Anonymous #2 11h

It’s not the words, it’s the effect they had on countless young people. - Influencing the sustaining of rampant social racism.

9

Anonymous #1 11h

Figure it out by Tuesday

15

Anonymous OP 11h

Such as?

5

Anonymous #2 8h

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859 https://thehilltoponline.com/2025/09/29/charlie-kirks-death-doesnt-erase-his-rhetoric/ Stop living in echo chambers, there’s a reason he only debated unprepared students. “Civil rights act was a mistake” - kirk “When I see a black pilot I get nervous” - kirk

4

Anonymous #2 8h

In a February 2024 Instagram post, Kirk referred to the "great replacement" conspiracy theory (which has been widely debunked), suggesting undocumented immigrants are coming to the U.S. to replace white Americans.

0

Anonymous #2 8h

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/great-replacement-theory-canada-1.6459699 https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/great-replacement-theory-white-replacement-theory

0

Anonymous OP 8h

The black pilot thing is bogus. His whole argument only made sense because he was arguing that black pilots are equally capable. He said that the policy created worries that he would have otherwise not had

0

Anonymous #2 8h

“Referred to” is crazy. You don’t even have to support it, all it takes is referring to it and he death? And idk what the conspiracy is, if one group is having less kids than others it will become a smaller part of the population. That’s not a conspiracy, it’s not some evil scheme it’s just how population works.

1

Anonymous #2 8h

So he lying about DEIA makes it ok to be uncomfortable with minorities working certain positions? Use your head champ, DEIA has always been way more about the A than D, and the people who benefited the most from it were Asian people. You are not as good a kirk defender as I had hoped.

1

Anonymous OP 8h

You can find videos of Kirk arguing there are NO biological differences between different races, he almost views them as a social construct. He cared the least about race among influencers on the right. Race was used as a justification afterwards to let people feel good that a podcast host they didn’t like got murdered

1

Anonymous #2 8h

The conspiracy is exactly what you said at the end. It’s clearly not a purposeful scheme, or covert invasion. But he portrayed that to millions of young morons!! Ones who would take everything he said on a whim!

1

Anonymous #2 8h

Do you not understand that the people who claim to “not see race,” tend to be the most racist? Being a racist but saying “Oh it’s not inherently tied to race” doesn’t absolve you of being a racist.

-1

Anonymous #2 8h

And not true, he was called racist his entire career by multiple mass entities and individuals. Dying won’t make me forget who he was when he lived.

0

Anonymous #2 8h

Kirk (good riddance) also hated Juneteenth because..? People like you think that ignoring everyone’s identity is the best you can do; how about you just try respecting people? Kirk was a terrible, evil human being who will burn in hell for eternity.

0

Anonymous OP 8h

I could argue you more on that but regardless, it’s insane if you think that makes him deserve being killed

4

Anonymous #2 8h

Nah I think he should’ve lived long enough to see the end of maga ngl; when I say he deserved worse I mean he deserved to watch his children grow up into people who study sociology, politics, and religion. He deserved to watch the young audience he garnered realize just how much damage he did. He deserved to suffer on this Earth long before entering hell.

-1

Anonymous OP 8h

Dude that’s not what your title implies at all.

3

Anonymous OP 6h

Those “unprepared students” can vote just the same as a “prepared statesman” can so why is it wrong to debate them and discuss ideas? If u think everyone should be allowed to vote then everyone should be open to debate ab the topics of which their vote matters

4

Anonymous OP 6h

Whether or not the immigrants r being sent as some sort of scheme to replace white Americans and Europeans it is happening. So it doesn’t matter if it’s part of some evil master plan or just by mere circumstance. It is happening and needs to be addressed

1

Anonymous #3 6h

Debate is not equal to the right to vote? Terrible equivalence 😭✌🏾. Moreover, it’s wrong to present the debates the way he did & ego farm while larping being intelligent. You ever seen the loser @ cambridge/Oxford? He got cooked so bad he almost cried. He was a loser in life & died like one.

-1

Anonymous #3 6h

Blatantly wrong & disproven on multiple occasions; you’re in an echo chamber.

