Anonymous #1 5w

plenty of the victims have spoken out, and they have been practically ignored ;(

177

Anonymous #3 5w

The Epstein files are getting released.

75

Anonymous #4 5w

Ohh, thank you.

6

Anonymous #7 5w

where did you hear this

4

Anonymous #8 5w

From the video of her recording it that is all over the internet? I mean he’s full on verbally admitting everything we thought.

7

Anonymous #7 5w

Link

1

Anonymous #9 5w

You can use some research skills to find it yourself I’m not posting a link in the comments on here bruh

-3

Anonymous #7 5w

No baby, you made the claim, you have to back it up. That’s how this works. You must provide your sources

20

Anonymous #2 5w

And releasing documents containing information about their abuse without protecting it would somehow be better? Not all redactions will be protective of abusers. Some will, ofc, Pam bondi is in charge of what’s redacted, but a lot will genuinely be to protect victims

6

Anonymous #1 5w

Ok? Shit’s gonna be organized. They can leave the little header “victims names+addresses” and redact that part while still publishing the names, addresses, and other personal information of every despicable rapist on that list.

1

Anonymous #10 5w

In case it’s not obvious, I’m implying that there are people out there who would willingly go kill these people, which is a justifiable consequence for fucking with kids.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

Here’s a couple links: https://x.com/jamesokeefeiii/status/1963617871281438731?s=46 https://youtu.be/tx5F6llyaVw?si=HMiqgGMrb3NAK37b

1

Anonymous #10 5w

Well, yes. I’m just saying don’t assume every redaction is a name of an affiliate and protecting a predator, a lot of redactions will be directly relating to victims too

1

Anonymous #10 5w

1. Thank you! Was that really so hard? 2. First link doesn’t work 3. Second link gives conflicting information than your comment. It’s the DOJ, not cia, the video was from a company known for gotcha “journalism” (hence the fake date), and he did not confirm Republican names would be redacted, he speculated those in charge of the redactions would most likely redact only those who are Republican/conservative. He’s probably right, but he’s in no position to know he’s right/has no power over it.

1

Anonymous #1 5w

I literally said my source… are you guys illiterate? I watched the video. I don’t have the fucking link to the video sorry. It exists and is on the internet and is not difficult to find. You’re the one worried about seeing it YOU go find it. Dont call me baby when you need to be baby fed information. Jesus man you guys are stupid

1

Anonymous #1 5w

You weren’t even in the conversation. You stepped in and were so wrong.

0

Anonymous #7 5w

I wasn’t wrong I simply agreed with others you needed sources. And 2 days later when you provided them they showed you misspoke and one didn’t even work. I also did not call you baby but go off

0