
If a man works 60 hours a week solely to ensure his kids can go to college or have a backyard, he is sacrificing his time and energy for them. Without the family, he might choose to work 20 hours a week and live a minimalist life. disagree if you want to, but my dad worked his ass off for us so🤷♀️🤷♀️
I don’t think ur cooking on this ngl. It’s about the time commitment. A man with no family or kids to take care of only has to take care of himself. He won’t have to work as much to do that, and he will have free time to pursue hobbies and personal interests. A man who has a family to provide for doesn’t get the luxury of having those hobbies, or whatever else they have to give up for the sake of their family. Their entire life is just work and sleep.
no exactly. my bf only worked his scheduled hrs before we met. after seeing me struggle trying to balance school and a full time job, he chose to start picking up more hours so i could catch a break without worrying about the money. he’s sacrificing his time and energy for mine and i only wish my dad would have been like that for my mom so she didn’t have to drop out.
Obviously each person is going to be different. But on average an adult will have a full time job regardless of if they have kids or not. My dad and mom both worked regular full time jobs to support us growing up. The WAY they spend their money is a sacrifice, but not the fact that they have a job and have to make money, because they’d have been doing that regardless if they had me and my siblings or not
My Dad broke his back for me and my sister to send us to school. Woke up at 6am, worked till 8pm everyday. Sometimes later. Only got Sunday off but he still went in on Sunday sometimes, but for less hours. I don’t think he was crazy for expecting my mother, who stayed home with us and didn’t work, to have dinner ready when he was home 🤷♀️
Thats not what this post is saying and im sorry if you felt personally attacked for me not specifying every situation this may or may not apply to. If your dad ACTUALLY sacrificed most of his life for you and your family to exist, working more than a REGULAR full time job, then obviously im not talking about you. However, my dad worked a regular 40 hours a week full time job, he had free time, he had special interests, etc. he would have had to have that job regardless if he had kids or not
Yea each person is ofc going to be different and have different income, but IMO, a single person has the freedom to quit a toxic environment or take a career risk because they are the only ones who suffer if it fails. a lot of parents "sacrifice” their mental health by staying in a soul-crushing job specifically because they cannot risk to lose their job solely for the benefit of their kids. yes they’re both essential working the same job, but the sacrifices are so different
And he would have been able to spend the money on other stuff for himself instead of on you and your siblings if you didn’t exist. Like you said. Thats the point. He gave up on those other things for you. Then you grow up and most a post like this :/. Bit of a spit in the face to your own Dad. And I do understand there are lazy men and bums, not lets not make light of the sacrifices the men who raised us made, and the many other men like them.
If you read the first sentence of what i said, i literally said that. My dad had a full time job before i was born, and he had one after. He did not give up anything to continue to have a job. He DID sacrifice how he was spending his money to take care of me and my brothers, the same way my mom did. It is not a spit in the face to him, he raised me to be the woman i am today. He raised me to give credit where its due. MY dad knows how much i love him
Both give up their lives but in different ways. The issue with people like you is that you all for some reason see the other gender of an enemy. I also never said women gave less, I was clarifying if that was what the post was claiming. In my case, my Dad gave up more than my Mom. But Im just one case. To claim one gender gives up more than the other, when there are many different variables and situations between the billions of members of each gender, is just ignorance.
I mean yes i think socially and physically women absolutely give up more to be a mom and raise kids. But yes i mean the logic can also apply to working moms. My mom did not give up anything to CONTINUE to have a job. She had one before i was born, she continued to have one after i was born. She did not sacrifice her time to have a job BECAUSE of me and my siblings because she already had a job before we were a thought
…you’re making some real crazy assumptions about me that im just gonna ignore lol but if you’re really trying to argue that working more hours and LITERALLY giving birth are equivalent i genuinely don’t know what else i can say to you. if you personally think they give up an equal amount you’re free to do that but when both men and women work and the only difference is a woman risking her health and life to give birth, which is the case for the majority of families, yeah lol women give up more
Then we just disagree 🤷♀️. I think men and women give up give up an equal amount in different ways because men and women are fundamentally different. I made that assumption because I you immediately took what I said and made it a man vs women thing when thats not even what I was trying to get at
Thats a great point. Thats one struggle women have. Men have struggles too that women will never have to deal with. Thats all im trying to say. I dislike how everything and everyone seems to be this gender does more and this gender does less. Why can’t we just acknowledge we both struggle, and in acknowledging that, come together and help one another?