1

Anonymous OP 6h

Bruh what? I’m saying if u have the right to vote on matters of the state then u should be able to debate the topics as an educated statesman. Everyone being allowed to vote is a democratic idea which is actually NOT what our founding fathers wanted. They wanted a representative republic which is where educated statesman who have a stake in the country (i.e. landowners who have an investment and interest in seeing the country succeed) can elect leaders who devote themselves to the country

4

Anonymous #3 6h

They were slavers who turned a colony into an empire, why would their opinions be at all compelling to me? Moreover once again, I just told you that the presentation of the debates was dishonest, as was his clipping strategy. Beyond this my point is as such: If he were a great debater why could he only win in a scenario in which he was more prepared than his opponent?

-1

Anonymous OP 6h

Also saying he died like a loser? Getting shot by a sniper in an assassination is not dying like a loser. That’s a very loser way and cowardly way to kill someone. And to say he deserved to die is outrageous. I don’t even agree with a large portion of his message but to say that he deserved to die is absolutely insane and says a lot more ab u than anything u could possibly try and say ab him

6

Anonymous #3 6h

I’ve explained this already; when I say he deserved worse I distinctly mean he deserved to live long enough to suffer losing everything he built. He deserved to watch his children grow up & go no contact. He deserved to suffer on this Earth (emotionally) as he will in hell.

2

Anonymous OP 6h

Why would their opinions be compelling to u? They only built the nation u live in today. Every bit of ur life is shaped bc of the things they did and the ideas they had. Also ur point makes no sense. If I go thru college and never study and get a 3.5 gpa but another guy studies his ass off and makes a 3.8 gpa and then we both apply for med school r they gonna want me with the 3.5 or the guy with the 3.8? U can’t blame someone bc they actually know their stuff and the other person doesn’t

2

Anonymous #3 6h

They didn’t “actually” build anything, their slaves did. Their organization, they’re strategic moves, all only accomplished through the destruction of cultures, and removal of humanity from their siblings in Christ, and you want me to be compelled by their musings of limiting voting? They were just slavers, who won a war. Nothing less, nothing more.

-1

Anonymous OP 6h

Wdym no contact? R u saying his children should be “cancelled” bc of their father’s who was murdered beliefs? Also wdym he’s in hell? He’s a Christian he’s in heaven. And if u say ur not a Christian and u don’t think Christian’s go to heaven but rather to hell where do u get the idea of hell from? The idea of hell comes from Christianity? U can’t have ur cake and eat it too

1

Anonymous #3 6h

Are you stupid? No contact as in I would hope they’d grow up and be disgusted with the words of their father until they go no contact?

1

Anonymous #3 6h

“It is not faith alone” Dude he split hell open when he got shot.

1

Anonymous #3 6h

Also no the idea of hell does not come from Christianity, Hinduism literally described multiple hells thousands of years before the birth of christ, idiot.

1

Anonymous OP 6h

Their slaves formed the constitution? Also this argument is just stupid saying slaves built America. As if every white person was extremely wealthy and had slaves. Not like there were any white ppl who had jobs other than owning or beating slaves. What a joke. Also if a house is built u say the architect built it. Not the 16 year olds and Mexicans who go out there and put together the materials based on the blueprint the architect designed

2

Anonymous #3 6h

Also this stuff about gpa’s makes 0 sense. I’m just telling you that if he were actually GOOD at debating, he would have participated in way more debates with people who had the same preparedness as him. That does in fact include students, I actually mentioned 2 schools where he embarrassed himself by name.

0

Anonymous #3 6h

No, slaves literally built the infrastructure of the nation, roads, hospitals, cemeteries, schools, etc. Also while every white person was not rich due to slavery, the American south pre civil war was one of the most profitable places on Earth, exclusively because of slavery. You do realize that right?

-1

Anonymous #3 6h

Uhhh? Only people who’ve never worked in construction would say this. In truth the architect is a designer, not a builder.

