Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
people who didn’t gaf about gun violence until the charlie kirk sh00ting
upvote 216 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

They still don’t even care about gun violence fr. There was literally another school shooting that exact same day, but not once did they show any concern for that

upvote 39 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Need an actually solution to gun violence though, taking guns away does nothing

upvote 30 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Tbf, those people still don’t really care about gun violence, they just have a huge victim complex and charlie was the perfect fit to paint themselves as “in danger” or whatever

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

This is from the National Library of Medicine, I’d love to know what source you all used! 😁

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

They killed the moderate and as a result further radicalized a generation of young men who were already become radical. The day of the rake is coming

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

U think charlie was a bad dude?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> perry_theplatypus 2w

funny you say victim complex when people on the left consistently hold a victim mentality.

upvote -9 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Funny you made this about left and right when the post was talking about people who didn’t care about gun violence until Charlie was killed. Are you suggesting that’s a right wing perspective?

upvote 17 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Funny to mention that when TPUSA members have been screaming about being victims for no reason

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> perry_theplatypus 2w

let us not pretend we do not recognize the motivation behind the post.

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

i haven't listened to TP members, and i actually believe people high up in TP committed fraud & the shooting of Kirk goes deeper than the people at play in power what to let on. cool facts, though, thanks!

upvote -6 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Fair enough, fair enough. Then a better point would be, which side is it that’s constantly depicting themselves as better than everyone else, yet at the same time claiming to be threatened by immigrants, the lgbtq community, the left, and so on and so forth? That seems like a victim complex imo

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

You’re the only one bringing politics into it and you’re the only one forcing the association of Charlie Kirk supporters being right wingers

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> perry_theplatypus 2w

i think that's a nuanced take & i could do the same with a near identical statement.

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

But if you so desperately want it to be about politics, yes TPUS is a right wing organization and Kirk was a right wing advocate, happy?

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

the motivation behind the post is clear when this a leftist talking point that has been reiterated over and over.

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

stating the obvious, are we?

upvote -6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

Thanks for telling me what my post is about. Go take a fucking Xanax, good lord

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

a lot of people do because they live in a media echo chamber and accept what the media feeds them about him. or, in the rare chance they've listened to him, it's out of context clips. not many are willingly to watch an hour of him conversing with people, or else we'd have a different situation at hand and more conversation

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

i have watched the hour long clips and still agree he was a bad guy

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #8 2w

Just cuz u disagree w him smh

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

yep, literally because they disagree with him. he provided the largest platform and ability for those who disagree with him to speak their minds for millions to hear. i understand calling Nick Fuentes a bad guy, not Charlie.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

I think you forgot to take that Xanax, bud

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

i think you should become more creative, bud. 🫶🏼

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

i feel that that’s a redundant point is it not? you either dislike a person due to personal issues or through disagreements of ideas. with that being said, i do disagree with quite a few things he preached but not all — however i feel that the points he an i would disagree on do validate my opinion

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

It’s actually embarrassing how desperate you are to turn this into a political debate. Idolizing politicians is the bottom of the barrel in terms of depressing

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 2w

i’m glad we can agree about nick though 😮‍💨

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Truthfully, anyone who says that if his daughter was r@p3d he would force her to have the baby is a bad person. Regardless of political stance if you can’t acknowledge how disturbing that is then you’re just as bad as #5. His daughter is in like elementary school so it’d be a miracle if she didn’t di3 during child birth

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

He said the baby would be delivered. What a funny way for you to phrase that he would choose life over murder. 1 victim instead of 2. Having the opinion that abortion doesn’t help or treat rape doesn’t make u a bad person you just demonize people who disagree with u

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

He said that if his daughter was r@p3d he would not let the baby be ab0rted. If you’re just ignorant, google the quote and inform yourself. If you’re intentionally making things up then that’s just sad

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Yo dumbass did u not read wat I just said

upvote -3 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Yo dumbass you read what you said yourself? “He would choose life over murder” then saying “1 victim over 2”. Dude would let his daughter, A CHILD, give birth. If she died, he assisted in her murder because he wouldn’t allow her the care she needed, the abortion she needed, so that she would survive. You’re a sick perverted fuck to want A CHILD to carry a rapists baby to full term.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

