Anonymous #1 20h

No such thing, degenerate.

12

Comment Deleted

0

Not an ad tho

-5

Anonymous #1 20h

That is literally an advertisement for your degeneracy while missing the point of the post. You are disgusting and should feel shame for being a porn spammer at a minimum.

18

Its okay to have a differing opinion but you are not about to use my post for your temu onlyfans, you are blocked.

13

Anonymous #3 15h

The addition of consenting actors does not make the “production”/sex act performed for an exchange of money or services an ethical product. The objectification/commodification of human in such a capacity is unethical without even going into the coerciveness of the industry/society in a financial downfall.

7

Anonymous #3 15h

Objectifying the human is, has, and always will be unethical.

0

Anonymous #3 15h

What a weird comparison example to try to make and very apples to oranges while missing OP’s point lol

6

Anonymous OP 15h

NOW TELL THEM ABOUT THE BENEFITS TO WORKERS UNIONS COMRADE

2

Anonymous #1 13h

What 😭😭😭😭

0

Anonymous #4 13h

Shameless ethot. Ho’s do indeed be wildin

1

Anonymous #5 13h

Fictional or not, your partner or a stranger, it does not matter. You are reducing them down to nothing more than parts/functions related to parts. It conditions society to without realizing it begin to develop a less humane approach to a persons value by equating it to something so simple and carnal as lust for lust and/or lust for profit. This isnt even getting into the addictive nature of it for the viewer and so forth. Pornography is an immoral product.

6

Anonymous OP 13h

Furthermore, unlike other forms of labor that tend to produce a product; sex if successful from a biological perspective creates additional life. So if sex is not done for that purpose, and also not for intimacy, then doing it for money reduces the human body itself to being a product rather than a person being paid for something such as food, or entertainment, or for some act of tangible value. (not porn , porn is not entertainment but thats another take) porn is produced for money and/for

5

Anonymous OP 13h

Carnal fulfillment that is not beneficial to anybody or the biological act it primarily is used for (procreation) so being reduced to either being produced for money or to satiate somebodys horniness instead of having actual intimacy reduces the human once again into a commodity and not a living breathing sentient intelligent creature with a full range of emotions, thought processes, etc.

5

Anonymous OP 13h

I cant tell if you are arguing this from a religious perspective or feminist perspective or what. Well really neither but some of your points drifted towards almost sounding like feminist theory and stuff

1

Anonymous #2 13h

This isnt limited to women being objectified. Men are too. The male gaYze is not down to one gender, and also on a more serious note objectifying isnt limited to strictly men (just tend to be worse violators and heavier porn consumers it would seem)

6

Anonymous OP 13h

“The male gayze is limited to one gender”

1

Anonymous #2 13h

Im stealing that 2 use at sum point op ty bunches

1