Anonymous #1 8w

Yep, this is why I quoted the post because human rights are nonnegotiable for me sorry.

47

Anonymous OP 8w

Do we not have human rights? Lol

-12

Anonymous #1 8w

Nah dawg! We can disagree on sports team! On pizza toppings! NOT ON HUMAN RIGHTS!!! We can’t disagree on whether a person deserves to be unalived or gunned down by secret police over being born in the “wrong longitude”. Not to mention the LITERAL CONCENTRATION CAMPS!

30

Anonymous #1 8w

Evidently not if you’re a migrant, legal or otherwise.

36

Anonymous #2 8w

First of all, they’re not concentration camps. They’re not being unalived in the detention centers, get your facts straight. Next, if you’re here ILLEGALLY, you deserve to be taken away. I get that many of them want a better life, but do it the right way. Common sense big dawg.

-12

Anonymous #2 8w

Completely false. No idea where you get your information but I’m gonna assume you’ve been brainwashed by the media. If you’re a legal citizen, you have all your rights based upon the constitution. If you’re illegal, you still have rights but are limited. It’s common sense

-15

Anonymous #1 8w

I knew from that first comment u were a conservative lmao

37

Anonymous #1 8w

Your “common sense” defies international humanitarian law

13

Anonymous #1 8w

Perhaps if u were more involved in politics you would know this

13

Anonymous #1 8w

Hey babes, so ICE has detained legal citizens without due process. That is against the constitution and is a dismissal of human rights! The SAVE Act is also effectively chipping away at voting rights for women, trans people, and anyone who happens to change their legal name.

14

Anonymous #1 8w

Genuinely just google pictures of the conditions of those detention centers. You might change your tune.

12

Anonymous #2 8w

Great example would be the right to life of unborn children that are violated during abortions

-6

Anonymous #4 8w

Having 1 in 100 million citizens get erroneously detained by ICE (for a short time before being released) is undoubtedly worth the trade off of mass deporting the millions of illegal parasites that have flooded this country

-6

Anonymous #5 8w

Actually the United States’ legal system doesn’t recognize the rights of the unborn. For example, the birth certificate is done after birth, child support isn’t paid to expecting mothers even though the child is an expense during pregnancy

7

Anonymous #3 8w

Oh I’m aware, it’s an absolute atrocity

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

You become a citizen when you are born on this land, not conceived, etc

4

Anonymous #3 8w

That legal loophole allows the unalienable rights of unborn children to be violated. It’s absolutely abhorrent.

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

It’s not a loophole, it’s a legal doctrine that has been accepted for the entirety of our nations history

8

Anonymous #5 8w

You don’t like it, find a different a country to live in that handles it differently

3

Anonymous #3 8w

That is the “loophole” that allows abortion in this country. If unborn children were granted those rights abortion wouldn’t be legal

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

The constitution is not a loophole dumbass

5

Anonymous #5 8w

If the founders intended the unborn to have rights, I promise you they would have. Abortion existed back then

5

Anonymous #3 8w

No, I don’t have to move countries to oppose abortion, what a terrible take. You would have been the person telling abolitionists to just move somewhere else if they didn’t support slavery in pre civil war era. Braindead take

-3

Anonymous #3 8w

The founding fathers intentionally left that up to the states. It wasn’t intended to be a federal issue it was to be decided on a state by state basis

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

The actually braindead take is comparing an inconscious clump of cells to sentient beings who were cruelly tortured and exploited for economic gain, who lived lives of indescribable horror

7

Anonymous #5 8w

No, the founders spent no time on the issue of abortion. But they set up a polity wherein you are legally recognized as existent after birth

7

Anonymous #3 8w

No it’s actually not it’s actually a great comparison cope harder though. Abortion needs to be abolished just like slavery and it’s going to take people like me standing up for those without a voice to achieve that

-3

Anonymous #3 8w

Yeah, they spent no time on the issue of abortion because they left it up to the states…as I already told you

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

Talking out of your ass abt well documented historical events Im dead

10

Anonymous #3 8w

What event are you talking about I didn’t mention any specific event?☠️☠️ You’re just pulling shit out of thin air? What is your argument? You’re clearly a biased, indoctrinated and ignorant child

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

No, the issues they left to the states they took time discussing and considering. There was no mention of abortion at all. But the way the fed and then state governments were set up, it was a way in which recognition begins at birth. You cannot disagree with that, it is factually accurate

8

Anonymous #5 8w

It’s not “those” it’s “what” because it’s a clump of cells, not a being

4

Anonymous #3 8w

*that

3

Anonymous #5 8w

The founding

3

Anonymous #5 8w

I am educated in American History, specifically the constitutional kind but keep telling me I’m ignorant lol

3

Anonymous #3 8w

That’s just blatantly untrue. They did not “discuss and consider” every single issue they left to the states. That was the whole point of leaving things to the states, because it would be impossible to “discuss and consider” every possible topic/issue under the sun. You are a moron. This is what Google says: “The framers left domestic criminal laws and health regulations to individual states rather than creating a federal standard” That means abortion just fell under that umbrella.

