I can’t lie I like being noncommittal with guys😶🌫️ but both parties should be cool with the setup before anything happens or it’s fucked up
39
Anonymous15h
It has to do with how we allow ourselves to be treated by these men
If they see us allowing non commital behavior they will do more of that because they believe that’s what’s best
16
Anonymous18h
So true
15
Anonymous11h
Situationships are government propoganda. Either hes just a dude you liked that didnt like you back or you’re together. Words like that are giving shi false meaning and forcing you to be attached to smth w no commitment. don’t fall for it were all too hot for this
11
Anonymous4h
this is where you gotta recognize you’re not compatible because you don’t want to be treated like a standby option
6
Anonymous16h
Idk I think most people should be monogamous and can’t actually handle non-committal relationships but some people can
5
Anonymous8h
Yea like I hate that it’s so normalized bc it leaves no room for people that want to find a partner and everyone is always playing a damn numbers game.
3
Deleted18h
Comment Deleted
0
Anonymous18h
feminism did not fight for low self esteem
75
Anonymous17h
least obvious man
26
Anonymous#516h
consensual non-monogamy 🤝 me
11
Anonymous#99h
tbf, I’m not “together” with someone after I go on one date. I’m still committed to them to the extent that I won’t flirt or go out with anyone else, but I still consider it a “situationship,” since it’s somewhere in-between
1
Anonymous#109h
but some people use the term for their six-month yearn session over a dude who straight-up hates them. the term’s just associated with low self-esteem atp, I wish we had more words for ts
2
Anonymous#41h
I have them blocked already I can’t see their comment LMAO