Anonymous #4 12w

No the AI you used made it worse

1

Anonymous #5 12w

How did it?

1

Anonymous #4 12w

1, it was done by an AI, 2, you could’ve done it yourself very quickly, 3, it was perfectly beautiful before

6

Anonymous #5 12w

But that doesn’t say it made it worse. You realize AI is trained on things, right? As in, it’s trained on beautiful nature photography and what precisely to do. The fact you can’t even define what makes it worse than before, simply tells me you have no idea what you’re talking about, and that it worked well.

0

Anonymous #4 12w

Mk sure let’s go then. Photography is a form of art, something AI inherently cannot do as art is a form of human expression. When you use AI to edit photos, even if it might make that photo more visually appealing through color correction and glare reduction etc, you’re fundamentally undermining what that art is supposed to be. Real photography and image editing takes skill work, and creativity, things that you don’t need to askan AI to enhance an image. It’s not about how it actually looks (1/2

5

Anonymous #5 12w

(2/2) it’s that you used it to alter a beautiful image that a person saw and thought was beautiful. AI has no concept of beauty or art outside of what we tell it, so it has no place in it.

2

Anonymous #5 12w

Art is subjective dude, it is literally creating art. It’s not innovating, but it’s literally art

-2

Anonymous #4 12w

Ai literally isn’t art

2

Anonymous OP 12w

It’s fake shit based of real art made by people ✌️🤷

2

Anonymous #4 12w

It’s also just didn’t need fixing

1

Anonymous OP 12w

If a human and an AI made the same exact image, what’s the difference?

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

Then why does it look better lol

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

Goated OP, respect

1

Anonymous #4 12w

The AI didn’t put any effort or creativity into it. Watching AI make music that’s entirely based off of the creativity and effort of others is horrible to see when it took me a lot of hard work, love, and passion to do the same. AI doesn’t actually create anything, it steals from what it knows.

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Define art

1

Anonymous #5 12w

None of that means it isn’t art, it is absolutely creating art; it’s just not being innovative

0

Anonymous #4 12w

It’s literally stealing and hodgepodging shit together without permission of the original creators. Not only is that not fucking creating but it’s also intellectual theft

5

Anonymous #4 12w

It don’t mine looks more real, like an actual experience. Because it is 🥰

1

Anonymous OP 12w

What if I told you I edited it myself, and only put the watermark to make it look like AI did it? Then you would call it art lol. It’s the same image!

0

Anonymous #4 12w

But why would you do that? You should be proud of the art you make, and some art isn’t ment to be altered, but studied and recreated. No art is supposed to be the same.

1

Anonymous #4 12w

You’re not getting it. The way it looks isn’t the damn problem, the problem is YOU, yes YOU, the human being, didn’t actually do anything.

6