-1

Anonymous OP 6h

Why would u hope that a family is split apart? That is some messed up stuff and again says a lot more ab u than anyone else

1

Anonymous OP 6h

Hell is the complete absence of God

1

Anonymous #3 6h

I don’t want any daughter to feel like she HAS to stay in contact with a father who said he would force her to have a child if she were raped and got pregnant. Nor would I want his son to feel like he HAS to be in contact with someone who distinctly hates minorities.

1

Anonymous #3 6h

Are you dumb enough to think no other religion had a depiction of hell before Christians? That’s the Christian definition sure, but what does that have to do with Hindu scholars describing hell thousands of years before Jesus was born?

1

Anonymous OP 6h

I’m not even a huge Charlie Kirk fan dude. He was kinda liberal on a number of things. I’m not saying he never lost a debate. I’m just saying lack of preparation is not an excuse for losing in anything, debate having no exception either

1

Anonymous OP 6h

U do realize Christianity doesn’t start with Jesus. Christianity is the whole story of humanity. It starts in the Garden, u have Noah and the flood, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, all the prophets, David, Solomon, all these ppl Esther, Jeremiah all these ppl before Jesus. U obviously don’t know very much at all ab Christianity if u think it starts with the birth of Jesus or even the immaculate conception. It begins before creation. And it never ends. It is forever. Beyond comprehension. A mystery

1

Anonymous #3 6h

If you think kirk was a liberal you’re probably an unknowing nazi. No response about what I js said about hell. No response on kirk saying he would force his daughter to have a child. No response to what I said about minorities & infrastructure. Truly pathetic

0

Anonymous #3 6h

Yeah you’re not very smart; first of all, a lot of the figures you mentioned are judaeo-Christian figures. Moreover we have hindu text that predate Judaism as well. You do realize Christianity is nowhere near the oldest religion right?

1

Anonymous OP 6h

I responded to the hell thing. Calling someone a Nazi isn’t an argument. It’s pathetic and means nothing. Also the words “I will force my daughter to have a child” never came out of his mouth. U might be talking ab him saying he wouldn’t want her to have an abortion? Completely different topic and u know just as well as I do ur twisting his words by saying that. Also what did u even say ab minorities and infrastructure? Either ur making that up or i did not see it

1

Anonymous #3 6h

The only reason someone would agree with something like this is being a Christian; if you can only win an argument due to a similarity in religion then you’ve lost.

1

Anonymous #3 6h

He said “The child would be brought to term” in response to a question from a woman that directly asked “In the event of rape & pregnancy would you force your daughter to carry that baby”

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I didn’t call you a nazi, I made an if than statement. Please keep up. I’m not making anything up; I told you about how minorities literally were the only reason the south was a profitable region, and mentioned their literal construction of infrastructure that would be expanded into what we recognize as home today.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

U do realize that Judaism before Christ is the same religion as Christianity. Christ fulfills the law and the prophecies of the Messiah. He is the lamb spoken of by the prophets. Modern Judaism is a completely different religion. Looking beyond the literal name and actually studying it will show u that. Also idk what ur using to date that with? Christianity or ancient Judaism whatever ur wanting to refer to it as literally tells of how God created the world. So no obviously it’s the oldest

1

Anonymous #3 5h

We have scientific evidence and historical evidence of religions that predate both Judaism & Christianity. Literally every religion has a creation story, does that make them the oldest? Or is Christianity the oldest just because it’s your faith? You’re terrible at this dude😭😭

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I said he was liberal on some things. U said if u think that ur a Nazi. So u called me a Nazi. Have the balls to stand up to what u say and not try to weasel ur way out of it. U never once said anything ab the south to me. I didn’t read all ur comments to other ppl so maybe ur getting confused with someone else. If ur saying slavery is the only reason the south was able to do things at a certain point in time I would just point u to literally almost every other civilization ever that’susedslaves

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Nope, said “you’re probably an unknowing” which is radically different from saying if you believe x you are y. Like I’ve been saying please keep up. I’ll respond to my comment about the south so you can see it. Also dude I don’t have a problem calling you a nazi I’m just waiting for you to confirm it. You absolutely seem like one to me.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

^

0

Anonymous OP 5h

^

-1

Anonymous #3 5h

Screenshot of comment in case it’s hard to find. Screenshot also shows me replying to it.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I can explain to u why Christianity is true and all other religions r false. Also Christianity again has existed since the creation. God has existed forever. Just bc u don’t believe it doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

He said he would want his grandchild to be born? Ur against that?

