
it depends on how they’re being portrayed. people were upset that The Little Mermaid was black even though her race had nth to do with the plot. being upset over that is racist since her race did not matter AT ALL in the story. but if they took mulan and changed her race it’d be different since her background is a very important part of the story.
Growing up as a black girl I saw myself in Percy Jackson, Harry Potter, Tiana, Meredith, Mulan, Katniss, Peeta, Ari, the Black Panther, Mike Wazowski and every other badass character I liked. I’m not saying it’s racist but it’s close minded. I used to love this movie bc I saw myself in Ariel but now she’s brown and it’s ruined for me. like bro you can relate to a mermaid but not if she’s black though? Give me a break.
not to mention, a lot of the reason characters started off as white is because of racism during the time of the story's creation. poc character's didn't have the headstart on starring in media that white one's did so it's totally fine for a movie/show make up for that imbalance of representation in remakes where race doesn't affect the plot in the slightest.
Idk seems kinda lazy to plug in different actors instead of creating new stories to represent actual diverse audiences. I’m Danish and a redhead so growing up the little mermaid was my favorite movie because of my looks and stories that got passed down from generation to generation. But when the Disney live action came out, it felt like all of that was being ignored lol
the way that you felt ignored when the live action came out is how all of us black people felt growing up… you still got represented first, black people getting representation as well takes nothing away from you. but i do agree that they need more originals instead of retelling the same story
Your do realize that the version of little mermaid that has red hair in it hasn’t been disturbed or corrupted by a new version with different representation right? For instance, the character Steve Rogers HAS to be white because it’s key to his story. But Captain America (as a role) does not have to be filled by a white man while maintaining story integrity. This is of course different with a character like Dracula, Black Panther, etc. 1/2
I’m not saying your desire for red headed characters is wrong, but I do think it’s somewhat absurd to be unaware of how many more redheaded characters (literally characters of any demographic) of white origin than they’re are of any other racial background. Essentially in America, there’s never been an accurate amount of POC in almost any film (as in non beholden of population), if you want a Danish movie then make one. These characters are public domain! + the original animation can’t be beat!
As for your point about original stories, what side of the “Sinners” controversy were you on? In America at least, the movie became a huge speaking point for conservative and racists a like throughout the nation. My point in making this statement is to emphasize that creating films for and by ourselves still comes with an equal amount if not more pushback from the general pubic of both movie goers and active political commentators.
I understand and empathize with the Black community on the lack of representation, I really do believe that there needs to be more accurate representation of the Black community in mass media. However, do we really have to take away from one community to give to another? That seems a bit unfair. I know it’s a children’s movie but discussions like these have greater implications to the kind of impact that is left behind.
I disagree with the notion that anything has been taken, for example movies like beauty and the beast, classic animated films will always exist. My exposure to them (as many American children’s) came from school. Those films aren’t going anywhere. Movie day in elementary school is safe! How does creating a new rendition of a film with different actors take something away from a community?
Sure thing. I am at the movie spread in anti-white mentality and portrayed white people as villains or as the sort of colonizer. This could not be further from the truth however, the movie hinged on culture distinctly and was actually about how different ones can interact and have similar experiences, but come to different conclusions. The only references to culture being “stolen” was in form of music specifically. Which has happened and continues to throughout the history of modern music.
“Do we have to take away from one community to give to another” broski they’re not going back and reanimating the little mermaid to make her black. They made a live action movie and choose to cast Halle Bailey. Now black kids can dress up as Tiana or Little Mermaid. If a red head dresses up as the little mermaid no one’s going to be confused. The character just looks like more people now.
Not really. You were claiming that them casting a Black actress made you feel like something was being “taken away from your community”. Whereas the original movie you love is still released, untouched. However, the Black community got bashed solely for Halle being chosen because people disagreed with the casting, and there’s still people complaining about her being Black. Now tell me again which community was actually affected…
I didn’t care about her race, I was just so annoyed they didn’t have the bright red hair for her. Ariel’s red hair is so iconic and my fav part of her design. That’s what most people I knew were upset by, but others twisted into a race thing bc they thought it was about the hair style and not hair color :( (That’s specific to my group/school tho)