Ew, you’re grubby.

25

Porn is blocked for under 18 kids.. but all the kids walking around Times Square get it for free…

44

Anonymous #7 8w

Nude exploitation isn’t a sport…..

14

Is that why whales have gay sex? To reproduce?

7

Anonymous #7 8w

Normally, I’m on your side because nudity is NOT inherently sexual because that notion is the product of culture and social conditioning, HOWEVER as a portrait photographer who has shot nudes, the posing in this image is very suggestive even if she was clothed.

16

Anonymous #10 8w

It’s also important to think about the target audience and the actions/speech/perceptions of the person being photographed. Those both make it clear that #7 is being intentionally dishonest

1

Anonymous #10 8w

I’m more speaking on how it affects the sexual orientation aspect mentioned in the caption of the post. A solo model doesn’t inherently make it gay or straight. That’s all I’m saying. Also I’d like to point out I am not anti LGBTQ+… this is coming from a place of love.

-1

Anonymous #11 8w

“Intentionally dishonest” ???

0

Anonymous #7 8w

The post is not talking about sexual orientation smh you took that wayyyy too literally. It’s more of a commentary about hypocrisy among people who claim to care about shielding children from adult material but actually just use that rhetoric as a costume to cover up feelings of prejudice towards queer people. Queer people are the most nonexistent threat to children meanwhile pastors are statistically more likely to sexually abuse children.

1

Anonymous #7 8w

And people who are anti-queer often support organized monotheistic religion while simultaneously claiming to care about children. It’s poking at the cognitive dissonance.

1