-4

Anonymous #3 8w

You are just a clump of cells m0r0n😂😂. If you’re just a clump of cells I should be able to abort you at 20 years old by that logic

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

Ah but I’m conscious, and have and consciousness before, so by my logic, no you can’t

8

Anonymous #3 8w

*had

3

Anonymous #3 8w

News flash buddy, human fetuses are conscious too😂😂

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

Inconscience is the state of not and having never been capable of mental activity/conciousness

8

Anonymous #5 8w

Not at the point at which most abortions occur actually

6

Anonymous #5 8w

They gain consciousness far later in fetal development

7

Anonymous #3 8w

The age they gain consciousness is highly debated to this day and science doesn’t even understand what consciousness is at all yet so that’s a terrible and vague argument to make

-3

Anonymous #3 8w

What about vegetable people who don’t have any brain activity? They are just a clump of cells and technically unconscious. Does that mean they should be aborted?

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

It’s debated whether it occurs at 24 or 26 weeks. Not quite vague and highly debated. Nice try tho!

7

Anonymous #5 8w

Most (more than 93%) abortions occur within the first 13 weeks

8

Anonymous #5 8w

I already explained, they have had consciousness previously

6

Anonymous #3 8w

Having consciousness previously is not a condition for being conscious vs unconscious, you literally made that up lmfao. Someone who is conscious can lose consciousness and become unconscious

-4

Anonymous #5 8w

You are incorrectly conflating unconsciousness and inconsciousness. The former is the state of not having consciousness. The latter, a philosophical concept that describes the former with the addition of having never previously been conscious

6

Anonymous #3 8w

And the debate about fetal concourses is not simply whether it occurs at 24 or 36 weeks at all! There is a lot of evidence that suggests conscioussness is tethered to the human body at the moment of conception. You clearly haven’t heard of the zinc spark and what quantum biology is uncovering about the moment of conception. That is when consciousness is tied to the body

-3

Anonymous #5 8w

I’ve only explained it like 4 times

4

Anonymous #5 8w

You literally can’t ready I said 36. And no, there is not a lot of evidence that suggests that. I’m aware of the zinc spark and all of that, but that doesn’t change the classic definition of consciousness our society has been using for centuries

3

Anonymous #5 8w

The scientists who focus on fetal development say 24-26 weeks is the stage where that develops

4

Anonymous #5 8w

I was being sarcastic when I called it a debate, because it’s actually a range cuz not everyone develops the same. You clearly don’t know what ur talking abt

4

Anonymous #3 8w

Inconscious is hardly a real word if it even is at all and even if it is, it has the identical meaning of unconscious. Can’t find inconscious in any dictionaries, but Google does say “inconscious" is a real word, but it is archaic (old-fashioned) and rarely used in modern English. Definition: It means the same thing as unconscious—not awake, not aware, or done without intention. 😭😭🫵🤡

-4

Anonymous #3 8w

And what is this classic definition of consciousness that our society has been using for decades? Even when society doesn’t understand the nature of consciousness and can’t agree on what it is? I’m wondering what definition youre basing your view from

-1

Anonymous #3 8w

If you’re aware of the zinc spark you should be aware that that is the moment consciousness is tethered to human body. So you know you’re wrong and you’re just arguing to argue atp?😂😂

-1

Anonymous #3 8w

“when the sperm and egg merge, the Higgs fields of their subatomic particles entangle, creating microscopic black holes (EPR) that connect the code or qubits (light) which make up consciousness to the zygote.”

-3

Anonymous #3 8w

“We propose that the quantum entanglement of the subatomic particles triggers the waves of calcium to be released inside the cell at 250 mph. This then results in a synchronous expulsion of 20 billion zinc atoms waiting at the periphery of the cell, which act as the nanoantenna to tie or entangle (EPR) the qubits or code that is the consciousness, each unique to the individual, connecting it to the combination of DNA from each parent.”

-3

Anonymous #3 8w

The newest science on this (quantum biology) suggests you are dead wrong on the stage consciousness develops. But I thought the science was settled and the debate is that it’s somewhere between 24-36 weeks?😂🫵🤡

-3

Anonymous #4 8w

Genuinely, still not a concentration camp. Conditions may be harsh, like prisons

-5

Anonymous #3 8w

You’re just mad that I’m right and you’re wrong

-4

Anonymous #3 8w

Such a dumb thing to say

-5

Anonymous #5 8w

Yes pls explain how my explanation of a concept in the discipline I am formally educated in and u are not is incorrect, you and and google are obviously the only ppl who would know

4

Anonymous #5 8w

Its and explanation that is like a book in length can be summed up as “one thinks therefore one is”

3

Anonymous #5 8w

The zinc spark is what stops more than one sperm from entering the egg. You are a deranged illiterate lunatic

4

Anonymous #3 8w

Cope with the facts I just sent you. You clearly don’t read the literature on this

-3

Anonymous #6 8w

Ayo shutcho fukin bitch4$$ up neegy

-15

Anonymous #5 8w

got me good?

