Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
so when aaron rodgers bashes his ex-fiance men INSTANTLY believe it and call her a witch. but when a woman comes forward about her ex-boyfriend SAing her it’s “well where’s the evidence” Y’ALL I’M SO TIRED
upvote 15 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

History indicates a lot more false claims brought forth by women. SA is a flat out crime with legal ramifications and jail time implications, obviously there will be more scrutiny when the stakes are higher.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

that’s not the point. the point is they applied NO SCRUTINY. no one even thought to consider if he was credible. they just believed him and attacked her. but they demand a woman to have infinite evidence before they even consider saying a bad word about a man. but sure! let’s send death threats to Woodley because of one man’s word.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

and “history indicates” is a claim that requires citations

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

False claims are so far and few between. Rarely ever are assailants actually brought to any form of justice.

upvote 2 downvote