Anonymous #2 3w

“gender war gender war” please shut the fuck up you childish POS

31

Anonymous #1 3w

Arguably just as bad or worse

23

Anonymous #7 3w

so you’re just weird

37

Anonymous #4 3w

How’s that weird

-11

Anonymous #7 3w

Dehumanizing all women because god forbid someone think you’re not an asshole

18

Anonymous #5 3w

Arguably a meme/joke

16

Anonymous #8 3w

How is that dehumanizing?

-14

Anonymous #7 3w

Why does it matter if people think you’re including trans women 💀

13

Anonymous #9 3w

In certain contexts how would it not matter? If I say I’m only attracted to women why would I lead transwomen on by lying?

-4

Anonymous #7 3w

You’re kinda shooting yourself in the foot by saying that cause most people aren’t trans and it’s already gonna give you a bad look. Easier to just say no I apologize I’m not into trans women

22

Anonymous #9 3w

I still don’t get how it’s dehumanizing. If someone refers to a man as a male is that dehumanizing too??

-3

Anonymous #7 3w

Because we refer to animals as male and female, reduces women down to reproductive organs, and you’re using an adjective as a noun. It removes personhood

15

Anonymous #10 3w

Cringe asf

6

Anonymous #7 3w

so you’re attracted to chopped women? to trash women? to idiot women? It’s just a fucking adjective dumbass. Say women.

7

Anonymous #12 3w

Oh my god that is worse

8

Anonymous #8 3w

Human beings are animals.

-1

Anonymous #4 3w

It’s just a fucking adjective, and it’s just a fucking noun. Literally getting worked up over nothing lmao

-2

Anonymous holmes.hog.cranker 3w

I feel like yikyak is full of tiktok personalities who think everything they do and say is so profound and unique but its literally exactly what everyone else on tiktok is doing. Maybe im just judgy tho

0

Anonymous #7 3w

then use the right term, idiot

5

Anonymous #7 3w

i’m tired of you dehumanizing troglodytes. your existence is antithetical to your beliefs. You dehumanize others but are too genuinely stupid to change and evolve your vocabulary with society. Oh, the irony is too much to bear.

2

Anonymous #4 3w

Again, I haven’t dehumanized anyone unlike you referring to women as chopped, trash, or idiots. And you speak of irony?

0

Anonymous #7 3w

“female” as a term is dehumanizing. Using adjectives with negative connotations to bring forth the point that you ONLY exclude TRANS women and not any other women to disprove the point that it’s because ur scared of ppl thinking you are attracted to trans women ISNT dehumanizing. How are you in college, dude.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

I disagree, female isn’t a negative connotation, it’s a biological reality. I’m not scared of people thinking I’m attracted to trans woman, the fuck? I’m just being upfront that I’m not interested in males. Your other examples don’t even work because I can say I’m not interested in chopped/trash/an idiot women or whatever, but that person might not think they’re chopped/trash/an idiot

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

However if I say I’m not attracted to males, it’s 100% clear of who I’m not interested in.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

trans women biologically aren’t makes

5

Anonymous #7 3w

males*

5

Anonymous #7 3w

so that just doesn’t work

3

Anonymous #7 3w

there’s genuinely too much nuance with gender and sex for trans women to be considered biologically male, especially with intersex women and such, so it’s genuinely just an adjective that describes a specific subset of women. “Females” doesn’t exclude trans women, it just alludes to you not having a brain

9

Anonymous #7 3w

Dipshit we’ve explained how it’s dehumanizing and you’re still convinced it isn’t? When women are telling you it is?

4

Anonymous #4 3w

Now you’re just being intellectually dishonest or obtuse. Trans woman are biologically males. There is a reason we call them trans.

0

Anonymous #8 3w

It’s the same as you calling a man a male. Thats not dehumanizing it’s just reality.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

Congrats on feeling that way, however as a woman I am telling you that it is dehumanizing to be called a female. Please keep doing it so the women around you know that you are disgusting and can avoid you properly❤️

11

Anonymous #8 3w

Whatever. I’ll just find one that agrees with my perspective ❤️

-2

Anonymous #8 3w

All this energy for me and you had nothing to say for #2 who had a real disgusting take, unlike mine. I just don’t understand it, you don’t have to be a fucking asshole.

-2

Anonymous #7 3w

Trans women in general aren’t males biologically, especially since that term encapsulates intersex women and other exceptions.

6

Anonymous #7 3w

I literally already shut #2 up, now it’s your turn.

8

Anonymous stolas 3w

it’s very common irl as well

2

Anonymous #4 3w

About .0018% of people are intersex. The exception doesn’t disprove the rule.

-1

Anonymous #2 3w

shut the fuck up #2

2

Anonymous #7 3w

ok? I only brought forth one exception to show you an example of the scientific and situational nuance I’m talking about. The exception shows that the rule is flawed and language has evolved along with human intelligence. If you’re left behind, that just shows your inability to evolve. Troglodyte.

