Anonymous #3 18w

But I am

41

Anonymous #3 18w

Yk photoshop exists right

27

Anonymous OP 18w

but this isn’t photoshop

6

Comment Deleted

0

They don’t everyone is just assuming that things are AI now cause they are scared for whatever reason 😂

6

Comment Deleted

0

Typing in a prompt isn’t “creating art”

3

Comment Deleted

0

Yes

5

Instantly recognizable and had a clear cultural impact

1

Comment Deleted

0

Art must be a result of human creativity

6

Anonymous hovercraft 18w

There must be an artist to create art.

4

Comment Deleted

0

If I commission someone to paint me a picture according to a set of specifications, who is the artist?

4

Comment Deleted

0

That is not a more apt question at all. The answer is very simple the person who creates the art is the artist. Here’s another question. If I use a prompt on a primitive ai model and it gives me a shitty picture am I a shitty artist? Like wise if I use an advanced model and it gives me a complex picture am I a good artist? Doesn’t make much sense does it

3

Neither. There’s no art. Don’t be dumb.

4

Comment Deleted

0

Ai art has no soul, art without soul is not art

10

Comment Deleted

0

lol of course it is. A toddler is a human using a medium to create. This disproves nothing I’ve said. Also my argument has nothing to do with metaphysics.

3

So you actually think you can be a good or bad artist depending on what ai model you choose? This has to be ragebait at this point

3

Comment Deleted

0

Art has to be intentional

2

Comment Deleted

0

Again, there has to be a human involved in the creation. Not just the prompt

3

Comment Deleted

0

Again, that begs my question about commissioning a piece of art from an artist. Describing what you want him to paint doesn’t make you the artist.

2