
It won’t let me reply to the actual comment but to #4. Girl 💀 we’re built to push entire tiny humans out of our pussies and go back to normal. I promise you weren’t “much less tight” after having sex once. I’m sorry your first time hurt and all but that was just shitty sex not some permanent vagina altering ritual. The whole hymen actually meaning anything myth is just that, a myth perpetuated by men to police women’s bodies for far too long
…which happens naturally. hymens naturally thin as someone ages. biking or stretching or any other physical activity can cause it to weaken and tear. “once you’re open you’re open” is also such a gross way to describe it. there’s no noticeable difference in a woman before or after her hymen thins/breaks to say she’s now ‘open’
that CAN happen, but it’s not an inherent part of sex. there also isn’t any ‘breaking’ of the hymen. it weakens and thin and tears as a woman grows and goes through her life, but there’s no single moment where it breaks. theres also no possible way a dick can stretch a vagina to the point it’s permanently looser. sex can definitely be an important moment in someone’s life but the idea that it physically changes a woman in any significant way literally just isn’t true
like correct me if i’m wrong but if your argument is that sex DOES change a woman bc it changes the state of her hymen… what does that really matter if the hymen naturally thins and there are dozens of other things that can cause it to tear that has nothing to do with sex? do you see how ridiculous that sounds to single out one single activity? do you think it’s a coincidence it’s the ONE thing that also involves men and puts them in the active role of ‘breaking’ part of a woman?
My point is, it’s not valid to act like having sex doesn’t matter or change an individual (it changes men as well), but it’s not something to act like has no significance. It has mental impacts on both, and more so physical effects for women, not to mention risk of infection/disease/pregnancy. My point is the post acts like virginity is a made up concept that has no value when it does, and having sex with a bunch of individuals is not good for a woman’s health.
And you can look this up but when sperm enters a woman the immune system attacks it, but when it is the same sperm from one partner the body learns to “accept” it I suppose is the term. The body doesn’t see it as foreign. But when it’s a bunch of different types of DNA it has a negative impact on a woman’s health
that absolutely is not what you said at all. you made the argument that sex changes a woman because of what happens to her hymen. obviously sex can impact her life, but it doesn’t change HER AS A PERSON. virginity literally is a made up concept. can you tell with 100% certainty who around you has had sex and who hasn’t? no? i wonder why that us
If you read what I said, I specified that it does not change a woman as a person it’s not some enlightenment, and yeah virginity is not a medical diagnosis, you cannot physically see just from appearance if someone is a virgin, but the concept of losing virginity by HAVING SEX does have physical/health related consequences, and for many individuals INCLUDING MYSELF it does impact hymen tissue
It doesn’t have to be men, you keep trying to make it all about men’s doing and it is an invalid concept made by men for power, my point still stands for a lesbian couple using a strap on, it’s just the concept of the anatomy of vagina with penis-like structure, whether it is an actual penis or not
no one has ever said anything otherwise! but you literally said virginity has value, so i was responding to your words. and for the millionth time, yes, sex can impact the hymen. but sex is not the ONLY thing that can do that, just like sex is not the ONLY thing that can negatively (or positively) impact a woman’s health. there’s no word for people who have gotten the flu/haven’t gotten in. like i’ve already said, it’s not a coincidence the one act that involves a man regarding a woman’s body
and you define having sex as including penetration? so are people who have done everything but that still virgins? you can get stds/stis without technically having sex in that case. what unique change does sex make in a person? bc the consequences of penetration aren’t exclusive to JUST sex, and the consequences of sex aren’t exclusive to it either
The exchange of DNA that is temporarily in one’s system would be a very broad way to put it, where the immune system recognizes and adapts to it for the first time, in addition to the risk of pregnancy for opposite sex intercourse, and risk of disease can apply which that would definitely be lasting, again different forms of intercourse have different characteristics
kissing also involves an exchange of dna. does that count as sex now? do only couples who risk pregnancy count as having sex, if that’s one of its only unique characteristics? are men with vasectomies permanently virgins? what about women who have has hysterectomies? again the risk of disease is not unique to sex, so it makes no sense to create a word to describe someone before and after that takes place since… it’s not unique to that situation
well if you wanna get real technical, the idea of virginity was invented because in early human settlements, people wanted to organize their now permanent belongings and pass them down to their offspring. women definitely knew who their offspring were, but men got pissy that they didn’t. so they’d complain until their partner said “yeah fine i swear i’ll only sleep with you or whatever”. virginity was then invented as an insurance measure for this system and enforced on future generations.
