Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
girlboard icon
girlboard 1w
Chat is this sexist? We had an accreditation earlier this year and the lady said it was sexist to have this up on our X-ray machines/room
23 upvotes, 16 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in girlboard. "Chat is this sexist? We had an accreditation earlier this year and the lady said it was sexist to have this up on our X-ray machines/room"
comment

16
upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

No this is actually quite the opposite of being sexist

upvote 50 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Fuck no this is information that people with uteruses NEED to know

upvote 37 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

In this instance, no. This is crucial information for women that have uteruses, especially if they are actively pregnant. While we do see a lot of sex-based guidelines in the medical industry—this one is important and should be present.

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Apparently this is sexist too

post
upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

surely she's trolling right?

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

This is crazy what, y’all could get sued if you don’t give this disclaimer

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

no this is just health info and to be more cautious of you have a baby inside of u… for the baby to be safe

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

i see her point. it's the same as i feel about not being able to access acne medications that men can just get a prescription for and get the next day. i have to go through ten different barriers bc of some unfounded assumption that women are dumb cattle who have no control over being bred. i'm talking about ipledge specifically. i totally think that's misogynistic.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

in this case, i don't think it's as bad as ipledge at all. in fact, as long as it doesn't delay or prevent equal care, it doesn't bother me as much even if the messaging is an annoying implication

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

if anyone was curious what i was going on ab with ipledge, this sums it up a little

post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I totally get your point but I also think we have to acknowledge that there are biological differences that affect how safe the medication is. Like isotretinion babies are FUCKED UP. And I think the case being talked about in the OP post is completely different because it isn’t placing an additional burden on people with uteruses, it’s just informing them.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

It was a while ago now and I still think of it all the time bc I’m still in disbelief

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Literally. She told us to take it down but we actually haven’t bc we all feel like it’s important info!

upvote 30 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

yeah that's what i said. in this case, there's no burden so it doesn't bother me besides the messaging being annoying

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I mean how else would you word that

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

messages being annoying doesn't make them unnecessary.

upvote 1 downvote