1

Anonymous #3 5h

This is literally just confirmation bias dude. You think it’s the oldest because it has to be in order for you to maintain your faith. What’d you think the Mandaens would say about your idiocy? They’re a demographic of judaeo-Abrahamic people who view John The Baptist as the true prophet. They’re mentioned in the bible, and Quran. Objectively, they’re faith is older than any Christian church. You could’ve just said “My faith claims to be the oldest therefore I believe it.”

1

Anonymous OP 5h

U did not say that🤣. What do u even think a Nazi is since u think u know so much

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I’m against a man snickering and smiling at the thought of forcing his daughter to carry a baby to term. Also no he did not, I was using accurate quotes.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Yes I did, can you read? Nazism is a cruel, 20th-century political system led by Adolf Hitler in Germany. It taught that white people, specifically Germanic people called "Aryans," were better than all other people. It used total government control, violence, and heavy hate against Jewish people and others to rule. And no, they weren’t socialist just because it was part of the name. The same way China isn’t a people’s republic just because it’s part of the name. You’re embarrassing yourself atp

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I did not see that. There’s like a million different comments all in different places idk why they’re not all just in the order they’ve been typed out in. Dude im from the South. If u think that there aren’t white ppl who r dirt poor and were treated just as bad if not worse than slaves then ur completely wrong. Slaves were more expensive than cars are today in terms of how much money was worth back then (inflation in simple terms). And again architect v. Mexican and 16 y/o argument

1

Anonymous #3 5h

You’re an idiot. The whole reason people who were dirt poor and could never dream of even owning land let alone a slave fought to maintain slavery was because of the racial caste. The only thing that separated the poor being the same as literal property was the law that said you had to be w certain color to be a slave. Also indentured servitude was not slavery and was nowhere near as bad. You being from the south doesn’t make you educated on its history. - Phenix Alabama

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Calling something cruel when describing what kind of ideology it is and form of government it is does not say anything. And based off the rest of ur answer ur using straight chat gpt and propaganda to answer. National socialism is the belief that a nation should work for its ppl. Work and bread. Ppl should have the right to work and the right to eat. The Jews declared war against Germany first in 1933. Look it up. Quit using emotion and use logic

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I’m a poli sci student, I just know this subject better than you. The one who’s taking forever to reply & (probably) googling everything is you not me. Also no, they literally did not. Boycotting is not the same as declaring war? How dumb are you?

0

Anonymous #3 5h

Also that’s not what nazism is according to anyone except a nazi; finally got the confirmation.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1933_anti-Nazi_boycott https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/political-science/great-replacement-theory-white-replacement-theory The nonsense you’re spouting? Well documented conspiracies of which we can trace the origin. Is China a people’s republic?

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I’m from Montgomery not Phenix city. And i know ppl from Phenix city and no one just calls it Phenix so if ur trying to say ur from there nice try🤣. Also yeah obviously the wealthy s tried to divide the poor blacks and the poor whites. It’s a wealthy vs poor issue not a white vs black issue. U do realize there were black slave owners in the south too right? Who were often known by the white slave owners as being extremely cruel towards their chattle. Learn ur history not jsut the propaganda

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Bold of you to say quit using emotion & use logic when you can’t admit that there are religions older than Christianity

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I mentioned phenix because it’s where I’m typing this from, keep up. Also the whole black slave owner thing is another myth. Most of what you believe is just propaganda organized around creating a constant surplus of people who deny that racism was a purposeful evil committed by our nation (and many others) for centuries. Igu w sources though dw

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Bro im not copying and pasting ur links. Just tell me in ur own words or put it in a quote if u want me to hear it. Ur citing Wikipedia too?🤣 Anyone can write on Wikipedia. I couldn’t use Wikipedia as a source on a lower school project🤣 Also just calling soemthinf a conspiracy theory does not debunk it or make it untrue. Anyone can name call anything. If it’s so obviously fake show some real history to disprove it. Do u think the Jews did not declare war on Germany in 1933?

