Anonymous #4 5w

No the AI you used made it worse

1

Anonymous #5 5w

How did it?

1

Anonymous #4 5w

1, it was done by an AI, 2, you could’ve done it yourself very quickly, 3, it was perfectly beautiful before

6

Anonymous #5 5w

But that doesn’t say it made it worse. You realize AI is trained on things, right? As in, it’s trained on beautiful nature photography and what precisely to do. The fact you can’t even define what makes it worse than before, simply tells me you have no idea what you’re talking about, and that it worked well.

0

Anonymous #4 5w

Mk sure let’s go then. Photography is a form of art, something AI inherently cannot do as art is a form of human expression. When you use AI to edit photos, even if it might make that photo more visually appealing through color correction and glare reduction etc, you’re fundamentally undermining what that art is supposed to be. Real photography and image editing takes skill work, and creativity, things that you don’t need to askan AI to enhance an image. It’s not about how it actually looks (1/2

5

Anonymous #5 5w

(2/2) it’s that you used it to alter a beautiful image that a person saw and thought was beautiful. AI has no concept of beauty or art outside of what we tell it, so it has no place in it.

2

Anonymous #5 5w

Art is subjective dude, it is literally creating art. It’s not innovating, but it’s literally art

-2

Anonymous #4 5w

Ai literally isn’t art

2

Anonymous OP 5w

It’s fake shit based of real art made by people ✌️🤷

2

Anonymous #4 5w

It’s also just didn’t need fixing

1

Anonymous OP 5w

If a human and an AI made the same exact image, what’s the difference?

-1

Anonymous OP 5w

Then why does it look better lol

-1

Anonymous OP 5w

Goated OP, respect

1

Anonymous #4 5w

The AI didn’t put any effort or creativity into it. Watching AI make music that’s entirely based off of the creativity and effort of others is horrible to see when it took me a lot of hard work, love, and passion to do the same. AI doesn’t actually create anything, it steals from what it knows.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

Define art

1

Anonymous #5 5w

None of that means it isn’t art, it is absolutely creating art; it’s just not being innovative

0

Anonymous #4 5w

It’s literally stealing and hodgepodging shit together without permission of the original creators. Not only is that not fucking creating but it’s also intellectual theft

5

Anonymous #4 5w

It don’t mine looks more real, like an actual experience. Because it is 🥰

1

Anonymous OP 5w

What if I told you I edited it myself, and only put the watermark to make it look like AI did it? Then you would call it art lol. It’s the same image!

0

Anonymous #4 5w

But why would you do that? You should be proud of the art you make, and some art isn’t ment to be altered, but studied and recreated. No art is supposed to be the same.

1

Anonymous #4 5w

You’re not getting it. The way it looks isn’t the damn problem, the problem is YOU, yes YOU, the human being, didn’t actually do anything.

6