Anonymous #1 5w

🤷🏽‍♂️

28

Anonymous #3 4w

Nah, I think it’s gotta be a white man that has to do it. Anyone else would possibly just end up disenfranchising their community even more.

47

Anonymous #3 4w

this is the only point, if someone goes for it, it will only strengthen the goons in the cult following to continue what he started

21

Anonymous #6 4w

Exactly. It has to be a white man.

13

Anonymous OP 4w

you saw what happened when a white man shot Kirk, they believe what they want to believe

6

Anonymous #9 4w

The difference is that if somebody who’s not a white man does it, it could potentially have a bigger impact on community that are already disenfranchised.

11

Anonymous #8 4w

he absolutely deserves to die a slow and painful death but it’s more about sending a message

38

Anonymous OP 4w

Not only that, he’d have to be a cishet Christian conservative white man. Otherwise the maga cult has too much room to point fingers at queer people, especially trans people and allies. Regardless, it’d still martyr him so I personally am counting on another stroke or two

17

Anonymous OP 4w

it was a white man for Kirk and it further disenfranchised the trans community since they headcanoned that he was dating his trans landlord. point is that no matter who it is they’ll dig into their past until they find a scapegoat. not that it shouldn’t happen, just that someone he hates will be punished regardless.

13

Anonymous #8 4w

rather see him live long enough to be made an example of than die in office and be turned into a martyr for the american dumbfuck community

21

Anonymous #9 4w

I understand that, but it will be far worse if somebody does it who is a part of a disenfranchise community already.

6

Anonymous #11 4w

Gotta go the way of a roman emperor (slowly becoming more and more inhumane and abhorrent until someone does It)

1

Anonymous #11 4w

Look up Caligula for an idea of what i mean

1

Anonymous OP 4w

THIS is how y’all choose to waste your time?

1

Anonymous #14 4w

Thank you. Also not a Trump supporter, but this is exactly the mentality that allows people like him to get into office

-4

Anonymous #15 4w

Half the world thinks it’s a good thing that he got into office. Your mentality is exactly what allows innocent political figures like Charlie Kirk to be murdered.

-3

Anonymous #14 4w

I mean that not at you but the original poster lol

-3

Anonymous #14 4w

He’s committed war crimes, he’s been connected with Epstein, his wars and conflicts have caused the prices of things to go up for the average American, the government shut down along with the reduction of SNAP benefits made it so that my girlfriend’s family and her six younger siblings struggled with finding food, he’s racist, he threatened genocide on Iran, shall I keep going? I’m not liberal, nor am I conservative, but he’s done nothing to help my individual group of people either.

8

Anonymous #14 4w

“Half the world thinks it’s a good thing he got into office”

8

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m Native American. This administration has done nothing to help MMIW and disproportionate human trafficking crimes on Native Americans, he’s doing more for Israel than he is for his own country. Popping him would be less equivalent than a mere fraction of the people he’s indirectly killed through war, policy, or being associated with people who do horrendous things.

15

Anonymous #14 4w

“innocent” he was a demagogue and I’m plenty glad he and his brand of violence is gone. sucks he was murdered but at least he can’t hurt more people.

2

Anonymous #14 4w

I actually don’t agree with Charlie Kirk being murdered. I don’t think he had good morals, nor do I agree with anything that he said, but there’s a difference in the influence that Charlie Kirk had versus the influence and power that the president of the United States has. I don’t think he should’ve been murdered, but if our president had an “accident” and was no longer alive, I don’t think that would be a bad thing and I would be happy.

1

Anonymous #14 4w

Yeah I mean this “half the world” take is just not true. Only 28% of eligible voters voted for Trump. It’d be more accurate to say 25% of the world thinks it’s a good thing, 25% is upset, and the remaining 50% is either indifferent, uneducated, or too busy to weigh in.

1

Anonymous #15 4w

You can cry me a river if you’d like.

4

Anonymous OP 4w

Being happy for someone’s death because you disagree with them is just wrong. Full stop. Objectively. Lol you’re supposed to be the party of joy? Of compassion and empathy? This is at the core of what debased the DNC in the last decade.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Would I be happy IF (if) he was convicted of crimes and sent to jail? Yep. But social change through death is just something our country is above. You have to consider that although you may have all the confidence in the world he’s a terrible person, it validating to someone across the isle who’s been radicalized in the opposite direction.

-3

Anonymous #15 4w

What party of joy? I don’t align with either party so you’re just assuming things now. And while I can agree that there are some objective wrongs, being happy if somebody like our current president was exterminated is not one of them. Do you think it would be wrong for people to have a celebrated Hitlers death? I’m not saying Trump is Hitler, but he’s done some pretty egregious things that make it to the point where I would be celebrating if he died.