if you took me saying women risk and give up more due to the fact we’re the ones that are pregnant and give birth as a man vs woman thing that’s a you problem. i’m not putting men down by acknowledging what women have to go through to have a family and the fact you took it that way is very telling
okay so do you not understand what this post was about? this was literally just saying that men who work a full time job PRIOR to having a child are not sacrificing anything by CONTINUING to work at that job after having one, especially if they continue to work the same hours. bc they would have to do that anyway. we also can’t do that bc when it’s pointed out how women genuinely DO give up more, you’re immediately on the defensive
yes. that’s my point. men and women have to cook and clean for themselves while single. so if within a family BOTH people are working and only ONE is doing the domestic tasks for TWO PEOPLE, that means one person’s life is made MUCH EASIER because they do not have that responsibility anymore, while the other person’s life is made MUCH HARDER
can i be really honest? i genuinely thought you’d be smart enough to know i was talking about when both people are working considering i clarified that in one of the first replies i made to you. i really truly thought you’d be able to puzzle that out yourself instead of bringing up a completely different scenario that had nothing to do with what’s being talked about in this actual post
I didn’t use it to put down women. Im sure that phrase has been used like that, but just because some people say that phrase as an excuse to be shitty doesn’t make it false. Also i brought up my situation to help OP realize they were being ignorant. But yall just kinda ran with that and made a bunch of assumptions I never explicitly said :/
Im not being ignorant LMFAO you’re not even trying to engage in the conversation in a productive way. I said if you need clarification on the actual point of the post, i’d be happy to clarify. But take it at face value, because thats exactly what it is. Theres no underlying meaning
You brought up your situation from the start because its an exception of the average situation people are discussing, you aren’t understanding that any “fundamental difference” doesn’t dismiss that the avg woman are not only contributing with pregnancy, delivery, and domestic labor but also working full time just like their husbands, you’re using the phrase to persuade ppl to accept inequality in this context
You when no brain cells were able to form a thought that restaurants still need a manager 💀 you couldn’t last 1 day running a floor while doing inventory, being timed by the second from open til close, handling cash, etc. Your type of thinking would literally run a business to the ground 💀
I mean yeah that’s fair but even then your set 40 hours could mean you have enough money for 2 vacations a year, whatever car you want and go out to eat whenever you want. Add a child to the mix and sure you work the same hours but now you have a mini van, 1 family weekend vacation and you have to cook every night. I think y’all misunderstand the average cost to raise a child per year in the cheapest state is minimum 20,000$. That’s a used car every year. No matter what it will be a sacrifice
HOW you spend your money after having kids is a sacrifice, not the fact you work a job. You were already using that time to work a job before you had kids, you’re gonna use that time after having kids. You did not make a sacrifice working a 40 hour a week job after having kids if you already had one/were going to have one
It depends where you’re living. There are definitely places in the us where you can have a family on 50k. It’s not going to be easy but I know people who grew up like that. My brother was providing for his wife and daughter on 21k a year for a few years. He’s making like 40k now and doing much better and has another daughter
This is all quite ridiculous, but maybe this will help you understand. 40 hour a week job with no kids I get the job at 25, stay 20 years saving and investing (how I spend my money) and retire at 45 with plenty to last my lifestyle well into my 80s. 40 hour a week job with kids, stay 40 years saving and investing less (because children) and retire at 65. Sure same job same hours, just you know 20 extra years of working. “Is sacrificing nothing” though.
People in America are not retiring at 45 lmfao unless those 20 years you spent working you just lived to save money. There are a plethora of different factors that affect you being able to retire at 45, do you live alone, do you live in a house or apartment, what kind of job do you have and how much money do you make, do you have a car, where in america do you live where this would be feasible
by this logic tho. the person is working to survive and is sacrificing their own time for work. You can’t even think about kids in a situation like that let alone work that same full time job. if i wanted kids i would have to sacrifice more time and space. every single person will spend money on themselves or for others because that’s a natural.