Anonymous #2 4w

According to Google he’s worth approx. 200-300 million and owns at least 3 luxury properties…

16

Anonymous OP 4w

Net work isn’t cash value, do remember he just sold off his discography to pay off debts so that’s where the supposedly value comes from. Also why do you think he was using youtube, he no longer gets royalties from singing his songs; might as well play old videos.

6

Anonymous #2 4w

My guy he still has multiple properties

5

Anonymous #1 4w

Okay and, people can have multiple properties and be broke, Martha Stewart was broke still had properties, Mc Hammer also broke had properties.

0

Anonymous #1 4w

And according to google that’s also after the sale

1

Anonymous #1 4w

So like I said that’s his net worth after the sale not before okay great glad we cleared up what I already said.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

Ok so then why can’t a multi millionaire pay for a better shoe

0

Anonymous #2 4w

He has more than enough money to at least put on some sort of performance - he was literally just sitting there on his computer for part of it. If a female pop star did that, they’d get attacked left and right but male singers get away with putting on mediocre performances

8

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m not saying he shouldn’t have done a better performance, he really should’ve, it was mediocre and I couldn’t imagine paying for that. Yes if Lady Gaga, Ariana Grande, Beyoncé (especially her), Sabrina Carpenter that same evening but on such a piss poor excuse of a set they’d be crucified. I’m not excusing him, I’m just saying he literally couldn’t have afforded it. That he’s broke well like Martha Stewart broke. Quite frankly if it was going to be that bad he should’ve cancelled tbh.

0

Anonymous #2 4w

“I’m not excusing it” proceeds to excuse it

1

Anonymous #2 4w

I mean he literally has the money from selling his catalog

3

Anonymous #1 4w

Followed by if it was going to be that bad should’ve been cancelled but you ignored that part right because why continue reading.

3