Anonymous #2 12w

glad to see it got taken down !!

9

Anonymous #3 12w

Many cis women don’t.

13

Anonymous #4 12w

very.

6

Anonymous #1 12w

If your referring to people who are intersex, people with Turner’s syndrome, they are a small percent of women. For the most part, women have xx chromosomes.

-3

Anonymous #3 12w

There are cis women who even go on to give birth who have XY chromosomes. Intersex people are not just one or two in every country, there are MILLIONS. More than there are redheads. Most don’t even know they’re Intersex, either. And yet they still prove women are not just XX. Even just ONE exception to the arbitrary “rule” would prove it wrong.

8

do you know that you can have xy chromosomes and ovaries (meaning they produce eggs !!). it’s possible. so what you say is invalid

3

“a requirement for female organisms” 🤓

5

Anonymous #2 12w

aw you deleted your comment #3

5

Anonymous #2 12w

Of course they’re lying and spreading bullshit.

1

Anonymous #2 12w

i was just abt to go off on them dang

9

Anonymous #4 12w

they’re too chicken shit to have an intellectual conversation that might make them change their thinking

6

Anonymous #4 12w

Also, #3, there are plenty of cis women born without ovaries or who have to have an oophorectomy. They’re still women because they’re not defined solely by their bodies nor do they exist to be your idea of an incubator. Chromosomes and organs are not all that makes someone who they are. Time to grow up.

2

Anonymous #1 12w

Yes, i am aware that there are millions of intersex which account for 1-2% of the population. Like I said before, I1 was referring to the vast majority of women. Your example with women that give birth even with XY chromosomes are not capable of producing their own egg. And no that does not mean a woman who are infertile are not women. The two events of producing an egg and xx chromosomes are heavily correlated among mammals.

-2

Anonymous #2 12w

No, I had to edit it. Unfortunately, there’s not a edit option which kind of sucks.

-1

Anonymous #3 12w

you’re daft

4

Anonymous #4 12w

You can still do it, just had to amend my original comment

0

Anonymous #3 12w

like genuinely what’s it like to be so ignorant

3

Anonymous #3 12w

Many XY cis women absolutely do produce their own eggs. And yet that’s not the only defining aspects. Biology is anything but simple. People cannot be shoved into two little boxes- it doesn’t and can’t work. “Male” and “female” are very loose words. They’re great for quick reference in research and such, but they are not enough to encapsulate the actual diversity and complexity there is. “Man” and “woman” are even more complex because they tie in sociolinguistics, cultural lenses, etc.

2

Anonymous #3 12w

Intersex people exist. Trans people exist. Even one automatically shows the “rule” does not work. Glad you could be educated a bit today! Learn from it and do better.

3

Anonymous #3 12w

you’re too caught up in sexual dimorphism to even think about anything else

3

Anonymous #1 12w

I’m aware that intersex and trans people exist, and as a science person, I heavily acknowledge that there are people with XXY, XXX, or X chromosomes. Glad I could educate you too, and thank you for the intellectual talk! 😊

-2

Anonymous #2 12w

I’m unfamiliar with this term, could you please enlighten me?

-2

Anonymous #2 12w

I’m sensing some ignorance from you too 😯

-2

Anonymous #3 12w

sexual dimorphism is the thing you’ve been harping on. as a “science person” you should know the term

5

Anonymous #3 12w

Cool, you know the bare minimum and were educated without sharing anything new with anyone else. Why do you keep trying to reduce women to incubators then? And don’t claim you’re “a science person” while you ask what sexual dimorphism means…

6

Anonymous #3 12w

Nope, only from you.

6

Anonymous #1 12w

as a “science person” they should also be capable of thinking outside the box

4

Anonymous #2 12w

or the binary, for that matter

2

Anonymous #1 12w

I looked around, and I could not find a case of someone with sywer syndrome producing their own eggs, if you could give me a source, I would be more than happy to take a look at it! I totally agree with the men and women as their definitions have changed and it’s a lot more involved with society and I don’t even wanna get started with those, there’s so much to know. I prefer sticking to more relatively fixed terms such as male and female, but still there’s always nuance with those terms

-1

Anonymous #2 12w

In other words it is cases of people with XXY, X or XXX chromosomes which I just stated

-1

Anonymous #1 12w

Well, you seemed pretty close minded, so I was just thought I’d shed some light on your current beliefs as you did with mine! Also, I was referring to the term female, which is best to talk about with science. I tried to stay away from the term woman as it has many social implications. I asked what daft means, did I not?

-1

Anonymous #3 12w

you asked what sexual dimorphism is. you responded to my comment about it with “enlighten me”. don’t try to act right

3

Anonymous #3 12w

Swyer syndrome is not the only female-assigned XY arrangement. And yes, there are those with XY who do have functioning ovaries. The Y chromosome carries very little genetic information on its own and what usually triggers larger differences in development are the SRY gene and hormones.

6

Anonymous #3 12w

Just learn the lesson and be better tomorrow.

3

Anonymous #2 12w

I responded to you calling me a daft, I think you’re a little confused

-1

Anonymous #3 12w

No, you responded to the mentioning of sexual dimorphism. Weeeeell after being called daft and then having it explained as being ignorant.

5

Anonymous #3 12w

again, come correct or don’t come at all. see yourself out

2

Anonymous #1 12w

If that does happen to be the case, I was not referring to that comment and I was asking what daft meant.

0

Anonymous #2 12w

Then that would mean, I would just remain “ignorant” and close minded

0

Anonymous #3 12w

Which you’re choosing to do, even when caught in a lie.

1

Anonymous #1 12w

What lie?

0