Insane Comments on Sidechat | The fact that “both parties need to agree” for a recording to be admissible in court is the most absurd horse shit anyone has ever come up with. “Excuse me sir, Mr manager who’s threatening my life savings and committing bf a crime, may I record us?”

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Insane Comments 10w

The fact that “both parties need to agree” for a recording to be admissible in court is the most absurd horse shit anyone has ever come up with. “Excuse me sir, Mr manager who’s threatening my life savings and committing bf a crime, may I record us?”

21 upvotes, 2 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in Insane Comments. "The fact that “both parties need to agree” for a recording to be admissible in court is the most absurd horse shit anyone has ever come up with.

“Excuse me sir, Mr manager who’s threatening my life savings and committing bf a crime, may I record us?”"

Anonymous 10w

nah the move is to tell them you’re recording it and that they can end the call if they have a problem with that

Anonymous

#1 10w

That’s not the move at all you just get fired lol. The US is overwhelmingly right to work with no unions, we have close to zero rights. The correct move is to get everything in writing. Follow up every meeting with an email re-capping the meeting and asking for confirmation. If they don’t acknowledge it then don’t execute, you covered yourself. If they acknowledge you have a paper trail. It’s good hygiene anyway, many bosses thrive on the ambiguity of verbal meetings.