Anonymous OP 5w

Dude the fact yours is higher than hers means this all doesn’t even matter. Do you like her as a person ?

92

Anonymous #1 5w

Yeah she’s extremely cool. I fw her alot.

36

Anonymous OP 5w

Then y’all are good.

42

Anonymous OP 4w

I don’t think that’s bad but I feel like I should share that a girl I used to hookup with told me her body count was 22 and then right before new years she reposted a reel on her close friends ig story that said something along the lines of “new year means body count resets” so do with that information what you will

-1

Anonymous #6 4w

That’s one person being stupid.

1

Anonymous #6 4w

Also for the record I care way more about someone being healthy and clean than their body count

6

Anonymous #4 4w

Yeah I am what’s wrong with it?

3

Anonymous #7 4w

If you’re seriously asking me this, you’ve gotta grow up

3

Anonymous #8 4w

Yeah, genuinely, I agree with this. I don’t know why it’s such a common thing for people to want their partners to be super good at sex but have a low amount of bodies. Yeah you can learn a lot with even just one person but those skills won’t transfer to every single person you have sex with

1

Anonymous #4 4w

You’re the one who can’t even cite a reason as to why it’s supposedly bad

1

Anonymous #7 4w

Okay, you tell me why it’s good then.

-1

Anonymous #4 4w

It’s morally neutral, it’s not good or bad it’s just a choice

1

Anonymous #4 4w

It’s not a position, it’s a property of people that exists in the real world. Thats like saying y’all are justifying gravity or people with blue eyes like im sorry reality is disappointing ig?

2

Anonymous #7 4w

Being promiscuous is definitely not MORALLY neutral. You can try to justify it any way you want but MORALLY, we both know it’s not neutral. Let’s not lie to ourselves.

-1

Anonymous #8 4w

Sexual promiscuity is not something that people naturally possess. It’s a choice. It’s not comparable to gravity or people with blue eyes.

-1

Anonymous #4 4w

False. 1. Sexual promiscuity is something that people naturally possess. This fact can be explained very simply evolutionarily. If you are an animal which does not pair bond (humans have notable sexual dimorphism, competitive tendencies). It should also be mentioned strictly monogamous animals do not typically engage in adultery to the degree that animals like humans do. All of this is to say that humans not being a strict pair bonding species is a scientific fact.

2

Anonymous #8 4w

If human males could get a mutation to produce more sperm, faster they can mate more meaning that mutation gets spread more in the nonmonogamous animals AND underlying genetics influencing sexual promiscuity obviously encourage more mating and more genes being spread. It’s a very simple evolutionary mechanism.

2

Anonymous #4 4w

2. “ITS A CHOICE” Can you even actually demonstrate there is free will to begin with? What I would say, is you can cause flies, mice, monkeys and a wide and vast variety of animals to engage in mating behavior by altering their environment and stimulus provided. Humans are among the animal, and like all animals, they often responds to that stimulus. I’m not sure endocrinology nor neurobiology would confirm your claims of it absolutely being a choice.

2

Anonymous #4 4w

3. It’s not comparable to gravity or people with blue eyes. Both of gravity and blue eyes notably exist in external reality regardless of your opinion on it. So does sexual promiscuity and sadness.

1

Anonymous #4 4w

You’re still failing to articulate why it’s bad, you keep just saying “come on we both know” but no dawg I do not

5