Anonymous #3 8w

holy fuck the madonna/whore complex with men is baffling. not a virgin does not always equal fucking around are we deadass

36

Anonymous #3 8w

do you hold men to this same standard as well or what

29

Anonymous #5 8w

yes. double standards are a thing

7

Anonymous #3 8w

this is girl talk get out

20

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

They’re not justifying being a slut, they’re showing OP the flaws in their perspective and not to worry abt dumb shit like virginity. Also why does not being a virgin automatically mean slut?? We should all be adults here

25

Anonymous #3 8w

Morals are objective so like what a weird take. Plus just bc you sleep with people doesn’t mean you don’t respect yourself

13

Anonymous #10 8w

morals aren’t objective because they are based on human values, beliefs, emotions, and cultural standards. those aren’t just universals facts that ppl think independently

9

i do. if i could take it back then i would in a heartbeat but we live and we learn. my future wife doesn’t deserve that

0

the irony is that you are more mad about a girl being a "slut" for not being a virgin than you are at guys for doing all that stuff lol

21

completely missing the point of the comment AND misspelling pea brain has got to be the lowest IQ thing i’ve ever seen

14

Anonymous #14 8w

as a man i would say that most ppl do not view it as a competition and if you aren’t patient enough for someone to be good enough to please you how patient are you with other aspects of a relationship?

2

Anonymous #3 8w

Morality being objective is one of the main talking points of philosophy….. and guess what? Different cultures hold different beliefs, humans have different values, etc. No one believes the same thing so thank you for proving my point

2

Anonymous #3 8w

that seems totally contradictory to what you originally commented

5

Anonymous #10 8w

i think you’re confusing the terms … morality is SUBjective, not OBjective. objective means based on facts and not influenced by your beliefs

1

Anonymous #13 8w

Shit thank you. I gotta stop getting on this shit high. Thank you!

4

Anonymous #12 8w

My fucking bad bro I’m toasted. Subjective is what I meant. Thank you #13!

6

Anonymous #10 8w

LOLL you’re so good, i completely agree with you btw 😭😭

5

Anonymous #10 8w

Oh no worries, I got what you meant! I meant that #3 was contradicting themselves

4

Anonymous #3 8w

i wasnt implying anything to be wrong with virgins or teaching someone. if you read what i said, i specifically stated the nature of the relationship; i.e. if im doing something casual, id prefer to not have a virgin(various reasons). if its someone i love or want to be my partner, i would have no problem showing them the ropes and taking the time. im aware most sane people dont view it as a competition, but the reason this issue is so prevalent is because of people who do, which is usually men.

1

Anonymous #3 8w

youre making assumptions out of what i was saying. i have preference, not necessity. i wouldnt decide on a persons advances because theyre a virgin or not, i could care less about that. virgins have a tendency to catch feelings in casual situations. they also tend to need more time for certain stuff, not preferable to my schedule, which is no dig at them. i dont hang with all of my friends for hours on end — sometimes its for a couple minutes. theres nuances here youre choosing to ignore.

1

Anonymous #14 8w

everybody has different needs or wants, and i wholeheartedly respect that; i would certainly hope others have a similar respect for me. its a give and take. and to be entirely clear, patience is not a negative thing to any extent

1

Anonymous #14 8w

so what your implying is that you don’t date to marry. i feel like that’s disrespectful to your partner or whoever you’re talking to. leading ppl is disrespectful.

0

Anonymous #3 8w

its not disrespectful if all parties are consenting? youre actually ragebaiting rn._.

1