11

Anonymous #4 3w

The rule still applies to over 99% of people how is that flawed?

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

outside of any medical context, Women have stated that it’s dehumanizing. Exceptions also exist. So outside of any genuine medical context, it’s flawed.

5

Anonymous #7 3w

“how is it flawed if it makes a large chunk of the population feel dehumanized”

6

Anonymous holmes.hog.cranker 3w

what’s hilarious is that select people still don’t understand it. Until people understand, it’s gonna keep being restated.

5

Anonymous #4 3w

Ok I’m not gonna die on this hill and go around calling people females. I just don’t agree with the logic that it’s dehumanizing. You can feel however you want about it. And so can I.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

I’m sure calling someone a troglodyte enough times will help them understand

0

Anonymous #7 3w

hopefully!

3

Anonymous #7 3w

Because I was hoping there was a chance you’d listen and learn, #2 is fucking hopeless. Too bad you proved me wrong. You don’t have to be a fucking asshole either but you’re so set on calling women females specifically to exclude trans women, dehumanizing all of us along the way

7

Anonymous #7 3w

Sometimes you just gotta call a spade a spade

3

Anonymous #8 3w

The only thing I ever said was that I don’t view it as dehumanizing. I was never an asshole and never said I was set on calling women females. I only said that I preferred the term females because it’s more direct and gets straight to the point.

0

Anonymous #4 3w

Wait what how are trans women not biologically male? Thats like the whole point of trans. Biologically one sex and transitioned to another. If someone has a penis they are biologically male (obv intersex is an exception) Am i wrong about this

4

Anonymous #7 3w

And calling people something they have told you is dehumanizing makes you an asshole. End of. You’re literally saying women having a vagina is more important than anything else. Ironically enough you are including trans men soooo

6

Anonymous #8 3w

It is more important when it comes to attraction. If I want to have kids I can’t do that with another male? Yes I am well aware that I am including trans men.

0

Anonymous #5 3w

external sexual reproductive organs aren’t the only thing that provides a basis of sex. You can have “male” External sex markers with “female” reproductive organs, dominant “female” hormones, chromosomal abnormalities, and much more. If an individual is born with a penis but has XX chromosomes and Estrogen is their dominant sex hormone, who is to say that person is biologically male? And under that logic, where do you draw the line? Penis with XY and still est? Vagina with XY and test? nuance

3

Anonymous #7 3w

Oh good so women only matter to you if they’re fertile and have vaginas. Just fuck the rest of us. Please never interact with women ever Jesus Christ

8

Anonymous #4 3w

That’s interesting. I did not know it could be so complex. Peoples genitals and sexes are really nobodies business. I was just curious tho, thanks for informing me 😎

1

Anonymous #7 3w

L rizz bro

1

Anonymous #5 3w

yeah np, i love biology

5

Anonymous #8 3w

Holy gaslight. If I am talking about women I’m attracted to then yes. Just because I am not attracted to a certain type of woman does not mean they don’t matter to me. Do you normally engage conversations in bad faith like this? Holy fuck.

-1

Anonymous #9 3w

L comment bro. Wasn’t trying to rizz.

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

Do you know what gaslighting is

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Do you know what arguing in good faith is?

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

there’s no good faith when you dehumanize a whole group of people, asshole

11

Anonymous #4 3w

This mf really thinks “I don’t think it’s dehumanizing” is a good argument too, atp I’m arguing in hopes that other people don’t fall down the same path

1

Anonymous #4 3w

I didn’t dehumanize anyone 🤦🏻‍♂️

4

Anonymous #8 3w

This mf really thinks me trying to categorize people in a certain way that I’m attracted to means I don’t care about anyone else and shouldn’t interact with them.

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

I mean you literally have been dehumanizing women, whether you think you are or not is irrelevant. I think anyone who dehumanizes people shouldn’t interact with that group because clearly they don’t matter to them. The misogyny runs deep here

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Should I not interact with men then since I refer to them as males? Is that dehumanizing men? Is that misandry?

0

Anonymous #8 3w

You can keep saying I don’t care about woman all you want but that will never make that statement true. I haven’t been dehumanizing woman, whether you think I have or not.

0

Anonymous #7 3w

I’ve been telling you that as a woman, that is a dehumanizing. I’ve never met a woman who didn’t think it was dehumanizing. Whether or not you think it is or isn’t doesn’t matter. You cannot care about women when you are actively dismissing what women have been telling you

1

Anonymous #8 3w

Yall should just get married lowkey yall argue like my mom and dad

5

Anonymous #8 3w

You’ve been actively dismissing me this whole convo 😭 Just because I don’t agree with your point of view doesn’t mean that I don’t care about women. According to you I just don’t care about my mom or sister now because I don’t think the word female is dehumanizing? I should just cut off my family?