1

Anonymous #3 5h

By 1830, there were 3,775 black (including mixed) slaveholders in the South who owned a total of 12,760 slaves; the Southern slave population at the time was around 2.3 million people. 80% of the black slaveholders were located in Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland. The vast majority of these were not purchased but were inherited. When a slave master expected his life to end with no heir he often appointed a key house slave as a posthumous advisor of his wealth, including slaves.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Why would I care where ur typing from? I could be in Australia rn it doesn’t mean im from there or know much of anythifn ab there. Bro saying there were no black slave owners is absurd. That’s literally just not true🤣u cant just call everything that disagrees with ur point a myth or conspiracy🤣u do realize that slavery existed everywhere. Not just to black ppl. Stop complaining ab it. The word slave comes from slav. Which is Eastern European (white ppl). Stop being a victim ab everything

2

Anonymous #3 5h

You’re nowhere near as good at this as you think. This is the origin of that conspiracy. The “war” they’re describing is a boycott against nazism. You’re scared to read my sources because you’re at least semi aware of the cognitive dissonance you’re expressing.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

So what r u proving my point now?🤣🤣

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I literally didn’t even say that? I said that’s a myth, as in the idea of black people attending slave auctions the same way white people did is generally a myth. In some extremely rare cases (like the establishment of Liberia) that did however occur. Even so that didn’t happen via the south? I literally gave you the number of black slave owners then described the avg scenario in which that occurred.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

No you idiot? Just because some dickhead in britain said “judea declares war” doesn’t mean that at all happened. First of all the Jewish people never had a government within Germany that could declare war, secondly you can literally see in the screenshot I gave you that they’re talking about a BOYCOTT. I’m starting to doubt you’re reading what I’m saying at all.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Posts a newspaper clip from the time of the event we r talking ab. Says exactly what I say it says. Says im spreading a conspiracy by saying it says exactly what it says. R we serious dude🤣Yes it was a boycott. But the international Jewish congress called it a war. The Jewish press in America called it a war. There was no Jewish state with a Jewish military at the time so no obviously it was not like they were rolling in tanks. It was still called a war tho by the very perpetrators of it

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Read my other comment on this

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Are you stupid? This newspaper isn’t from the international congress? Also no a boycott is NOT and was NOT a formal or recognized informal declaration of war even in the 1930’s. You just do not know what you’re talking about do you?

1

Anonymous #3 5h

This sensationalist headline, published by the Daily Express on March 24, 1933, misrepresents reality when stripped of its historical context. By then, Hitler had already come to power and the Nazi regime had begun persecuting Jews—through boycotts, purges, arrests, and attacks on Jewish citizens and businesses. Literally this paper was out AFTER Jewish people were being hunted down 😭😭😭😭😭 you’re so dumb bro

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Show me any source from the international Jewish congress calling the boycott a war.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Bro. No one literally refers to it as a war as in they were entering into military conflict. Ever heard of a trade “war” and no the newspaper was not from the congress. If the paper writes ab something I say and then u try and say well the newspaper wasn’t his actual newspaper ur point would be invalid. They’re writing ab what happened. How thick r u?

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Once again moron! You said declared war!! A declaration of war has a specific definition, it doesn’t just change to refer to whatever you want just because you don’t know the details. Your dumbass also thought that newspaper was released by the International Jewish Congress 😭✌🏾actual idiot bro. You are in multiple comments claiming Jewish people called it a war, and they just did not do that🤦🏽‍♂️

1

Anonymous OP 5h

The paper clipping literally states Jews of the world unite in action. R u dumb

1

Anonymous #3 5h

What does that have to do with who published it?????? That’s literally a subtitle holy christ you’re an idiot. You can literally google who published this paper if you think I’m lying. It’s readily available information

