Anonymous #6 18h

Ummm

40

Anonymous #3 18h

We were in high school when we started dating, didn’t really know/care about politics, tbh I thought arguing about it was kinda stupid. My friends got more involved in it and I realized how important it is. He is maga his parents/family are too but they kinda regret it now

73

Anonymous #4 18h

MAGA

42

Anonymous OP 18h

Does he regret it too? Did he care about politics or not care like you used to not care?

35

Anonymous OP 18h

Oh no

35

Anonymous #3 18h

No I don’t think so, my final straw with was him saying “girls should stop sleeping around instead of getting an abortion”

64

Anonymous OP 18h

Women SHOULD stop sleeping around instead of getting an abortion, among other things.

-11

Anonymous #6 18h

You should date him then, you two have a lot in common!

86

Anonymous OP 18h

Oh nooooo

8

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #6 18h

Correct answer. A babies life is most important. Both men and women should stop sleeping around and take it more seriously

31

Men should also stop sleeping around, I agree. A baby shouldn’t have to die so you can hook up.

55

Anonymous #1 18h

Contraceptives. Also it’s not a baby it’s an embryo

-3

It’s not that outrageous

20

Anonymous #3 17h

Embryo/fetus/offspring/baby— it's all the same. It's a human being with its own unique DNA from the moment of conception and this is a scientific fact.

32

Anonymous OP 17h

I'm happily married. 🤗

-6

Anonymous #3 17h

Changing the word doesn’t change reality as much as you would like it to

22

Anonymous #6 15h

Oh my god you guys are so freaking stupid. There is so much more nuance to abortion than “stupid sluts need to stop sleeping around” and I’m tired of numbnuts like you reducing it to that.

11

Anonymous #10 15h

It's really quite simple. Human life begins at conception wherein a unique human being with their own unique DNA is formed. Murder is the intentional ending of a human life. Therefore, abortion is murder. All human beings are worthy and equal, those in and out of the womb.

10

Anonymous #6 15h

Like we don’t have multiple laws protecting the right to that same definition you gave in different circumstances. Give me a break.

4

Anonymous #10 15h

And the life and life quality of a fully sentient human with the capacity to feel pain will always take precedence over a not sentient, unbaked potential person. It’s that simple. No one is saying a kid should have to die so people can hook up, we’re not advocating for infanticide. Most abortions happen in the first trimester.

0

Anonymous #10 15h

It's not an "unbaked potential person". It's a person, a human being, and you, and everyone who thinks like you, are ageist. Both the mother and the child take precedence, neither is more important for they are both equal.

-1

Anonymous #6 15h

What defines personhood? Sentience, awareness, and embryo or fetus has none of those things. It’s not even about age. If a brain dead or comatose fully grown person was somehow critically attached to a sentient person it wouldn’t be right to force that person to use their body to sustain them either. And I don’t think you’re being genuine when you say a mother doesn’t take precedence over an embryo. That’s insane. One party can feel pain, has loved ones, life goals, and can comprehend mortality.

12

Anonymous #10 15h

What is insane is you, and everyone like you, advocating for mothers to be able to murder their children simply because they have not been born.

0

Anonymous #6 14h

No one is advocating for that bro 🤦🏼‍♀️ I’m not in favor of infanticide. I’m not even in favor of third trimester abortions unless the mothers life is in danger. But an embryo is not a person. A fetus is not a person. And endangering the lives and wellbeing of mothers for something that cannot even feel is insane.

12

Anonymous #1 13h

Didn’t think about this perspective.

3

Anonymous #13 10h

Oh he tweakin… 😨

2

Anonymous #10 2h

The mother's life & well-being are RARELY in danger & we can thank modern medicine for that. This isn't 1900, my friend. Women have every avenue available to them to avoid pregnancy, as do men. With both man & woman trying to avoid pregnancy, it will likely not happen as the chances again are incredibly rare. Abortion is not a contraceptive. A fetus, a beautiful baby, is a human being & worthy of equal protection under the law. The fact you advocate for the murder of any human being is insane.

0

Anonymous #6 2h

Again, not advocating for murder. I don’t believe in infanticide or third trimester elective abortions. But you also fail to recognize that part of the reason *why* women no longer die or become seriously injured in childbirth as frequently is because of abortion. Women have been opting out of high risk pregnancies since the flipping Han dynasty, pal. I do think people should use contraception more often and abortion should seriously be a last resort- but it should still be available.

2

Anonymous #10 2h

You are advocating for murder by advocating for the abortion of any child at any stage, even if you aren't okay with third-trimester abortions. Abortion access is not why women have prospered medically — that's laughable. Have a good day!

0

Anonymous #6 1h

Children don’t get aborted though? Fetuses and embryos do.

2

Anonymous #10 1h

It's a child/fetus/embryo — a human being — regardless of how you want to define it. You need to read Dr. Ron Paul's book. Liberty Defined: The 50 Urgent Issues That Affect Our Freedom.

-1

Anonymous #6 1h

Did I not already articulate that I’m against specific cases like this? At two pounds that’s almost certainly a 3rd trimester abortion. This and taking mifepristone are two different things. Also he conveniently leaves out the circumstances that led to this abortion. Was the mother’s life was in danger here? Was the fetus incompatible with life? Also if abortion was illegal at the time, under what circumstances exactly did he see this take place??

5

Anonymous #6 10m

why is this getting upvoted what is wrong with people

2

Anonymous OP 1m

Why is this a controversial statement to make?😂😂

1