
Just like you want to claim Persians are white which they aren’t, Italians were also not considered white before they were so you not know history. I wasn’t wrong you are just uneducated. No Persian/Persia is what the western outsiders called, they always called themselves Iran/Iranians.
So you don’t care about the actual origins of the story so why do you care if they change it. Roger and Hammerstein gave us a black Cinderella with an Asian (I believe he was Filipino) prince with a black mom and white dad which wouldn’t birth an Asian. You are missing the point that clearly originals don’t matter because Disney has never stay true to the telling of Grimm brothers stories.
Persia is simply the Latinized/Greek name for its native name, Iran. Also that's a hella assumption. "pale like Europeans" assumes Europeans are uniformly pale. They are not. Also paleness doesn't define race ; in fact nothing defines race. But genetically, Persians/Iranians are closer to Europeans than distance implies.
I’m from the U.S to further explain my, your race is based on your phenotypical presentation that is a U.S classification. That’s why ethnicity and nationality are factors, ugh. Persians/Iranians are closer to Caucasian for term being closer to the Caucasus mountains right on the edge. But we use Caucasian to really lump whites from Europe together.
Except it wasn’t. Zāl used a rope he brought to her palace to climb over the wall to be with Rudabah. If we’re counting that as being similar enough to the Rapunzel archetype, we can find plenty of other older stuff that’s close enough as well; Greek myths in particular were fond of having women locked up in towers, and later Christian folk stories took inspiration for these. The Shahnameh had little to no influence on the Petrosinella which is the actual origin of the Rapunzel story.
Persians are not a thing anymore not since 1935 let’s use the correct terms Iranians, technically are Asian because the country resides on the continent of Asia. They only claim white because of a 1910’s court case where a middle eastern man said if I’m not white then Jesus is not white because he originated from where I am. White people rather admit Middle Eastern are white than not because they won’t admit Jesus is not white.
But it was I’m not arguing with you on this, and if it was Italian first okay how many Italians say they are not white. Italians only became white by u.s metrics since you want to us that in the 1940’s and 1950’s, so it still wouldn’t be a white lady by that metric. If wanna say the woman is Italian.
Persia is the historically accurate term for both the ethnicity and nationality of Ferdowsi, so… no? Who gives a shit if it’s in Asia? They clearly do not share a phenotype with East Asians, anymore than Libyans share a phenotype with Subsaharan Africans. They’re closer genetically, phenotypically, and culturally to white Europeans than they are to East Asians. Also Italians aren’t white? Be so fucking for real dude lmao. You’re grasping for straws here, just own up and admit you were wrong.
Rapunzel isn’t Italian. The first story in the Rapunzel archetype is Petrosinella, sure, but the Rapunzel story that the movie is based on is the Brother’s Grimm story. There’s like four degrees of separation there. Ultimately it’s a German story featuring a German heroine, however you wanna slice that cake.
Yes I’m well aware of WASP discrimination. They thought the fucking IRISH weren’t white. What’s your point? That they actually aren’t because scientific racists in the 1800s wanted to distinguish between national identities? Correct. South Asians are genetically distinct from East Asians, and Middle Easterners, generally speaking, are distinct from them as well.
Look, I can pull up genetic data, millennia worth of historical and cultural interactions, or just the fact that every reputable organization on the planet disagrees with you, but you’re so convinced in your self-delusion that it doesn’t matter. You are OBJECTIVELY incorrect. You are FACTUALLY wrong according to sociologists, anthropologists, and geneticists. I still fail to see how this has any bearing on the RAPUNZEL story from the Brother’s Grimm though. Keep moving those goalposts.
No but you just said I was wrong when I said they weren’t always considered white. So if the story is off the Italian version in your mind then she isn’t white, so brothers Grimm ripped off a story, Disney is ripping off their story. Why does Disney have to do a white woman and not a woman with a subtle tan with long hair.
I didn’t say you were wrong in that they weren’t historically considered white, I said you were wrong because you seem to believe that Italians aren’t white. They are. Historical prejudices aside. It is a German character in a German story, and even if they were to directly adapt her as an Italian she’d still be white (Italians are white), but yeah no shit the Brother’s Grimm weren’t the original? They were collecting random folk stories (in this case Rapunzel was from Schulz’s Little Novels).
Not moving goal posts, you don’t actually about this shit man, gtfo my comment. I’m not convinced in any delusion. I fully believe Italians are white, Iranians no I’d go so far to actually says Caucasian technically because they are a part of that region of the Caucasian. But the story isn’t originally a German girl, what’s the matter if someone with a subtle tan but nice hair does it most of the hair will be cgi anyways.
The classification of Italians as non-white originated in the 1800s. It’s a moot point because phenotypically and genetically they are basically the same as every other European, sharing mostly the same haplogroups. The same is true of Middle Easterners. That’s why on modern U.S censuses, no distinction is made between European ethnic groups OR MENA individuals. They are BIOLOGICALLY similar.
Caucasians are white. The majority of modern day Iranians don’t live anywhere near the Caucasus mountains (they live in the Iranian plateau), but even if they did, how would that NOT make them white? Caucasian people are white. So white that Europeans originally thought that was where white people originated (Caucasian migration theory). What’s your point?
In 1812? In 1812 Italians were still considered white. It wasn’t until the waves of immigration in the late 1800s that they were reclassified as not being white. And once again the Brother’s Grimm got their inspiration from Friedrich Schulz, who got his inspiration from a 1600s French version, who got their inspiration from Petrosinella, which is from the 1460s.
Also to hit on this, yes and no. Persia is ultimately derived from an older endonym, Pārsa. It is true that Ēran was commonly used as an endonym by the period of Ferdowsi, however, common English historical parlance is to refer to pre-modern Iran as Persia, or the particular state it was known as at the time.
Fun fact the Aztecs were actually did not call themselves called the Aztecs. the word they used is mexica (meh-shee-ka), but when some historians were talking about their history in the early 1900s it became an issue because they’d be talking about the Mexican people, which is already a thing. The Aztecs said they came from a place called aztlan, which is where they got Aztec from.
Yeah, with the Aztecs it’s kinda complicated. Aztlan supposedly was like kinda an endonym? But not really a relevant one? It was tied to their mythological origins, so it’d kind of be like referring to Romans as Trojans (via Aeneas), except there’s reason to believe that the nobles titled themselves after Aztlan, so maybe when asked ‘who ruled these lands’, non Mexica tribes responded with essentially ‘the nobility’?
Another hypothesis is that Aztec broadly applied to all the tribes in that region and was a way of collectivizing them. Essentially like if we referred to ancient Sparta as ‘Greek’ and then ‘Greek’ came to be synonymous with specifically Spartans. (Unironically enough this would mean that modern Greece would be known as Sparta, if we’re using the Mexica-Aztec comparison).