Anonymous #2 21h

There’s a reason the phrase “not all men but enough men” exists

3

Anonymous #1 19h

That’s literally the same argument a lot of racists have about any specific race. How is it any different in this case and make your stance morally justified?

-3

Anonymous #4 17h

It’s different because it’s not about race???

3

Anonymous #4 17h

There’s a difference between systemic racism and women’s experiences with men and actual statistics

3

Anonymous #2 16h

This sounds like a justification or expression a racist would use. Especially since yes, there’s a pattern when it comes to crime-statistically you’re more likely to be harmed or mugged by a man. But not all are the same + it’s not like it’s biological or solely a male thing. Race can absolutely be synonymous in this context. There can be patterns but to generalize a whole group? idk…

0

Anonymous #1 15h

there isn’t a difference in the discrimination, racism and misogyny are both still widespread, but realistically neither should be okay, including towards men

0

Anonymous #6 14h

Yeah but unlike racism and misogyny, there is a reason the hate started. Now you and the others can keep comparing this systemic racism or we can have the good men hold the bad men accountable to help reduce the hate.

1

Anonymous #1 12h

They are both pre conceived notions about someone based on some social category. My point being that saying “ not all black people but enough black people” is totally racist, but saying “not all men but enough men” is not sexist?

0

Anonymous #4 1m

No one says “not all black people but enough black people” and anyone that does is racist. “Not all men but enough men” just means that we, as women understand that it is not all men, however, it is enough men that we feel the need to be cautious around all men. Sometimes a spade is just a spade and trying to make it more than it is only minimizing the issue.

2