
Yeah it’s really disgusting and dehumanizing but there will always be men who believe it’s fine because they are incels who thinks a woman is only good for sex and children. Or they were done wrong by a woman so it makes it ok to call someone that. It’s really embarrassing how some men resort to calling women nasty names instead of growing the fuck up and letting it go.
It’s not about being mean it’s about calling women something dehumanizing. I don’t agree that women should call men wallets though. But at the same time being called a wallet has no sexual context. But if you’d like to compare, I’d love to hear what type of mean things you’ve been called for you to disagree so publicly.
like i agree but doesn’t the normalization of dehumanization kinks, to an extent, perpetuate the idea that women are only objects and that it’s “in their biology”? i don’t think it’s something we should shame ofc bc it’s not their fault they feel kinky abt it but i don’t think it’s something we should necessarily encourage either yk
Bc twink has, at the moment, become basically what the word gay was in the 2000s: a socially acceptable way to be blatantly and casually homophobic, even though many used it without thinking even once about the deeper implications of using it as an insult. In this context, it’s very clear to me and likely the other downvoters that this was intended to be derogatory towards effeminate gay men, whether that be very minimally so with little thought put into it or very much so
Ok so you’re definitely an exception, but you do realize you sound exactly like the straights online using that word, right? I had nothing to go on about anything about you other than what you said and based on the sheer amount of straight people I’ve seen use that word like gay was used in the 2000s, it was safest to assume you were one of them