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

I hate to break it to you but when you aren’t part of a group you can’t speak on their behalf. You don’t get to decide what is and isn’t dehumanizing for women if you are not a woman. Crazy how you struggle to understand simple logic and basic fucking respect

3

Anonymous #8 3w

I wasn’t speaking on anyone’s behalf, I was just stating my opinion about a fucking word. I’ve been trying to have basic fucking respect for you this whole time but you’ve been extremely rude and condescending from the jump. The sad thing is I’m willing to have my mind changed but when you keep inserting this bullshit that I don’t care about women when I know I fucking do isn’t going to get us anywhere

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

You WEREN’T willing to have your mind changed because this entire time, no matter what anyone said, you would just say some dumbass shit about how you don’t think it’s dehumanizing therefore it’s fine. At no point were you actually willing to listen. There has been zero respect and it’s fucking pathetic that you think like this as an adult. If it wasn’t already obvious, referring to women as females has always been and will continue to be dehumanizing, no matter how far you dig your heels in

-1

Anonymous #8 3w

I WAS and still am willing to have my mind changed, you’re the one who’s been acting like a child this entire time. At no point I was trying to listen? You haven’t even tried to see where I was coming from. Instead you insult me and call me names and lie about my position like a child would and that’s no way to change somebody’s mind. You’re just a hypocrite.

-1

Anonymous #7 3w

I explained ad nauseam that calling women “females” is dehumanizing. Every time you just went “nuh uh.” If you’re gonna dehumanize 50% of the population then it’s not an insult to be called mean names, it’s just throwing the same shit back in your face. Cry me a fuckin river

0

Anonymous #7 3w

I’ve read all of these notifications and #7 if you’ve been meaning to come off as open, you’ve not painted yourself that image. I understand what you mean but unfortunately gender isn’t the same as sex, especially not how you see it. You see it as a broad term, but you haven’t come across as open minded.

10

Anonymous #8 2w

If someone does something that offends you but they’re not trying to they’re just not understanding how it’s offensive, your answer is to insult them back? That seems really immature and counterproductive for changing someone’s opinion.

0

Anonymous #6 2w

Hard to come across as open minded when #8 keeps trying to imply that I don’t like women and won’t argue in good faith. I know gender isn’t the same as sex, I don’t remember ever implying they were the same?

0

Anonymous #7 2w

I’ve explained exactly *why* it’s offensive, but to remind you: we refer to animals as female, not humans. It implies the single most important part of a woman is her genitals. It also implies that the only women you see value in are the ones you are attracted to. The last time I tried explaining this very basic concept to, you simply said nuh uh. You have yet to provide any rationale beyond “I don’t think it is”

3

Anonymous #8 2w

I am trying to relate to your pov. Do you think I want a woman to just see me as my genitals and nothing else? Of course not. But if a woman were to have my position, where she states that she only wanted to date males, I wouldn’t then make the assumption that the only value she sees in men as a whole are their penis. It’s just a prerequisite for dating. There are plenty of women that I find value in that I’m not attracted to at all so I’m not understanding how I’m implying otherwise???

4

Anonymous #8 2w

Also I’m sorry I didn’t realize so many women found being called female was offensive. I’ve had a few people anonymously on this app send me a DM asking “M or F?”. It’s never “M or W?” A lot of times it ends being a woman that asked too. I never meant to make anyone feel dehumanized I just prefer being direct and sometimes female seems like a more accurate term to use

-4

Anonymous #7 2w

There’s a difference between being direct and being more concerned about what’s in someone’s pants. For future reference, when someone tells you something is dehumanizing, consider listening instead of coming up with excuses for why it’s okay for you to do it

5

Anonymous #8 2w

I view it more so as not wasting time than being concerned with what’s in someone’s pants.

0

Anonymous #7 2w

Not wasting time based entirely on what someone’s genitals are. It would only be a waste of time if their genitals aren’t what you want them to be. Either way it changes nothing, intent isn’t the problem here

0

Anonymous #8 2w

Why r yall still arguing over this

4

Anonymous #8 2w

It seems disrespectful af if I were to waste somebody’s time and they didn’t have the right set of genitals. Im not into dick and never will be. I can’t control that. Idk about you but I actually want to be attracted to the person I’m with.

0

Anonymous #7 2w

And there are ways to go about that without dehumanizing people, like for instance being normal and saying you’re straight. The vast majority of people understand what that means and will behave accordingly

1

Anonymous #8 2w

I bet you don’t even dip

-2

Anonymous #12 2w

What the fuck does that mean

1

Anonymous #8 2w

lol who the fuck knows

0

Anonymous #8 2w

Bro doesn’t even dip 😒

0