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I said the actions of the Jews and the international Jewish congress were named as a war by a British press. The British were not exactly fans of Germany or uncle H either and were actually quite friendly towards the Jewish ppl so if anythifn they would have been writing with a slant in favor of the Jews. I never said the congress released the term. It was a name given based off the actions of jews

1

Anonymous #3 5h

It quite literally says “Daily Express” at the very top of it, which was a BRITISH press. You’re claiming Jewish people declared war, and wrote this paper because you’re a holocaust denier or apologist, not sure which yet.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Bc ur saying i said the congress released the paper. I did not.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

That is quite literally not what you said and yk damn well I’ll put the screenshots in here. You claimed the Jewish International Congress published this paper, and that Jewish people “declared war first.” By the time of this paper’s publishing hitler was ALREADY oppressing them 🤦🏽‍♂️ literally everything you claimed was wrong or dishonest.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I said they declared war via their boycott just like the ppl at the time saw it and wrote ab it. I never said they wrote the paper

0

Anonymous #3 5h

Yeah you adjusted to that claim after I explained how stupid it was to believe a demographic with no government or recognized state equivalent organization could declare war. Yes. You. Did.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I never said they published the paper. They did declare war via boycott in 1933. The holocaust didn’t start til the war started when Germany determined that enemies of the state should be imprisoned during a time of war. Jews weren’t the only ppl put in camps.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

What country between 1933-2026 recognizes a boycott as a declaration of war? A population without representation cannot (by definition bro) declare war.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

I said the jewish press in America. Not the British press from which u r directly citing.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

Also it’s hilarious you say that given that hitler’s first Jew organized action was a boycott. April 1, 1933, followed immediately in April by additional laws restricting Jewish students in schools and limiting Jewish professionals in medicine and law.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

First of all u saying history is confined to 1933 to the present just shows ur lack of understanding of the whole of human history. Also what. Literally the United States? No representation in British parliament. Boycotted and declared war. But then again it doesn’t meet ur criteria of since 1933 so ig that might be out the window right

1

Anonymous #3 5h

So show me Jewish press in America claiming that Jewish people have no gone to war with the state of Germany. The boycott itself was not first, nor is a boycott (legally) an act of war. Nor can (legally) an entire population without centralized government or representatives declare war on a nation state.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

I’m using 1933-2026 as a base range. Do you seriously need more than almost a 100 year range for 1 example?

1

Anonymous OP 5h

Yeah bc he was looking out for Germans over Jews bc he was the leader of Germany. In what world is a leader looking out for his nation’s ppl over that of foreigners wrong?

1

Anonymous OP 5h

No im just pointing out that throwing out all of human history except for the last less than 100 years is stupid. Still no response to it tho which is pathetic

1

Anonymous #3 5h

You’re acting like Jews couldn’t be citizens of Germany, that’s false. You’re also acting as though being Jewish inherently stops someone from participating in German culture (it can but does not have to). Simple search btw.

1

Anonymous #3 5h

The previous 100 years are the easiest time to analyze, and have the most similar international legal systems that we do today. Maybe forever ago a boycott started a war between Carthage & some other city state. But to act like that information would be relevant to us today would be dishonest.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

German and European culture is Christian. So no Jews can not fit in to that. Also they made it to where Jews could not be citizens so no they weren’t citizens🤣

1

Anonymous #3 5h

See there it is! That’s emotion not logic; we have Hindu, Atheist, Jewish, Christian, Muslim & more in America. Why couldn’t Germany🤔I think you’re just trying to validate your own nonsense. They were legally citizens, they were recognized by the German state as citizens.

1

Anonymous OP 5h

How is analyzing history dishonest? Wouldn’t our most recent history be the most likely history to be dishonest with ppl still alive today to spread lies ab it to achieve whatever goals they have? If u don’t think ppl lie ab history to make things how they best treat them then ur dead wrong. History is written by the victors. The Jews were the only ppl to have come out on top of WW2. They r the only group that is truly better off today

1

Anonymous #3 4h

This is something you’d only wonder if you had no clue how to judge the validity of a source, which is how you end a holocaust apologist so fair enough! Also Jewish people didn’t lose their citizenship until 1935. You need to start engaging with accurate sources. And no, today is NOT harder to study than ancient history. I think you were js never taught how to tell validity of source.

