Comment Deleted

0

The red ovalish shape is supposed to be a dong in the ahh while the blue ovalish shape is supposed to be a dong in the vajayjay

83

Comment Deleted

0

Very fun I’m sure

8

tree w fruit above a lil cave w berry bushes imo. or a dong destroying some butthole

6

Anonymous #4 11w

If they knew I’m sure they wouldn’t have. Unfortunately ai is getting harder to spot, and people are usually scrolling through and upvoting without really searching for it. That’s not really on them, it’s more a problem with the person who posted this shit

12

Anonymous #5 11w

If they can’t tell the difference, that means they secretly like AI slop and they shouldn’t be bitching and whining about in the first place.

-8

Anonymous #4 11w

The problem isn't the quality, though the quality is often poor. It's about the morality of it. Ai image generation (in its current state) being used for day to day, non important tasks like memes is detrimental to our planet. It's not about liking the content of the meme, it's about what went into making it

21

Anonymous #5 11w

It has absolutely nothing to do with morality. People who bitch and whine about AI fail their own supposed“morals” by choice every day, engaging in a variety of environmentally destructive behaviors. In reality they’re just luddites being luddites. They hate new tech because it’s who they are.

-6

Anonymous #5 11w

The good news is that luddites always lose. Always. They couldn’t stop fire. They couldn’t stop the wheel. They couldn’t stop the internet and they certainly can’t stop AI.

-5

Anonymous #4 11w

Dude who hurt you

16

Anonymous #4 11w

Bro look up the word luddite

2

Anonymous #6 11w

I’m sorry, what about my comment screams “luddite” to you? I acknowledge its usefulness for important tasks, even in its current state. Imply that it could be used for day to day, non important tasks in a future state. I directly tell you the issue is the environment factor/what went into making the image

2

Anonymous #5 11w

Sorry I meant to reply to 4, I’m not sure why it replied to you, 6.

2