Ew ur disgusting she never said that either btw

51

Comment Deleted

0

Oh ew..

52

Comment Deleted

0

We can hate rapists and not be a man hater but your IQ is that of a bag of rocks

52

Anonymous #3 20h

Well they aren’t rapists are they? She gave consent, told DAA she gave consent, and said she’d do it again. So idk if I’d consider them rapists.

-21

Anonymous #3 20h

Silly goose

-7

Anonymous #1 20h

she was gonna sleep with 2 guys then they drugged her after you are intoxicated you can’t consent even if she begged for it it would still be rape.

38

Anonymous #1 20h

Consenting to sex with 2 guys is not consenting to 5 other guys coming to rape her 👍

30

You’re sick as hell

21

Anonymous #1 20h

Well then why wouldn’t she have just said that then?

-12

Anonymous #1 20h

Sex that you regret is not rape jack wagon

-13

Anonymous #1 19h

You can’t consent to sex when under the influence so she could not consent any further. It’s a really simple concept.

26

Anonymous #1 19h

Mind sharing this article?

8

Anonymous #3 19h

Ofc

-7

Anonymous #3 19h

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/text-messages-reveal-new-details-in-alleged-gang-rape-at-cornell-university/

-5

Anonymous #3 19h

I would agree if she was the only one, everyone was drugged and under the influence. And even when she was sober she said nothing was illegal

-7

Anonymous #3 19h

Been real quite since this dropped gg frickin ez

-5

Anonymous #1 19h

crazy how the proof is dropped yet you all are still disagreeing

6

Anonymous #7 19h

Who me?

0

Comment Deleted

0

Ik bro it’s hilarious, it is a girls chat so it’s gonna be super feminist so they hate to hear that it was her own doing.

-3

Anonymous #1 18h

I’m a girl and can recognize both sides 🫩

1

Anonymous #7 18h

Bro I’m not saying it like that, I worded that terribly but I’m saying that most of them CAN’T see both sides.

-1

Anonymous #1 18h

Idk I think it’s crazy

1

Anonymous #7 18h

Agreed, I love rage baiting them tho

-2

She legit did!!!

17

You got evidence of that happening? Also why would she say that while actively trying to sue Cornell.

7

Anonymous #9 18h

Because she regrets what she did, https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/text-messages-reveal-new-details-in-alleged-gang-rape-at-cornell-university/

-13

Anonymous #1 18h

No it’s called I have a life and can’t be on yikyak 24/7 💀 it’s sad that you are

13

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #1 18h

If you actually read the article it talks about how she was likely in denial which is extremely common when going through a traumatic event. Plus women will fawn instead of freeze when it comes to threats. She could have still felt like there was a threat and reached out to the man to fawn.

21

Anonymous #1 18h

“Rage baiting” and it’s taking things out of context to make a potential rape victim look bad.

10

Anonymous #9 18h

We she swore to tell the truth and nothing but the truth so changing something up 2 years later makes me skeptical. But basically what you’re saying is she broke another law 🫵🫩

-2

Anonymous #3 18h

No seriously tho the amount of joy I receive from rage baiting this page would be enough to be my new hobby

-5

Anonymous #9 18h

Out of context?! I just dropped a whole damn article on yo ass and you still can’t comprehend the fact you’re wrong. Straight up

-4

Anonymous #1 18h

Ew saw you’re other post didn’t know u were racist and misogynistic

15

Brother I’m not even black and you’re being racist for no reason 💀 this is actually embarrassing you have to resort to that

16

Anonymous #1 18h

How is any of this rage bait? We’re talking about fucking rape.

11

Anonymous #1 18h

Actually, changing your story when in deposition or testifying is pretty common for traumatic events. I work for a law office and I was a psych major in uni, so Ik about this kind of stuff. Also she never testified that she enjoyed it. In her original testimony she stated what happened and the da chose to not move forward with prosecution because there was no direct evidence of force used. It is still rape if she was high and/ or drunk. They also brought more men into it without her wanting it.

14

Anonymous #7 18h

She forgot what she was arguing about😭🙏

-5

Anonymous #1 18h

The DA then reopened the case because they recognized that the healing process is different for everyone. That is why her testimony or statement was not correctly stated. Here’s the DA statement. https://www.tompkinscountyny.gov/News-articles/District-Attorney-statement-regarding-Jane-Doe-v.-Cornell-University-et-al

12

Anonymous #9 18h

She brought drunk men in too, so she raped them! Like just because you didn’t enjoy the sex doesn’t make it rape. Regretting having sex is not rape

-5

Anonymous #1 18h

Read the da statement first man. Holy shit.

18

Anonymous #9 18h

Mb didn’t realize you wrote a book

-3

Anonymous #1 18h

Also, for law related issues please stop relying on the news. They are there for money and views. Go to the states government site and when the case is public, read it, it gives you more evidence and you can form your own true opinion. The news is always going to spin things.

20

Anonymous #9 18h

Yes, she was sober and mentally stable right? So she swore to a government official and lied? Both parties are dumb and disgusting, the men should be jailed but so should she. She was having sex and having a good time and took MORE drug mid session. 3/7 dudes didn’t even touch her. Either way she’s in the wrong too

-4

Anonymous #1 18h

She could be in the wrong but then again the law is subject to changing for certain cases and there is precedent for trauma influencing statements. (And if she is in the wrong, the men can also sue her) That’s why certain states now let you restate about your case years later. And now why you can wait like 50 years after csa to report it. Mental health affects a lot of your memories and how you act, so the law has changed a lot, especially in the past few years, to accommodate that.

6

Anonymous #5 18h

Trauma can really change how you react to things. The DAs statement talks about that which is why they reopened the case again. https://www.tompkinscountyny.gov/News-articles/District-Attorney-statement-regarding-Jane-Doe-v.-Cornell-University-et-al

22

Anonymous #1 18h

Yeah cuz im not a racist misogynistic small dick bitch

14

Anonymous #1 18h

Also if the DA believes she is in the wrong the DA will press charges. They are not a biased opinion, the DA acts in the best interest of the law. (Most times). Also one last thing, a statement under oath means at that time, that is what you truly believe what happened and it is to the best of your ability and knowledge. You also do that every time you renew your license or vote. It’s an oath, but humans are not infallible, we make mistakes on facts.

3

Anonymous #5 17h

That literally doesn’t matter. This is very common with SA victims and is a part of victimology. It shouldn’t be used to discredit her

15

Anonymous #1 17h

Wrong. This is very common for sa victims. Let’s maybe do some reading outside of just this case before you make yourself look like an even bigger dip shit

34

Anonymous #1 17h

Once again this is incredibly common with SA victims bc of the nature of their crimes. You’re just a moronic POS

7

Oohhhh so the stupid scum is also racist

14

Anonymous #7 17h

Yeah they’ve been a POS this whole time

9

Anonymous #10 16h

I think he is, I gave him the DA statement and he still tried to argue that she should be convicted. the DA is able to understand that trauma affects statements, and it’s laid out in layman’s terms so it’s not hard to understand.

8

After the first 2 guys she consented with, guilty. And even then, the 2 guys are the ones that put her into that situation. So, yes, everyone involved is guilty

5

Anonymous #9 15h

She said she got raped so she didn’t look like a whore they were all drunk they were all under the influence

7

Anonymous #12 15h

From her original statement with campus police btw. Also you’re a POS

11

Anonymous #1 14h

you’re stupid.

10