
a lot of men def have done those things, but so many are obsessed with bringing it up because they have no idea what actually constitutes as SA/SH/rape, and see a real accusation and think “but that’s not a crime” when it is. so they inflate the false accusation thing because they’ve seen REAL cases they consider to be “false accusations”
Not that oppression isn’t a horrible thing, but Thailand, Japan, and Liberia were never colonized and all three turned out quite differently. South America was primary colonized by Catholics etc… it does seem to have some effect, but the causal link as the sole reason for a nation doing poorly does not appear to exist.
That one is also a specified data set. Again, while the numbers appear heavy in one direction, it still doesn’t create a complete causal link between skin color and propensity towards violence. I would tell you what does, but the world doesn’t seem to be ready for that conversation yet (it’s not racial).
If I was a criminal investigator assigned this case, and that was part of her testimony, it would be near impossible for me to get a conviction for aggravated rape. I could potentially still get a charge to stick for sexual assault, but additional details and who the jury was would be critical factors.
consenting to one person isnt the same as consenting to all of them, also she was severely under the influence 😭 she could not consent. this part is still irrelevant when she did not consent. I imagine #2 only posted it because he finds the gay part funny. I doubt he’s put much thought into it.
Depends on if it’s state or federal but last time the broad study between the two was done and reported back to us, “sexual assault included an attempt of penetration however slight” where as battery was unwanted/undesired/non-consensual contact with a sexual body part. Simple battery would just be contact like grabbing someone by the wrist to prevent them from leaving, or shoving someone.
Could potentially get a sexual battery charge if yall were both fully clothed and the defense attorney made the argument there was no possible way you could be penetrated. Open’s the perpetrator up to having his junk examined. If yall were both naked, could be sexual assault. Communal shower type situation.
So i guess we can’t read? Because the two things that I said were rape are legally classified as rape and the other things I mentioned, I clarified it was sexual assault or harassment. And i was saying most of the men who have done those things are being forced to realize it was rape/SA/SH.