7

Anonymous #6 8w

You really think unborn children don’t have rights just because they haven’t been born yet?😂🫵🤡

-15

Anonymous #5 8w

no i just love abortion

10

Anonymous #6 8w

Demonic activity for sure

-13

Anonymous #5 8w

😈😈

14

Anonymous #6 8w

Cornball behavior but also🤮🤮

-14

Anonymous #5 8w

mad bc ur ugly

10

Anonymous #6 8w

I’m a 6’8” chadlite no cap n gown seethe and mald tho

-11

Anonymous #5 8w

ew ur a man?

3

Anonymous #6 8w

Yes what does that have to do with being an abolitionist?

-11

Anonymous #5 8w

this is a woman’s issue. u can’t even get pregnant so stfu

7

Anonymous #6 8w

You’re the type of person that would have told people who were opposing slavery to just not own slaves🤡

-9

Anonymous #5 8w

bro what. r u actually okay.

10

Anonymous #6 8w

Nah do some reflection on that. Abolish abortion.

-9

Anonymous #5 8w

make abortion easy access and free!!💯💯

12

Anonymous #6 8w

I said reflection not deflection😂🧐🤩

-9

Anonymous #5 8w

okay chud.

9

Anonymous #6 8w

Foid, foid, go away spark my cortisol another day

-8

Anonymous #5 8w

In our polity, yes

7

Anonymous #1 8w

A Professor from Johns Hopkins with a permissions until 2029, was detained at an airport, and just released today.

14

Anonymous #1 7w

I mean if right is disagreeing with international law, sure you are

8

Anonymous #5 7w

You could literally have gotten that from wemakefalescience.com lmao

4

Anonymous #5 6w

Anyone can own a slave! Men can’t get pregnant hope this helps.

3

Anonymous #1 6w

Shut the hell up

1

Anonymous #8 6w

Tf you gonna do about it? Sounds like you’re pissed I’m speaking the truth

-1

Anonymous #1 6w

Ha! MF shut your privilege ass down! Those are concentration camps. Also they were thrown in there by a secret masked police without any legal procedure. So much so that literal American citizens have been thrown in there

12

Anonymous #2 6w

You thought you ate😂 they definitely were thrown in there by proper procedure by following the law. Also actively interfering with an investigation and resisting a peace officer is a crime. You should probably read the laws and regulations instead of using your emotions regarding this matter

-2

Anonymous #1 6w

*People are being beheaded* #1: 🤓☝🏽 “IT’S THE LAW!!! THE LAW SAYS IT’S PERMISSIBLE THOUGH SO IT’S OKAY 🥰👌🏽 “

3

Anonymous #8 6w

Completely different matter but okay. No need to twist things

-1

Anonymous #1 6w

A sign of low emotional intelligence

-1

Anonymous #1 6w

Bro people are being thrown in CAMPS, BEING RAPED, PHYSICALLY ABUSED BEING DENIED LIFE SAVING MEDICATION, FOOD, WATER. But it’s good to know you draw the line at beheading. You deserve a consensual kissy for that 😘.

1

Anonymous #8 6w

Sounds like a personal problem to me. Gotta use some common sense, if you’re illegal, violating the law, resisting an officer, or committing any crimes in general, you deserve to be in prison. Prisons are supposed to be harsh lmao. They’re not concentration camps, they’re not being unalived in mass numbers

-2

Anonymous #1 6w

Okay so you’re just evil. Got it. And if you belive someone should be treated like that because they are an “illegal immigrant” then you can discuss that with the God you pray to, but you do realize they are detaining Americans citizens as well?

1

Anonymous #8 6w

Dang you do show signs of low emotional intelligence. Sounds like you are consumed by the media and take everything you see out of context

0

Anonymous #1 6w

But what if certain political opinions people hold are intentionally created to foster hate against another group? Like why do we have to treat racist dogma like the "Great Replacement Theory" as equal to anything?

5

Anonymous #1 6w

Bro what…? emotional intelligence is the ability to empathize and understand others. And based on our exchange you’d have low emotional intelligence.

4

Anonymous #1 6w

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

3

Anonymous #1 6w

"Genuinely still not a concentration camp" well it's not exactly The Ritz-Carlton either. You have to be blind and deaf not to see how horrible they are.

1