Anonymous #5 4w

Birth control like many medications stores in fat cells. It’s not permanent but I’ve heard way too many stories of women getting on bc during teens. Staying on it until mid 20s and needing help to conceive but down the line not having any issues after their first child. Let’s not sit here and act like the Depo doesn’t cause cancer and nova ring wasn’t causing ovarian cysts. Bc is poison.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Then… get men on birth control or demand they do more research. :) ain’t our fault that doctors and researchers don’t care about women’s health like they do men’s.

1

Anonymous #5 4w

Who said anything about caring what men want or think?? Also men do have birth control has the same effects but less harmful. I made a statement and you made men the victims not me.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

I’m not making men the victim, I’m doing the opposite actually because the only form of birth control they use is the barrier methods, in some cases, vasectomies. 😬 which aren’t very affective now a days. Men don’t have to have pills, they don’t have to have implants of literal contraptions stuck inside them, etc. they aren’t victims, they’re far from it so idk where you got that idea from.

1

Anonymous #5 4w

They do have birth control for men. Like pills men refused to take them because of the side effects.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

No they aren’t dude.. with a quick google search you can see that they’re not even on the market, but in fucking testing. it’s not because they’re refusing to take them, it’s because they’re still in testing. :/

1

Anonymous #5 4w

Clinical trials are on final rounds it would have been done sooner but men complained about it too much during trials for the same symptoms that women deal withz

1

Anonymous OP 4w

…MY POINT EXACTLY. Women complain about the fucking symptoms 24/7 and they don’t fucking change them but the moment men did the ‘birth control’ is still in trial and they pushed it back. So why won’t they put female birth control back in testing to try and get rid of the symptoms???? If you want the cancer and shit to STOP THEN FIX THE PROBLEM. just saying.

1

Anonymous #5 4w

It’s not the cancer it was the weight gain, reduced libido, acne, and mood changes.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Also why do women have to take the brunt end of the bs, especially when men can take the same shit.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Because “the side effects aren’t fair 🥺” to them.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Exactly, I’m glad we can agree on that. Honestly imo reduced libido is good for both men and women. That’s going to be a given anyways because the birth control is working against pregnancy so of course they’re not going to have the same amount of sexual energy.

5

Anonymous #4 4w

A lot of things are too much for men nowadays. We have men (who are actually ‘manchildren’) who get overwhelmed from taking care of their own kids. Because they want the mother of their children to act like their mom and to take care of everything while still expecting sex and shit. 😬 it’s pathetic.

7

Anonymous #5 4w

It truly, truly is!!

5

Anonymous #4 3w

How about no more irresponsible sex with random people?

1

Anonymous #6 3w

Correct, men who can’t be responsible don’t deserve to have sex.

6

Anonymous #4 3w

Having sex outside of a relationship is irresponsible. For men and women

0

Anonymous #6 3w

No, pushing for celibacy-only approaches are unhealthy and irresponsible.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

Why? Why do so many people think having sex is so casual. You really shouldn’t be hooking up with anyone you met a party it’s immoral

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Not advocating for comprehensive sex education is immoral.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

Remind me when I said I was against CSE

0

Anonymous #6 3w

In trying to push for more celibacy-focused approaches. That has been shown to be more harmful.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

Explain to me what’s so harmful about not having sex outside of a relationship. Struggling to see the benefits of fucking any random person at a party you find attractive. Also I am not promoting celibacy I am promoting abstinence, there is a difference look it up. I’d also like to see where you found that celibacy-based approaches are harmful, can’t find that anywhere online.

0

Anonymous #6 3w

Not knowing what to look for in terms of infections and disease is harmful. Not having the appropriate vocabulary to discuss the body, its functions, and what is wrong is dangerous. Not knowing how to have safe sex is dangerous.

1

Anonymous #4 3w

I never disagreed with any of that?

1