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Jews were not recognized by the German state under Hitler as citizens after 1935. So they weren’t citizens and were not treated as such rightfully so. And America, tho a nation founded and rooted in Christianity is far different from Germany. Germany is the nation that descends from the Holy Roman Empire. A state where the original monarch was hand picked by the pope. It is deeply rooted I Christianity. Martin Luther was German. All these things with Christianity.

1

Anonymous #3 4h

That’s also objectively false, the American economy exploded, the swiss economy exploded! Are you not at all familiar with the bretton woods conference? Without WWII we would’ve never establish modern international trade.

1

Anonymous #3 4h

So you do realize that would mean Jewish people actually spent longer as citizens than they spent as non citizens right? Dude you’re an actual joke 😭😭

1

Anonymous OP 4h

I literally said 1935 before u. And I didn’t need to use google 🤣🤣 come on bro ur trying so hard but it’s just not working. And maybe for u history is hard. Also history of the modern era is not ancient. The Holy Roman Empire is not ancient history. It’s old but not ancient

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Wtv screenshot u put isn’t showing up on my end. Bro what? What r u talking ab. The German state under uncle H was from 1933-1945 1933-1935 would be less time than 1935-1945

1

Anonymous #3 4h

You’re an idiot. The Jewish people gained citizenship at the start of the 19th century, that is ~1801 🤦🏽‍♂️ hence they were citizens for literally 100 years before hitler even existed. The screenshot is of me looking up “When did 19th century start” since Ik your dumbass doesn’t know how centuries work.

1

Anonymous OP 4h

So 1801-1935 and 1945- present is more than the entirety of the rest of all of Germanic history? Ur still wrong🤣🤣and yes I know how centuries work but thank u for that🤣

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Are you stupid? Jewish citizenship was returned in 1949. You don’t even know the history of the conflict & you’re trying to lecture me? That’s that southern education system for you.

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Well yeah there wasn’t a German state again until 1949. So ig u could say technically there were no German citizens in those 4 years but it makes no sense to say so. But good job with the name calling again. I forgot all southerners were idiots even tho u urself said the south was one of the most economically prosperous places on Earth

1

Anonymous #3 4h

I said it was only profitable because of slavery; and since you like to pretend to read history & stats I’ll give you some. Since the end of the civil war, the south has been on a vast and fast cultural decline, the south ranks worst for education, worst for economic mobility for in staters (people who’re born in & stay in the same state) and is the worst by far for literacy. Literally the only time the south has been successful or a powerhouse was during slavery.

1

Anonymous #3 4h

I’m not going to beat myself up about name calling a nazi sympathizer lol

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Yeah for every person. Not for those of us who come from background. We lost the war bro we don’t get to help those ppl out🤣 it’s yalls yankee government that keeps them down. We tried to make our own government to help them out and yall came and killed a bunch of them and burned town a bunch of our cities and universities. And yall only won bc yall had way more ppl. If both sides had the same amount of ppl then we would’ve won easily. Also we could’ve burned DC to the ground but didn’t🤣

1

Anonymous #3 4h

I said Jewish people have been citizens longer than they haven’t; Jewish migration into Germany wasn’t even fully a country until 1871. Dude you are nowhere near as knowledgeable about this as you thought and it’s genuinely getting sad. Like it definitely WAS funny, but I kinda don’t want to be responsible for shattering your world view

1

Anonymous #3 4h

“You only won because you were better!” And that’s not true at all, the civil war was exclusively about slavery entirely. You lost because your army didn’t do what they needed to win, and you’ve been sore losers for 200 years. The south was ONLY ever a profitable region because of tycoon power and slave labor.