7

Anonymous #15 4w

“because you disagree with them” vs enacting actual harm through policies and rhetoric that deprive people of necessary care… if you go around campaigning for hate and ignorance and CONVINCE PEOPLE then you are being more harmful than a murderer.

7

No, stats aren’t that simple lol. First of all, it says at the top of that same pew article “34% have some or a lot of confidence in Trump”. Secondly, it states people who didn’t know who he was or were indifferent were not counted. So that dampens both sides. Gauging world sentiment is not an exact science, I’d love to know how this data was collected. But I’m still comfortable with the 25/50/25 approximation. #stopweaponizingstatistics

-1

Anonymous #15 4w

“#stopweaponizingstatistics” while actively pulling a number out your ass 💀 ok bro, this conversation is over after blatant hypocrisy

9

Anonymous OP 4w

Did you vote for Harris in 2024? And yeah, people didn’t largely celebrate Hitlers death. Headlines or pundits didn’t glorify his suicide. Firstly it was unconfirmed if he was actually dead for several weeks. VE celebrations were about Nazi Germany’s surrender as a country and the Allies advance through Berlin, which happened simultaneously. I would have rather seen Hitler brought to trial and sentenced. Every president in history has done egregious shit. Try to give one exception.

-1

Anonymous #15 4w

I did not vote for Harris in 2024 because I was 16 years old. And I’m not asking whether or not people celebrated Hitler’s death, I was asking you if you thought it would be wrong to celebrate his death. You said it would be wrong, which I don’t think the large majority of people would agree with. I think that some people deserve death as opposed to being sentenced, and I believe somebody that has committed sexual assault, threatened genocide, and was that close with Epstein deserves death.

5

Anonymous #15 4w

As for if I can name any “good” presidents, I’m not even sure if I can think of any “good” politicians in general, but there are certainly some people that are worse than others. Kamala Harris would have been better and is a better human being than Donald Trump so I would’ve voted for her if I was eligible, but as a Native American whose ancestors were killed by people with similar beliefs to current politicians, I don’t “support” any politician.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

My people lived in a matriarchal society, were not Christian, were not bound to the constraints of capitalism, and were not “illegal” to any land. My people are indigenous to New Mexico, which used to be a part of Mexico. Now, New Mexico is a U.S. state because the border moved to encompass our land. Do I share some values that align with liberalism in the United States? Yes I do, but i’m not a liberal. No president has ever done anything to benefit the Native American community.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

We still have MMIW, we still have a disproportionate number of people in our community being trafficked, we still have all these problems that no president has ever helped. I don’t think Kamala Harris would’ve helped anything, but Donald Trump sure made things worse. 90% of all Mexicans have some indigenous DNA. The average Mexican has 40-66%. Because of statistics like these, Native Americans from nations/tribes that are within United States jurisdiction are being profiled and detained.

5

Anonymous OP 4w

This wouldn’t have happened to the same extent under Kamala Harris, but now that ICE is allowed to racially profile under Donald Trump, my community is being harmed.

5

Anonymous OP 4w

Wow, lot of explanation from you. 1) It’s not useful to celebrate anyone’s death, ever. It’s really that simple. 2) You say you’d have voted for her (which is how you show alignment and support in European systems of gov) “the party of joy” was her campaign. 3) You speak like a racial supremacist. 90% of indig deaths were due to disease. “Your people” have the opportunity to enjoy modern America as much as anyone else. They took land from others, as had land taken from them. Dont feel special.

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

And yeah, under Harris border patrol law wouldn’t have been adequately enforced to prevent illegal crossings (which most adversely affect black, latino, and low income border-adjacent communities anyway). It’s probably the most glaring reason why DT was able to be elected.

-2

Anonymous #15 4w

I’m not a racial supremacist, it’s just that no president has done anything that had helped native americans more than it hurt them. There is nothing wrong with celebrating the death of a person who sexually assaulted someone and talks about genocide so lightly. Native americans have disproportionately high rates of being murdered, raped, and trafficed which is a systemic issue.

10

Anonymous #15 4w

As for Natives being wiped out mostly by disease and taking land from each other, my people are the Taos Pueblo of New Mexico and the only major conflict we had was the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 in which all the pueblos in the area worked TOGETHER to kick out the spanish for 10 years because the Spanish actively destroyed our artifacts and culture, raped the women and children, and persecuted us for not being catholic.

5

Anonymous OP 4w

That’s a fucking issue, and I would be happy to see the conquistadors die at the hands of my people. If I saw it, I would celebrate it. It wasn’t just a physical genocide, it was an erasure of culture, language, history, and there wouldn’t be much that would make me happier than seeing those conquistadors perish, but since I can’t go back in time, I’d be happy with seeing our disgusting excuse of a president be taken out.

10