What you say has no foundation in scripture, what you have to say about it the divine and morality is meaningless when it comes to scripture, again you are a reductionist. You have no core beliefs structure. Just say you think; “love is what makes you feel good”, because it’s clearly the case.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

This is not only a reflection of me. It’s an encounter between us. You are also responsible for how you feel.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

You’re so lost, you just have realized it yet. You’re a part of the “new age” frame of mind. I’ve explored that, and it takes you no where good. It is demonic. There are demons puppeteering you, you don’t even realize.

0

Anonymous #9 7w

lol sure buddy, get more vague and philosophical as you fail to contend.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

You repeatedly typed me as the kind of person I would likely disagree with in multiple significant ways and then got upset when I called you on your bullshit. That’s on you.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

You encountered me and flinched. I encountered you and pried.

1

Anonymous #9 7w

Upset? lol what kind of person do you think you are? You’re not very coherent

1

Anonymous #9 7w

Lmao you’re actually hilarious.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

I’m glad you’re amused.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

You can’t turn my argument around on me. There is a modern renaissance happening and you are on the WRONG side of history. The unconscious side. That’s what satan really is. Not a being but the lack of consciousness in the creation of your reality. A way of being that reacts and makes messes unintentionally. I see you as lost in unconsciousness. I pray you wake up soon and find christ.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

The bible is not written by jesus it was written by his murderers I’m so sorry. I know that’s hard to grapple with but that’s just how it is. You have to take it with a grain of salt and do your own investigation of history to really figure it out.

0

Comment Deleted

0

false, most of the scriptures we know who wrote them and the Old Testament was written before Jesus not the whole Bible.

2

His teachings were passed down orally for almost a century before they appeared in writing, and those earliest texts do NOT agree with each other. That is the historical record, unfortunately.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

That’s not what I said at all. That’s yet another strawman you’ve fabricated. Why do you do that so much? It is because you feel like you lack control in your life? You can’t claim to be a righteous person while being blatantly derogatory and hateful.

-2

Anonymous #9 7w

Holy projection Batman. I’m pretty content with my life, you’re the one acting like the sky is falling chicken little, and like Trump is literal Hitler. And you are a reductionist pseud. Complaining about a country you live in and benefit from. It must be nice to use your lack of accomplishments and inexperienced life as a sword to attack the hard work of others. Call them “colonizers” or whatever, you could never accomplish anything similar in your life or contribute to anything to society.

4

Anonymous #6 7w

Nationalism is NOT christ-like 🤣

0

Anonymous #9 7w

It’s well established that you are not Christian, so anything you have to say regarding that is moot

1

Comment Deleted

0

Basically every campus is liberal tbh

8

Anonymous last_republican_on_yikyak 7w

“more morally righteous” but yall lit hate anything that isn’t rich white christian men😭

1

Anonymous #6 7w

I don’t even know what this means

4

Anonymous #13 7w

Honestly idk I think this comment replied to the wrong one, plus a typo as well

1

Anonymous #6 7w

I meant ur comment lmao

6

Anonymous #13 7w

Yeah that what I was referring to, I think my prior comment was meant to reply to another.

1

Anonymous #6 7w

Oh lol

1

Anonymous #9 6w

Most non-sequitur run on sentence I’ve ever read. Uhh what?

1

Anonymous #1 6w

Ur probably too young to understand but one day you’ll thank him for making sure Iran doesn’t develop a nuke and take out the West.

1