lol yeah microbiologist here and you aren’t listening, did you even take classes, you know how there are EXCEPTIONS? also calling me a dumbass bitch isn’t very girls girl of you, yeah the subcellular level doesn’t change but do some research on how multitudes of DNA from different partners impacts health, also do you even know how or why a rape kit is performed, it’s because there is evidence left behind, do me a favor and don’t go into the medical field
You act like the body ‘absorbs’ or keeps DNA beyond being cleaned out. It doesn’t. Rape kits require usage ASAP after assault to get that DNA as it’s cleaned out, either via intense showering or the natural vaginal/anal/oral cleansing, whichever happens first. There is a limit to the time evidence can be collected from someone’s body after an assault. They can’t be used after someone is cleaned because then it’s gone from there, not kept and held onto.
Dude everything is rooted in history literally EVERYTHING. Why ? Because women used to have very limited rights, that’s like saying almost all of science is based on misogyny bc mostly men studied science. Yeah, there aren’t as many studies on women because of it I’ll admit that, but facts are facts
so any woman who wants to have sex before marriage or multiple partners, also you’re acting like condoms don’t exist which are extremely effective, but you are acting like anyone who has sex with multiple people is automatically a whore? like genuinely what the fuck… so having a body count of like 3 automatically makes you Bonnie Blue? regardless of how or why the term virginity was coined the way it is used most of the time RIGHT NOW is to shame women through some religion, high horse moral
Was it not men who wrote the Bible??? God didn’t just magically make a book with all the information printed on it. It was men who wrote it claiming it came from god or their experience with god, but men nonetheless. And then translated countless times (mostly by men) to what it is now
Except virginity doesn’t do either of that. There is no solid way to “prove” virginity, especially centuries ago. The hymen is different for ever women, some aren’t even born with it, some break from non-sexual interactions (e.g. horseback), some degrade on their own. So how exactly could virginity rule out “liars” when a woman could not have a hymen but still be a virgin.
And nothing stops a virgin from cheating after losing their virginity. Hell, all cheaters were once virgins. There was never a way to guarantee your baby was actually yours back then unless you watched your partner 24/7. You’d never know if your genes were actually passed, virgin or not.
the hymen does in fact mean something.. every woman’s hymen is different and in my case i had a microperforate septate hymen that has been surgically corrected but if i attempted to have sex or even insert a tampon it wouldn’t been incredibly painful and bloody leaving scar tissue that would prevent sex from ever being enjoyable. just because you haven’t experienced that doesn’t mean other women haven’t either
The hymen is the vaginal equivalent of a webbed toe. It is a meaningless skin flap that some people have and it does nothing, some people don’t have it, and yeah some people get it surgically altered. It has zero actual meaning about a person like 4 has been up in arms about. A piece of skin doing skin things doesn’t make it have some inherent value and doesn’t mean sex fundamentally changes how the vagina works like they were claiming
I’m honestly sad for you. You have been brainwashed to think that men are the only option and that sex can only happen when a man is involved. You seem angry inside and idk if it’s because you’re hiding something or if you were just raised to think that you’re only a worthy woman and can only have something real if a man is in the picture. You shouldn’t be this angry or uncomfortable by the thought of women having sex. People secure in their sexuality don’t gaf about anyone else’s.
This is genuinely sad for you like you’re so prudish about sex there’s no way you’re exploring any kind of intimacy freely. It doesn’t make love sex centered to acknowledge the incredibly vast forms of intimacy that exist including types of sex. You sound like the people that are so insecure with the connections within their relationships nobody is allowed to have close friends or other gendered friends because many types of intimacy are too foreign to cope with
I have virgin guy friends. The worst they’ll get is “haha virgin” as in, you can’t pull. With women it’s “she’s a whore,” as in you pull, and and you’re disgusting for it. Very different, and way more harmful toward women. It also originated with an attempt for men to have ownership of their wives. Look into the history of it
Okay well you are also comparing virgin men to non virgin women and that’s just not a comparison that can be made logically. It seems from your comment that you don’t actually have an issue with the concept of “virginity” you have a problem with patriarchy and that’s a different thing but not invalid, it’s just weird that you’re mashing them together and making inequal comparisons instead of making a point that actually proves something if that makes sense but wtvv have a good night❤️