Anonymous #11 10w

it's actually disgusting. there's over 70million people born in our generation. there was 800 people in my graduation class in town of about 100k. if you can find someone that's fr on you

55

Anonymous #11 10w

Exactly 2007 was one of the biggest years for births EVER

25

Anonymous #11 10w

the way they assigned the role of submission & servitude to women who dont even EXIST yet needs to be studied😭

29

Anonymous #11 10w

unrelated to the post but isnt a town of 100k more like a city?

4

Anonymous #11 10w

ok nvm i looked it up and it seems like the definition is fairly variable. my town is technically considered a city but only has like <20k people, so i was basing it on that

1

Anonymous #14 10w

yeah, i used to live in a town with less than 20k ppl and it was technically considered a village. my town just covers a very small area so i think thats why its not considered a city

6

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

BAHAHAHA love this

1

Anonymous ireallylikepancakes 10w

afflicted with incel fr

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Birth rate is supposed to keep going up, if it stopped rising after 2007 that’s probably a bad sign and abortion is def to blame. That being said, I’m not using that as an excuse for mot being able to pull.

1

Anonymous #18 10w

Not*

1

Anonymous #18 10w

saying abortion is definitely to blame for declining birth rate in first world countries is wild, there are so many other explanations lmfao

9

Anonymous #14 10w

73 million × 20 years ≈ 1.46 billion abortions over the last 20 years.

4

Anonymous #14 10w

World Health Organization estimates “About 73 million induced abortions occur each year worldwide. “

2

Anonymous #18 10w

i was talking about first world countries

1

Anonymous #18 10w

babe the birth rate is going down bc no one wants kids. bc no one has money to raise them. abortion is one of the ways people avoid that. but also using condoms , birth control, and not having sex is another way

5

Anonymous #11 10w

Yeah nobody wants kids is the problem that’s why they all try to justify abortion. Not because it’s moral or should be legal, it’s because they don’t want them. It does not make it okay. Unwanted babies are no different than babies. Ask any kid that was born a result of a failed abortion they choose life over death everytime.

1

Anonymous #11 10w

Please look into Safe Haven Laws - Every state has a Safe Haven law that allows a parent to surrender a newborn anonymously and without criminal charges, provided the baby is within the state’s age limit

2

Anonymous #18 10w

Money is not a reason to ever abort a baby. A life is priceless, I’d rather grow up hungry than not grow up at all. And with safe haven laws you don’t have to raise the child at all.

-1

Anonymous #18 10w

maybe they choose life over death because they’re actually people now? fetuses aren’t babies btw

0

Anonymous #17 10w

Where do you draw the line?

2

Anonymous #18 10w

the line depends on the circumstances, same as for other morally ambiguous questions. is killing wrong? sure, but if someone is breaking into your house and you think they're gonna kill you so you kill them first, that's widely accepted as justified, at least to some extent, and to different extents depending on the circumstances. i would say for fully elective abortions i would draw the line around the viability point

5

Anonymous #18 10w

which is around 24 weeks. but i don't support laws based on that timeframe because they have a chilling effect which makes doctors scared to perform abortions past that point, even when medically necessary. i think it should be a medical guideline, not a law. as for medically necessary abortion, i don't think theres any point in a pregnancy where that would be morally wrong, because if it's necessary, it's a question of the mothers health, which trumps the fetus.

0

Anonymous #18 10w

for states without abortion bans, elective abortions are not typically performed past the viability point. in general elective abortions tend to be earlier in pregnancy. if someone is aborting in the third trimester, its fairly safe to say that they did not want that to happen. why on earth would you carry a fetus you didn't want to have up to that point, instead of getting an early term abortion?

2

Anonymous #18 10w

and if you aren't comfortable killing an embryo or early fetus, i would ask whether you feel comfortable killing bugs, livestock, pests, etc. and if so, why? even bugs arguably have a more developed CNS and sense of pain/desire to live than a fetus. livestock most certainly do. is it just because the cells in them are human rather than cow, or fly, or chicken?

5

Anonymous #18 10w

Yes throw them in the system known got sexual abuse and general abuse, let them never have a stable home and grow up resentful of life. Also pregnancy is extremely hard on the woman’s body so it’s not worth it

4