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Bro ur not shattering anything🤣🤣u state 1871 to disprove what im saying but u used 1801 to prove ur own point. U can’t have ur cake and eat it too. Also u can still talk ab Germanic history before 1871. The German ppl were still a thing before 1871. Ur actually as thick as it gets🤣🤣

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Larger quantity does not mean greater quality. All the best generals were southern everyone knows that. Robert MF E Lee💪 Nathan Bedford that MF Forest💪 (my direct relative btw) Stonewall Jackson💪to say the war of northern aggression was ab slavery exclusively is just straight up ignorant🤣we didn’t burn down DC bc we didn’t want to conquer we just wanted independence. Yall didn’t care how many of ur own ppl died u just wanted to kill more Americans

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Then prove it

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Your motivation for independence was spawned from what? Moron

1

Anonymous OP 4h

From the north leeching off of the south. Yall needed us a lot more than we needed yall. Southern cotton was king. Northerners were trying to exert control over southerners since the foundation of our country

1

Anonymous #3 4h

I asked you for proof not opinions, wanna see how easy it is to find proof?

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Not an opinion. U obviously don’t know anythifn ab American history. Why do u think we have a house of reps and a senate?

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Yo you’re a fucking idiot dog the United States Senate existed long before the Civil War. It was established by the U.S. Constitution and first met on March 4, 1789. During the decades leading up to the Civil War, the pre-war Senate played a central role in fierce national debates over slavery and westward expansion.

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Yeah. Even ur own screenshot proves my point. This was building up long before the civil war. It didn’t happen over night. There were conflicts since even before the civil war. Learn ur history bro. And don’t just read buzz words. Actually read the texts with context and cross examine 👍🏼

0

Anonymous #3 4h

They literally say slavery is the cause of the war. You’re not even fully convinced of what you’re saying atp & it’s obvious. “With reference to African Slavery”

1

Anonymous #3 4h

“They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of the Republic.” - This is Georgia claiming taking away slavery essentially kills the state btw

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Let’s talk ab my home sweet home Alabama since that’s where my loyalty to the confederacy would come from. Not Georgia (bunch of barkers and criminals) and certainly not Mississippi (all the trees in Alabama lean to the west bc Mississippi sucks). The heart of Dixie and the OG capital (my home sweet home Montgomery) seceded bc of a lot more issues than slavery. Nice try tho

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Texas takes it a step further & claims that as a state they MUST protect the institution of slavery in order to exist as Texas

1

Anonymous OP 4h

I’m from Alabama bro. Read my other comment

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Again. From Alabama dude

1

Anonymous OP 4h

Texas ain’t even the south

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Yeah you do realize these were already being sent before you replied right? Also yk not every state has one of these right? Alabama for example does not (literacy problems since day 1 is crazy)

1

Anonymous #3 4h

Texas absolutely is the south & is genuinely the only confederate state that could’ve been its own country.

1

Anonymous OP 3h

A. It’s not the south. Anyone from the south would tell u Texas isn’t the south. Hell ppl from Texas would tell u Texas isn’t the south it’s Texas it’s its own thing. B. It literally was its own country at one point wdym🤣why do u think it’s called the lone star state 🤣

1

Anonymous #3 3h

No response to this tho…sorry if I shattered ur propagandized version of history🤣

1

Anonymous #3 3h

I’m still trying to read the tiny text, also yk that’s not at all the same as what I showed you right? Dude I am genuinely worried about you & your ability to comprehend things

1

Anonymous #3 3h

And also cap! If you read the FULL constitution and not just the snippet you people like to lie about, you’ll quickly find this. If you want direct quotes I can give them to you.

1

Anonymous OP 2h

^

1

Anonymous OP 2h

^

1

Anonymous OP 1h

So point A) all of screenshots have come from the same website. Usually ur supposed to use multiple sources for credibility. B) ur thing literally states that the constitution was never ratified by the voters. Am I to be upset with the United States government or any other government over proposed legislation?

1

Anonymous #3 1h

Not the same website because the site I used doesn’t list Alabama; Alabama had a constitution not a reason of secession.

1

Anonymous OP 1h

An unratified constitution? So just a proposal is what ur mad ab?

1

Anonymous #3 1h

This is an exaggerated diagram motivated by pseudoscience but humor me for a second. If this were true, what exactly are we supposed to do with that information?

1