
it originally DID sound like you called out only gay men for something all men do—as if they were uniquely misogynistic in that. myself and many others read your post the same way they did before you clarified & gave better examples. that wasn’t a bad-faith reading, and it gave you the space to clarify for others who thought the same
your original example was extremely general, though. its use implied you believed gay men put down women much more commonly than straight men, since otherwise you wouldn’t bring up smth all men do. you later clarified that gay male misogyny is unique in how they justify it with their queerness, but the example you gave wasn’t specific