U think murder is the solution to rape. I think neither is okay. You have the morals of a rock

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

This does not necessarily mean he is a bad person. I don’t agree with his position on this but you got to realize from his pov atleast, which is that a life is being killed and he is very religious and values all life/Gods creations. And there is also stories of kids being born living great lives when their mom was a R victim. I don’t agree but y do we have to hate so many people when they really r not that bad of a person as we think

upvote 4 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

So when his daughter dies because her body could not accommodate the baby, who will be at fault?

upvote 5 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

And you have the thinking skills of a child who refuses to understand things beyond their opinion.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Did he say he would save baby over daughters life if some issue occurred, cause I’m sure if there a good chance his daughter will die he would abort it to save her life

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

He prioritized an unborn fetus’ life above all. Watch his ‘debates’ and you would come to that conclusion. After all, aren’t you a heavy Kirk supporter?

upvote 8 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

You also didn’t answer my question.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Correct me if I’m wrong. You think rape justifies murder.

upvote -2 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

I answer you with a question of my own. Are you a Christian?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

This is completely secular. U can’t answer the question bc it calls out ur ridiculous take to frame someone u disagree w as a bad person

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Are you Christian?

upvote 1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Nondenominational. And until the other person responds, which I doubt they will, it is likely due to the fact that the Bible is hypocritical in its word when it comes to murder as many apply to it today.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Ur already wrong. I’m agnostic. Dumbass

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Name calling? Such a new concept.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Running from the fact u think rape justifies murder. Have a good one

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Murder is the killing of a human being. What defines a human being? Conception or the development of a mind and physical body with its entire functions? Would you call a mother who gives birth to a stillborn child a murderer as well?

upvote 3 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Unlike you I can come up with my answer in less than half an hour without provocation, thank you.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Knew I was wasting my time. It’s a scientific fact that it’s a human being from conception. Inform and educate yourself with the facts before you make a fool of yourself again

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

An organism begins at conception, personhood does not. Follow your own advice before attempting to do so to others

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

So clearly you didn’t read what I’ve said twice, and now three times. If his daughter is r@p3d he would have the baby delivered. His daughter being a little girl would need a miracle to survive giving birth. He knows this. Anyone with a brain knows this. He is well aware she would very likely die. He does not care. To sacrifice your own child to appease your religion is disgusting

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

Why u coming after me now, keep it respectful. Once again I don’t agree with him for R victims. Just been trying to show he ain’t a bad person. And just did some research which is why haven’t responded yet, and yes I found that if performing a vaginal birth and there is risk for mother he believes we should still try and keep kid alive, but he said if there is a risk you should perform and emegeceny c section and that the risk is way less than anyone actually thinks.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

About .0097% of emergency c section results in a death. That is very slow chance of happening, things like driving a car r riskier than that

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> she_mew_on_my_strap_til_i 2w

You said human being. Look at you walking back on ur words cuz yk ur wrong

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Even lower chance of dying if no random complications occur which is most births

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

You’re ignoring the fact that she’s a 10 year old. These statistics apply to grown women, and even then there are many grown women who go through complications. A 10 year old would die. Stop trying to defend him.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Still about a 1% chance a 10 year old dies from childbirth btw. Ur assuming statistics to try to support ur narrative and it’s not working. U need to be educated first

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

^ I found this stat very surprising myself and thought they would be way higher, yes a 10 year old there r more risk involved but it is much safer than u think

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

“Assuming statistics” as you say 1%. Be fucking serious. The hypocrisy is wild. You all are actually insane. Let’s normalize individualized Christianity. Stop following the main course religion like blind sheep. A 10 year old would not survive. End of story.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

And mind you my “narrative” had NOTHING to do with anything political until you all turned it into such in order to defend Kirk, despite the post being about gun violence💀

upvote 2 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 2w

Murder is killing of a human being. Brain function begins around 25-28 weeks which is when personhood would also begin, technically. So at that point abortion would be murder, any earlier would not. How am I going back on my words?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Please just look it up I had no idea either. It’s actually under .06% if they r under 15

upvote -1 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

You’re absolutely right, and we all know how much research is even directed towards women/girls. Not to mention how many cases of raped girls goes under the radar, especially those who are forced to carry it to term

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 2w

Becoming*

upvote 1 downvote