
wtf r these replies. Dude started with noticeable definition. First photo taken unflexed, shitty angle, shitty lighting. Second photo taken with pump, fair amount of muscle built but not unbelievable, and great lighting + angling. Yall tweakin this is 100% doable with a solid routine and good enough genetics, your insecurities are clouding your judgment.
It's not insecurities, it is intentionally deceptive like you just explained. I myself didn't even realize all the things you just said. You're right, there may not be as huge of a difference between the two photos as it seems. Lighting makes all the difference. I'm gonna post a picture to demonstrate
> he's not trying to mislead anyone Idk man. As someone who posts pictures and intentionally tries to get the best lighting, you become very aware of how your body looks with and without good lighting. The difference is stark. If your theory is right, this was 100% on purpose, and bro is trying to exaggerate his progress. If he wanted an honest comparison, he could've used a pic from 2y ago with the same pump and lighting.
You’re purple and I’m pink for me. Yeah idk. I just think like. What’s the motive of deception? You could argue to get attention but like. Oh well yknow? Not exactly a crime to post to an anonymous gym group for attention. Not to mention everyone responding with hate is just fueling that.