
No one thinks all men are rapists and that they will all hurt them. The issue is that it’s extremely difficult to tell until they’re already in a dangerous situation (man catcalled them and they refused their advances and are now being threatened with violence for instance), so the best policy is caution in all or most interactions with unfamiliar men. Not currently in the headspace for a discussion on this so hopefully either I will be tomorrow or someone else will pick up the torch for me,-
Well this is a true statement but I'm a little confused about the point of it. Who's really saying it's all men? And if you have seen people make blanket statements like that, what they likely really mean is 1. it's often safer for women to assume that any man COULD be a rapist for their own safety or 2. rape culture is a systemic issue linked to the patriarchy that shouldn't just be framed as a few bad apples
The broad cultural rise of women being afraid all the time is deleterious to everyone: women have the burden of needing to be tense to feel virtuous (and yet violence etc still occurs), men feel increasingly unwelcome and unwanted (some take this badly...to say the least)..... If you watch 90s media people just casually flirt and banter and no one feels the need to be on guard all the time
honestly i really hate the words im about to say because i stg im going to sound right leaning but im lowkey tired of the snowflakeisms and the victim culture that has spread rampant through the world. everyone is always constantly on alert because either 1. everyone thinks someone is out to get them, or 2. believes that everyone else believes that they are out to get someone. no one is allowed to generally be nice anymore without being accused of being a “freak” “rapid” “danger”
No man. Listen, if a dog bites you, you’re going to naturally be scared of dogs. Does that mean that all dogs are bad? No! There are plenty of warm, loving, loyal dogs out there. You might even adopt one. But there’s going to be that initial fear when you don’t know if the next dog you see is one of the “well behaved” ones or one of the “dangerous” ones, because you’ve experienced both and it’s hard to tell at first glance.
comparing humans, a species that has evolved to develop emotional intelligence situational awareness, to dogs is not a fair comparison. dogs are heavily influenced by their direct surroundings. unless you socialize your dogs and work that prey instinct out, yeah your dog runs the risk of being more dangerous than a dog who is heavily socialized.
Look, it doesn’t even matter what’s more dangerous on average. The same analogy would work with any other animal. What matters is the uncertainty that you get when encountering something that has hurt you in the past. It’s the feeling of thinking, “Is this one of the ‘good’ ones, or one of the ‘bad’ ones?” Which would naturally make you cautious (NOT hateful) by default. And sometimes you THINK it’s one of the good ones until time passes and they do something to betray your trust…